Posts: 46417
Threads: 540
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: The naturalistic fallacy and masturbation
October 31, 2014 at 3:13 pm
(October 30, 2014 at 10:18 pm)Beccs Wrote: (October 30, 2014 at 4:23 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Masturbation is good for lots of reasons, but being natural isn't what makes it good.
1. You don't have to talk afterwards.
2. You don't have to walk home in the dark.
3. You're always 'a sure thing'.
4. You don't have to wait til her husband's out of town.
Lots of things are 'natural' - head lice, shitting out of doors, being eaten by wolves, etc. - but being natural makes something neither good nor desirable.
Boru
But if your hand falls asleep, is that the ultimate rejection?
Yes, but you can switch hands. Technically, this can either be revenge sex or rebound sex, depending on how deeply the original hand-rejection hurt you.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Posts: 7045
Threads: 20
Joined: June 17, 2014
Reputation:
55
RE: The naturalistic fallacy and masturbation
October 31, 2014 at 3:13 pm
I use both hands, I'm polyhanderous.
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson
Posts: 46417
Threads: 540
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: The naturalistic fallacy and masturbation
October 31, 2014 at 3:20 pm
(October 31, 2014 at 3:13 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: I use both hands, I'm polyhanderous.
Sometimes, when I switch hands, I feel like I'm cheating and have to buy one hand some flowers or lie to the other hand about where I've been.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
