Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
|
Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
|
 RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 1, 2018 at 7:45 pm
Quote:If a kudos meant "I read this" I need to kudos way more.It's the way i use it . I also tend to use it when i agree with one sentence in a paragraph . Thou i admit it can cause confusion .
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb  RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 1, 2018 at 7:52 pm
 RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 1, 2018 at 8:20 pm
(January 1, 2018 at 7:52 pm)Shell B Wrote:(January 1, 2018 at 7:15 pm)Hammy Wrote: I don't think anyone here is being despicable. You even have a fake lady mask when really you're a bald German guy with a swastika tattoo on your forehead.  RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 1, 2018 at 10:58 pm
Moderator Notice
Thread closed for everyone for a couple of days. This conversation is not productive at all.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<--- RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 2, 2018 at 12:09 am
Moderator Notice
After discussion, staff has decided not to lock the thread, but instead to strongly insist that any further bickering over topics not related to the Ban Log or associated staff action be taken to R'lyeh.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---  RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 2, 2018 at 12:09 am
(This post was last modified: January 2, 2018 at 12:11 am by brewer.)
(January 1, 2018 at 10:58 pm)SteelCurtain Wrote: No it's not. Unless I'm just extra special. Edit: SC ninja, damn it! Not special (sniff sniff).
I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem.
 RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 2, 2018 at 10:48 am
(This post was last modified: January 2, 2018 at 10:54 am by Thumpalumpacus.)
(January 1, 2018 at 2:10 pm)Tiberius Wrote:(January 1, 2018 at 12:32 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: Listen, I'm just trying to tell you that your intentions aren't plain in this medium. A kudos can mean agreement, laughter, "i read this", a lot of different things. Expecting anyone to suss these things out when you're being vague in a text-only format is just unreasonable, as is expecting them to differentiate between a joking insult and an insult laid in seriousness, which we had just been doing. They can mean many things, is my point. Coming from someone so obviously antagonistic, I will of course question why they might be doing that. (January 1, 2018 at 2:10 pm)Tiberius Wrote: Also, she told you she was joking like 4 times. Nobody is expecting you to suss these things out when they are flat out telling you they are joking. It's fine if you don't get the joke the first time around, but she literally pointed it out, and the fact that she gave you kudos to the post is a big hint as well. I don't know anyone who goes around giving kudos to people they are planning on insulting in the very next post. That's not the point of a kudos at all. Don't piss on my leg and call it rainwater. Joking insults are passed between friends, and your wife has made it abundantly clear that she does not regard me as a friend. She should perhaps try a little of that friendly stuff before trying to pass that off as friendly banter. This is the last I will discuss this. You either get it or you don't. RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 2, 2018 at 10:58 am
Quote:strongly insist that any further bickering over topics not related to the Ban Log or associated staff action be taken to R'lyeh.  RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 2, 2018 at 10:59 am
Guys, think twice about arguing and being serious in a thread titled: peanut gallery commentary
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
![[Image: 2dm8n01.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=s7.tinypic.com%2F2dm8n01.jpg)
