Posts: 3837
Threads: 197
Joined: August 28, 2013
Reputation:
38
RE: Post count requirement for starting a thread.
September 21, 2014 at 12:23 am
(September 20, 2014 at 11:38 pm)Drich Wrote: What if you created a sub forum for spam?
The world will be ending next Saturday. How do I know, its because I'm about to agree with drich. We should still bam spammers, but instead of locking the thread, move it too a spam sub forum for all to mock. I think this may deter some spammers.
To-morrow, and to-morrow, and to-morrow,
Creeps in this petty pace from day to day,
To the last syllable of recorded time;
And all our yesterdays have lighted fools
The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle!
Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player,
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage,
And then is heard no more. It is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing.
Posts: 28384
Threads: 226
Joined: March 24, 2014
Reputation:
185
RE: Post count requirement for starting a thread.
September 21, 2014 at 2:22 am
No it wouldn't. What would a troll love more than to be made famous and to get to live on even after they die.
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay
0/10
Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
Posts: 19552
Threads: 177
Joined: July 31, 2012
Reputation:
92
RE: Post count requirement for starting a thread.
September 21, 2014 at 3:29 am
(This post was last modified: September 21, 2014 at 3:50 am by pocaracas.)
If troll can't create new threads, then troll spams his trash on existing threads... I'd say that's a bit more disruptive than the new threads...but that's just me.
Posts: 13392
Threads: 187
Joined: March 18, 2012
Reputation:
48
RE: Post count requirement for starting a thread.
September 22, 2014 at 12:51 am
(September 20, 2014 at 11:59 pm)Stimbo Wrote: (September 20, 2014 at 11:38 pm)Drich Wrote: What if you created a sub forum for spam?
It would only give the spammers one more place to dump their shit. Are you volunteering to clear it all from the rest of the forum and move it into there?
See, it would be nice if spammers played by the rules. Then we wouldn't need to deal with it at all.
Or just give them an oppertunity/a place to post their crap. If they don't then do what you normally do.
...and I'll pass on your offer to be a mod, thanks anyway.
(Even if you don't want to goto the party it is till nice being asked.)
Posts: 11260
Threads: 61
Joined: January 5, 2013
Reputation:
123
RE: Post count requirement for starting a thread.
September 22, 2014 at 1:00 am
(September 21, 2014 at 12:23 am)Lemonvariable72 Wrote: The world will be ending next Saturday. How do I know, its because I'm about to agree with drich. We should still bam spammers, but instead of locking the thread, move it too a spam sub forum for all to mock. I think this may deter some spammers.
That really depends on the content of the spam: the advertising ones would probably prefer that their threads linger, and get looked upon. Any attention is good attention, there.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
156
RE: Post count requirement for starting a thread.
September 22, 2014 at 1:40 am
Don't get carried away, Drich, I wasn't offering you a staff job. Merely the use of my mop.
The point I was making is that having a dedicated spam thread not only makes extra work for staff, who are all unpaid and do this job in addition to having real lives, but also carries an unrealistic expectation of a typical spammer. A person whose sole intent is to use this place for free advertising isn't likely to be interested in where they do it. That of course goes not only double but through the roof for spambots. Combine that with the fact that we are not an advertising host, plus the fact that every link posted will have to get the snip.
Bottom line is to ask why we ought to countenance setting aside a specialised area where people can break the rules.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 69248
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
259
RE: Post count requirement for starting a thread.
September 22, 2014 at 1:53 am
Quote:The point I was making is that having a dedicated spam thread not only makes extra work for staff, who are all unpaid and do this job in addition to having real lives, but also carries an unrealistic expectation of a typical spammer.
Ban them on sight, I say.
![[Image: avatar6789_1.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=www.akfiles.org%2Fforums%2Fcustomavatars%2Favatar6789_1.gif)
Hanging's too good for them.
Posts: 6990
Threads: 89
Joined: January 6, 2012
Reputation:
104
RE: Post count requirement for starting a thread.
September 22, 2014 at 5:38 pm
Overall, I think this is a non-issue. We deal with spam when it arrives and I think we do a good job.
I'd go for it if there was some added value, but I can't see any.
Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
156
RE: Post count requirement for starting a thread.
September 22, 2014 at 7:30 pm
(This post was last modified: September 22, 2014 at 7:35 pm by Cyberman.)
(September 22, 2014 at 1:53 am)Minimalist Wrote: Ban them on sight, I say.
Hanging's too good for them.
I quite agree. Bloody staff.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 6191
Threads: 124
Joined: November 13, 2009
Reputation:
70
RE: Post count requirement for starting a thread.
September 22, 2014 at 9:49 pm
One consequence of a required post count is that spam will have a tendency to be buried in legitimate threads.
I find it hard to believe common forum spambots do not handle this case.
Slave to the Patriarchy no more
|
![[Image: 146748944129044_zpsomrzyn3d.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i629.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fuu13%2FRXM843%2F146748944129044_zpsomrzyn3d.gif)
