Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 3, 2025, 1:07 pm
Atheist Forums › Community › Atheism v
"Science does not offer one guidance for how to live" <---- WRONG.

Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
"Science does not offer one guidance for how to live" <---- WRONG.
Sinbad Offline
Newbie
*
Religious Views: Rhubarb
Posts: 58
Threads: 1
Joined: December 14, 2013
Reputation: 2
#11
RE: "Science does not offer one guidance for how to live" <---- WRONG.
July 22, 2014 at 2:23 pm
Don't eat yellow snow.
Find
Reply
vodkafan Offline
Junior Member
**
Religious Views: Ask yourself what would Jesus do? Would he wear socks with sandals? No.
Posts: 292
Threads: 18
Joined: May 29, 2014
Reputation: 6
#12
RE: "Science does not offer one guidance for how to live" <---- WRONG.
July 22, 2014 at 4:07 pm
Who ever said that science was supposed to offer life guidance?
It's not immoral to eat meat, abort a fetus or love someone of the same sex...I think that about covers it
Find
Reply
Mudhammam Offline
Disciple of Nature
****
Religious Views: anti-theist (towards 98.5% of deities)
Posts: 5399
Threads: 256
Joined: December 1, 2013
Reputation: 60
#13
RE: "Science does not offer one guidance for how to live" <---- WRONG.
July 22, 2014 at 5:01 pm
(July 22, 2014 at 4:07 pm)vodkafan Wrote: Who ever said that science was supposed to offer life guidance?

The practice itself?
This was actually more directed to those atheists and believers who disingenuously claim NOMA; that is, that religion offers guidance on how to live whereas the scientific method does not.
He who loves God cannot endeavour that God should love him in return - Baruch Spinoza
Find
Reply
ignoramus Offline
wiggle wiggle
*****
Religious Views: n/a
Posts: 20476
Threads: 447
Joined: June 16, 2014
Reputation: 111
#14
RE: "Science does not offer one guidance for how to live" <---- WRONG.
July 22, 2014 at 8:39 pm
Nature itself is the ultimate teacher.
"Life" is the test.
No prior practicing allowed.
Field tests come first.
Theory comes second (if you survive the field)

Hence the saying:
That which does not kill you, almost fucking kills you!
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.
Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Community › Atheism v
"Science does not offer one guidance for how to live" <---- WRONG.

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  How may one refute the religious stonewall argument "all is one"? Osopatata 29 3464 December 21, 2020 at 4:05 pm
Last Post: HappySkeptic
  What is wrong with theistic beliefs? Whateverist 65 9247 November 30, 2018 at 5:04 am
Last Post: Gwaithmir
  Argument from "You did it wrong" zipperpull 13 2340 May 23, 2018 at 4:04 pm
Last Post: Simon Moon
  Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! Whateverist 123 41030 May 15, 2017 at 9:05 am
Last Post: Whateverist
  Let us think why humanity developed several religions but only one science? Nishant 10 3369 January 4, 2017 at 1:42 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  2014 article in online science journal: "Atheists Might Not Exist" Whateverist 15 4524 July 4, 2016 at 9:06 pm
Last Post: The Valkyrie
  Using the word "believe" wrong... maestroanth 8 2294 June 25, 2016 at 9:47 pm
Last Post: SteveII
  Responding to "Homosexuality is wrong, the same way incest is wrong" JewishAthiest 106 28572 February 9, 2016 at 3:48 pm
Last Post: robvalue
  Do atheists like Atheist Roo have anything useful to offer the Atheist community? IanHulett 21 7928 January 1, 2016 at 10:33 am
Last Post: TheRocketSurgeon
  Science and Religion not in direct conflict? maestroanth 26 6138 December 31, 2015 at 10:35 pm
Last Post: Brian37



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)