RE: God's self esteem and the human free will : NO FORCED CONVERSION WITH THE SWORD
July 17, 2014 at 4:40 pm
(This post was last modified: July 17, 2014 at 5:01 pm by Mister Agenda.)
(July 16, 2014 at 4:04 pm)AtlasS Wrote: How I see it is that, Yahweh created hell so those who caused pain in this life suffer the pain they caused to others. Causing pain and corruption to others is what makes the lord angry ; it's not a need he wants to satisfy.
Shouldn't the punishment be proportionate to the crime? The hell described by Muslims seems excessive for any finite crime, and humans are only capable of committing finite crimes.
(July 16, 2014 at 4:04 pm)AtlasS Wrote: Sometimes people don't see how they hurt others by things they think "normal", while in reality, they caused unimaginable pain to others.
Even if a human inflicts 'unimaginable' pain, it only lasts so long. Inflicting it back ten times over is excessive, let alone a million times over, let alone for eternity.
(July 16, 2014 at 4:04 pm)AtlasS Wrote: Just like that guy whom god blessed with a beautiful loving mate, yet he still insist on cheating on her or go watch porn behind her back. Vise versa to the naughty lady. Sometimes it gives people depression that leads to suicide. God in this case gets angry because he knows the pain that person A caused to his mate, for not following the rules of god by staying away from lust & sexual thinking.
We don't think appropriate punishment for 'that guy' is excruciating torture for years on end, let alone centuries. Getting angry is understandable for humans who have good reasons for not being able to anticipate how someone will behave, and thus be surprised and hurt by it, but there is a point where anger is satisfied and the only reason to continue to punish is a sadistic desire to keep on hurting someone.
(July 16, 2014 at 4:04 pm)AtlasS Wrote: Homosexuality was given here as an example of a taboo that was broken; just like stating religion as a new taboo in many countries with large atheist population.
Can you name a non-communist country where religion is taboo?
(July 16, 2014 at 4:16 pm)Chad32 Wrote: The problem with hell is that it isn't for bad people. It's for people who displease Yahweh. While these two groups may overlap, they aren't the same. Jeffrey Dahmer is supposedly in heaven, while Anne Frank isn't. The only case I could make for Hitler being in hell is that he decided to commit suicide. Otherwise he was a catholic, and presumably said the right things to the right god.
I believe following the laws of this god has caused more harm than good.
I may be mistaken, but he may have had Eva Braun shoot him so it wouldn't be suicide and he could die a Catholic in good standing.
(July 16, 2014 at 4:43 pm)AtlasS Wrote: So that they live and enjoy life without causing misery and armageddon to others. And this cannot be achieved without worshiping god.
Countries with high levels of organic athism are among the happiest and most equitable in the world. Contrast with countries under Islamic theocracies. QED.
(July 16, 2014 at 4:43 pm)AtlasS Wrote: God created us to worship him.
Narcissism is not more attractive in God than in people.
(July 16, 2014 at 4:43 pm)AtlasS Wrote: Worshipping god doesn't include bringing him food.
Not these days, anyway.
(July 16, 2014 at 4:43 pm)AtlasS Wrote: It includes treating others well, building the universe, enjoying his blessings.
If that's what worshiping God is, you don't even need to believe he's real to worship him.
(July 16, 2014 at 4:43 pm)AtlasS Wrote: Do you get the relation ? worshiping god = living & enjoying life with peace, honesty & charity. That's how muslims worship god.
If only that were true of more of them.
(July 16, 2014 at 4:43 pm)AtlasS Wrote: I saw a lot of people in my life who thought free will includes doing what they want.
Probably because that's pretty much the definition.
(July 16, 2014 at 4:43 pm)AtlasS Wrote: Eventually they turned prisoners to drinking, drugs and other terrible stuff.
Hm. Neither mysel nor my many friends who don't believe in God are prisoners to drinking, drugs, or other terrible stuff. For the most part we are happy and consider ourselves fortunate. Maybe the common denominator in the experience of the people in your life who actually understand what the term 'free will' means, is that they believed, but didn't choose to live their beliefs. I have no trouble living my belief that people should be kind and generous.
(July 16, 2014 at 4:43 pm)AtlasS Wrote: So, the real free will lies in constraining it with a godly code of ethics -i.e Quran-, or you will be the prisoner of something else..
Abusing the natural free will by using it openly will lead you to lose it.
Are you familiar with the concept of 'newspeak' from George Orwell's 1984? It's the practice of changing language for propaganda purposes. You seem to be going with 'slavery is freedom'.
(July 16, 2014 at 4:43 pm)AtlasS Wrote: Muslims are humans & believe it or not : many don't even believe in these concepts.
Muslims are diverse, for sure.
(July 16, 2014 at 4:43 pm)AtlasS Wrote: Notice that if you brought the Quran as a ruling medium in the Middle East, everybody will fight you, including "ISIS and Al Qaeda".
They wouldn't all agree with your interpretation of the Quran, certainly.
(July 16, 2014 at 4:43 pm)AtlasS Wrote: Many Muslims don't follow the direct word of god -Quran-, believe it or not the majority think that the Quran alone is not valid ; it must be accompanied with the "Hadith".
Islam would benefit from more 'Quran-only' Muslims.
(July 16, 2014 at 4:43 pm)AtlasS Wrote: and that is sir the source of Muslim violence. Some Hadiths are correct and match the Quran, but many many many other are forged and defy it, literally defy it, and has tons of violence that the Quran despises.
It's not just the Hadith. Most of the areas where Muslims are a majority are impoverished (and have always been so), and there's a ton of history and politics and tribalism involved as well. Jettisoning the Hadith would be an improvement, but many of the underlying causes of violence would remain.
(July 16, 2014 at 4:43 pm)AtlasS Wrote: But no, I defy the vatican in that.. even if you did good without a believe in god, you're still a person who isn't on the right track
Isn't a Muslim defying the Vatican like a Texan defying the Canadians? You are free to disagree with the Vatican, as am I , but it doesn't really involve defiance when its edicts don't apply to us in the first place, I would think.
And why should we care if you think we are on the right track? You might try convincing us you have a clue as to what you're talking about before dispensing your opinions on how we're doing track-wise as though they carry any weight.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.