RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
October 2, 2015 at 11:32 am
(This post was last modified: October 2, 2015 at 11:32 am by Losty.)
Yes and his restroom privileges!
Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
|
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
October 2, 2015 at 11:32 am
(This post was last modified: October 2, 2015 at 11:32 am by Losty.)
Yes and his restroom privileges!
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
October 2, 2015 at 11:40 am
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
October 2, 2015 at 11:40 am
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
October 2, 2015 at 11:46 am
(October 2, 2015 at 1:43 am)Nestor Wrote: I'm kind of annoyed that Randy was banned. Jenny says she banned him for plagriarism and that this was a majority decision... Ok. For one, it seems like a pretty silly offense, and even if you want to justify such a ban per the rules of the forum (which I would criticize in Randy's case, as he always engaged specific critiques), why disallow PMs? I recommend that you start arguing with lkingpinl. He is full of silly beliefs, which makes him a bit like Randy, but he is very much unlike Randy in tone and demeanor. lkingpinl is generally very pleasant. (One can easily imagine him as an excellent next-door neighbor.) Unless you liked rude and obnoxious, lkingpinl should be a better option anyway. I will be very much surprised if he is ever banned. I am also rather surprised that you regard plagiarism as a "silly offense." Aside from being illegal in most jurisdictions (including the jurisdiction of this forum, if my memory is correct of which jurisdiction applies to this forum), you might want to think about how your professors would react to you turning in a plagiarized term paper. It is not difficult to put a quote in a quote box, or put quotation marks around something, and give credit to the rightful author. So it is silly that he refused to do that, when he was repeatedly warned that it was something for which one could be banned. I believe just quotation marks and link (or name of author) would satisfy the requirements of this site. It is not like there is a troublesome exacting academic notation that is expected of anyone. "A wise man ... proportions his belief to the evidence." — David Hume, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Section X, Part I.
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
October 2, 2015 at 11:55 am
Kingpin is indeed my most favourite lunatic
![]() ![]() If you have any serious concerns, are being harassed, or just need someone to talk to, feel free to contact me via PM RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
October 2, 2015 at 11:57 am
(October 2, 2015 at 11:46 am)Pyrrho Wrote:(October 2, 2015 at 1:43 am)Nestor Wrote: I'm kind of annoyed that Randy was banned. Jenny says she banned him for plagriarism and that this was a majority decision... Ok. For one, it seems like a pretty silly offense, and even if you want to justify such a ban per the rules of the forum (which I would criticize in Randy's case, as he always engaged specific critiques), why disallow PMs? Nestor and I have had some discussions before. I have to say I enjoy discussion with both Nestor and Pyrrho. Their weapon is their mind and they use it well. ![]() I couldn't act like Randy if I tried. I don't believe in preaching to people or telling people they are wrong. Disagree with conclusions, sure. But hey we're all still people. Cya around neighbors! ![]()
We are not made happy by what we acquire but by what we appreciate.
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
October 2, 2015 at 11:58 am
We are not made happy by what we acquire but by what we appreciate.
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
October 2, 2015 at 12:39 pm
(October 2, 2015 at 11:57 am)lkingpinl Wrote:(October 2, 2015 at 11:46 am)Pyrrho Wrote: I recommend that you start arguing with lkingpinl. He is full of silly beliefs, which makes him a bit like Randy, but he is very much unlike Randy in tone and demeanor. lkingpinl is generally very pleasant. (One can easily imagine him as an excellent next-door neighbor.) Unless you liked rude and obnoxious, lkingpinl should be a better option anyway. I will be very much surprised if he is ever banned. Case in point.
I can't remember where this verse is from, I think it got removed from canon:
"I don't hang around with mostly men because I'm gay. It's because men are better than women. Better trained, better equipped...better. Just better! I'm not gay." For context, this is the previous verse: "Hi Jesus" -robvalue RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
October 2, 2015 at 12:54 pm
(October 2, 2015 at 11:46 am)Pyrrho Wrote: I recommend that you start arguing with lkingpinl. He is full of silly beliefs, which makes him a bit like Randy, but he is very much unlike Randy in tone and demeanor. lkingpinl is generally very pleasant. (One can easily imagine him as an excellent next-door neighbor.) Unless you liked rude and obnoxious, lkingpinl should be a better option anyway. I will be very much surprised if he is ever banned. Kingpin to me is kind of like Homer Simpson's neighbor Flanders, except that if Kingpin were my neighbor, I wouldn't be tempted to punch him. I might even invite him over to watch my football team beat up on his. ![]() RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
October 2, 2015 at 12:58 pm
(October 2, 2015 at 12:54 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote:(October 2, 2015 at 11:46 am)Pyrrho Wrote: I recommend that you start arguing with lkingpinl. He is full of silly beliefs, which makes him a bit like Randy, but he is very much unlike Randy in tone and demeanor. lkingpinl is generally very pleasant. (One can easily imagine him as an excellent next-door neighbor.) Unless you liked rude and obnoxious, lkingpinl should be a better option anyway. I will be very much surprised if he is ever banned. Flanders? LOL that's one I haven't heard before. I'm certainly not that annoying, but I'll take it. CD, I certainly hope the Hawks take it easy on our poor lowly Leo's.
We are not made happy by what we acquire but by what we appreciate.
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|