Is it needs a leader, a central figure... without that, it acts like an unruly mob.. some parts respect the law, other parts just kick off...
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 24, 2024, 3:30 am
Thread Rating:
|
Islams problem..
|
I think that's true.
 (October 5, 2014 at 5:52 pm)lifesagift Wrote: Is it needs a leader, a central figure... without that, it acts like an unruly mob.. some parts respect the law, other parts just kick off... Remember, Christianity went through this centuries ago. The problem here is that they are doing what the Christians did but with 21st century weapons. Part of the problem, also, as far as I'm concerned, is the fact that many are not just divided on religious lines but tribal lines as well. Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni: "You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???" 
H. L. Mencken made this observation:
Quote: “The trouble with Communism is the Communists, just as the trouble with Christianity is the Christians.” Easily extended to islam. 
I have no problem with submission to God.
I just refuse to submit to the people who claim to speak for God. If God needs me to do anything, It can pick up the phone and speak to me directly.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too." ... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept "(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question" ... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist  (October 5, 2014 at 5:58 pm)Beccs Wrote: Part of the problem, also, as far as I'm concerned, is the fact that many are not just divided on religious lines but tribal lines as well. Well, Christians were, too.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.  RE: Islams problem..
October 5, 2014 at 10:55 pm
(This post was last modified: October 5, 2014 at 10:57 pm by Anomalocaris.)
(October 5, 2014 at 5:52 pm)lifesagift Wrote: Is it needs a leader, a central figure... without that, it acts like an unruly mob.. some parts respect the law, other parts just kick off... A central figure arising out of a mob like that is unlikely to make Islam less repulsive than what the unruly mob had made it. (October 5, 2014 at 6:56 pm)Minimalist Wrote: H. L. Mencken made this observation: I would think while the first so called christians might have been the original trouble with Christianity, christians itself is a big part of the trouble with latter day christianis. The same with Islam.
Mencken was dealing with 1920's xtians.
Just as we are dealing with 13th century muslims.
I think Christianity has been the problem with christians since about 16th century.
Islam has been the main problem with muslim commsurately more recently, say around middle of twentieth century.
Bat shit fundie xtianity came into its own in the late 19th/early 20th century. When the shitheads sing about "That Old Time Religion" they are really only looking back about 20 years!
The fundie Wahabists in Islam date from the mid 18th century. Granted, the Sufists, like al-Ghazali, put the screws to scientific thought in Baghdad in the 13th century. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
| Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
| Koranic Law Versus Sharia Law - Two different Islams | Bigmo | 10 | 4556 |
June 7, 2015 at 11:13 am Last Post: Regina |
|
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
