Posts: 23061
Threads: 26
Joined: February 2, 2010
Reputation:
106
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 1, 2018 at 2:18 am
(January 1, 2018 at 1:19 am)Tiberius Wrote: (January 1, 2018 at 12:47 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: I've kudosed her over the last few months for the occasional thoughtful post. Doesn't seem to make any difference to her.
Here it is that she's being obviously rude immediately after an argument that saw us both penalized, and you're excusing her behavior? Seriously, Tibs. I've been civil, she's called me a jackass, and you're chastising me? Get real. This is horseshit and you know it.
SHE GAVE YOU A KUDOS AND THEN IN HER POST RESPONDING TO IT SHE CALLED YOU A JACKASS.
Does that make any sense if it wasn't a joke? No.
Stop being so dense.
Generally speaking, I bust stones with friends. A buddy calls me a jackass, no problem. But really -- after the last couple of days, you expect that I should yuk it up simply because she says she's just joking after all her invective?
I'm not being "dense", I'm being skeptical, and rightfully so, especially considering the absence of any olive branch. I might have fallen off'n the cabbage truck, but I didn't fall off yesterday.
Posts: 8274
Threads: 47
Joined: September 12, 2015
Reputation:
42
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 1, 2018 at 7:09 am
(December 31, 2017 at 7:47 pm)Whateverist Wrote: knock on wood
Ow, my head!
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli
Home
Posts: 28323
Threads: 523
Joined: June 16, 2015
Reputation:
90
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 1, 2018 at 7:42 am
(December 31, 2017 at 11:03 pm)Hammy Wrote: Sigh. So many people interpret a difference of opinion as an attack. And that's what I mean by the not being open to feedback. It's not like the feedback is simply disagreed with, it's more like "How dare you disagree! You're being pissy because you don't agree! Time to turn on the condescending asshat attitude for no good reason."
This place is gonna go beyond a Safe Space turn into a flat out echo chamber at this rate. Which is what I would have thought is exactly the opposite of what the prime directive is supposed to support.
Shadup Ham. I don't have to take that from the likes of you.
Piss Off. Now.
Ben Dover.
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
Posts: 1227
Threads: 6
Joined: September 17, 2017
Reputation:
23
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 1, 2018 at 7:55 am
there're a lot of interesting things being posted right now in the men's rights movement thread started by catholic lady. hahahaha in your face thump and shell b. missing out on the recent action. since you got banned it's like a area 69 in there
Posts: 5690
Threads: 8
Joined: April 3, 2014
Reputation:
68
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 1, 2018 at 8:31 am
Just a suggestion, instead of bans or thread bans, why not put the people who are fighting on ignore of each other for a few weeks?
I have opinions on what's been posted on this thread over the last few pages, but I'm gonna keep it to myself.
I will say, Shell, that pic you have of you with the cat ears and nose, you look lovely, beautiful eyes.
Posts: 12806
Threads: 158
Joined: February 13, 2010
Reputation:
111
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 1, 2018 at 10:21 am
Thanks LL. If the ignore function made it so other people couldn’t see me, I would use it.
Thump, a joke is an olive branch. I’m happy to rescind it if you just want to carry on being mad.
Thena, your accusations of favoritism are hyperbolic and the reason so much animosity exists between us. It’s crazy how wrong you are and how adamant you remain.
Posts: 19644
Threads: 177
Joined: July 31, 2012
Reputation:
92
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 1, 2018 at 10:28 am
Ah....new year forum drama!
Enjoy it now... You get to have more only next year! 
Posts: 15351
Threads: 118
Joined: January 13, 2014
Reputation:
117
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 1, 2018 at 11:25 am
Jaysus.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
Posts: 23061
Threads: 26
Joined: February 2, 2010
Reputation:
106
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 1, 2018 at 11:30 am
(This post was last modified: January 1, 2018 at 11:30 am by Thumpalumpacus.)
(January 1, 2018 at 10:21 am)Shell B Wrote: Thump, a joke is an olive branch. I’m happy to rescind it if you just want to carry on being mad.
When your joke follows on the heels of your insults, and it contains an insult, expecting the butt of your joke to suss out your intention (especially in a text-only conversation) is unrealistic, to put it charitably.
I detest arguing, but taking swipes and then backing off with a "just joking" is, well ... never mind -- you already know what I think of it. You have a nice day now.
Posts: 12806
Threads: 158
Joined: February 13, 2010
Reputation:
111
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 1, 2018 at 11:46 am
It’s official. You’re ridiculous. There’s naught to be done for it. I wouldn’t have signaled I was kidding by giving you kudos and saying I agree with you if I was being serious, but it’s doesn’t matter. I could have come out and virtually bowed to you and you would have found flaw. You’re lying when you say you prefer civil discourse. You are the agent of this uncivil discourse because you enjoy it. It’s never been more obvious than now. When you see me in the forum, do not respond to me. I will treat every response from you as continued flaming and report it in the interest of preventing more of this nonsense. I will not respond. Goodbye, Trumpalump.
|
