Posts: 116
Threads: 0
Joined: October 17, 2014
Reputation:
0
RE: "But what about the moderates?"
November 25, 2014 at 3:42 pm
<struggles to understand how deism isn't also "magical thinking and credence to beliefs about sky daddies">
Posts: 69247
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
259
RE: "But what about the moderates?"
November 25, 2014 at 3:48 pm
(This post was last modified: November 25, 2014 at 3:50 pm by Minimalist.)
Who said otherwise?
The thing with deists is that they rarely try to poison our schools with their bullshit or bring useless literature to my door or annoy the living fuck out of me playing their vapid music for two months of the year in every store I go into.
I wish there were more deists and fewer jesus or allah freaks.
Posts: 5336
Threads: 198
Joined: June 24, 2010
Reputation:
77
RE: "But what about the moderates?"
November 25, 2014 at 5:08 pm
(This post was last modified: November 25, 2014 at 5:11 pm by DeistPaladin.)
(November 25, 2014 at 3:42 pm)TreeSapNest Wrote: <struggles to understand how deism isn't also "magical thinking and credence to beliefs about sky daddies">
Well, partly there's the practical application as Min alluded to. As far as how I live my life, evaluate morality, derive meaning, etc. nothing would change if I were to shift to atheism. It's basically atheism with poetic flourishes.
For me, it's a compromise between my skeptical brain and lofty sentiments about nature and the human potential, a way to have such spirituality yet keep it all grounded in the natural universe. Luckily for me, the natural universe provides a far greater sense of wonder than anything in the Bible or other "sacred" texts. God for deists is less a personal sky-daddy and more the mysterious X-factor behind the natural order as well as all that came together in our evolution that enabled us to have this advanced civilization.
Most atheists I've spoken with have the same sense of wonder about the natural universe as well as the same hope for human civilization. They just don't need the word "God".
EDIT TO ADD: Deists couldn't advocate cruel traditions that "purify" one in the afterlife or acts of violence to "save souls". Most of us don't believe in an afterlife (I don't). Those who do have only fuzzy concepts of it.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
Posts: 299
Threads: 20
Joined: September 30, 2013
Reputation:
17
RE: "But what about the moderates?"
November 26, 2014 at 4:24 pm
(This post was last modified: November 26, 2014 at 4:25 pm by xpastor.)
Today there was a phone-in show on that ridiculous term [Muslim] "radicalization" but I will give them kudos for choosing the "call of the day" made by an EX-Muslim.
http://podcast.cbc.ca/mp3/podcasts/ontar..._42273.mp3
If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people — House
Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: "But what about the moderates?"
November 26, 2014 at 4:48 pm
Would you call someone who followed their employee handbook as accurately as possible a radical or extremist? I'd call them a good employee.
Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: "But what about the moderates?"
November 26, 2014 at 10:14 pm
(This post was last modified: November 26, 2014 at 10:14 pm by robvalue.)
Wait, I got another one.
A moderate is someone who talks like they believe their religion is good and true.
A radical is someone who acts like they believe their religion is good and true.