Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 27, 2024, 8:45 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
For Creationists.
#41
RE: For Creationists.
Chas, your post above makes me recall the phrase:
"Science falsely so called".
The shoe fits.

Esq, I think I have seen KUSA's dog pic before, and it's great.
Sure, we could still have wolves and dogs together- that would fit in both Evolution and Creation sequences.
Reply
#42
RE: For Creationists.
(November 16, 2014 at 6:52 pm)professor Wrote: Esq, I think I have seen KUSA's dog pic before, and it's great.

It is super great, yeah. Big Grin

Quote:Sure, we could still have wolves and dogs together- that would fit in both Evolution and Creation sequences.

Wait, what? Dogs are the product of wolves that had been domesticated and selectively bred over centuries; that's one kind breeding into another kind, by any measure. Kinds are still irrelevant to the process of course, but if you're looking for an example that's as good a one as any.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee

Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Reply
#43
RE: For Creationists.
Good one Esq. You got me.
I could say dogs and wolves can breed, but we do call them by different names.
Reply
#44
RE: For Creationists.
I would like to hear how a creationist would explain a horse and a donkey breeding infertile offspring, within their concept of kind?
I can't remember where this verse is from, I think it got removed from canon:

"I don't hang around with mostly men because I'm gay. It's because men are better than women. Better trained, better equipped...better. Just better! I'm not gay."

For context, this is the previous verse:

"Hi Jesus" -robvalue
Reply
#45
RE: For Creationists.
(November 16, 2014 at 10:31 pm)professor Wrote: Good one Esq. You got me.
I could say dogs and wolves can breed, but we do call them by different names.

Well, that's why the first thing I did was ask what goes into deciding what animal goes in what kind, so I could know where the lines are. Nobody who actually uses the word seriously seems to want to give me a straight answer, however. It's weird.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee

Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Reply
#46
RE: For Creationists.
(November 14, 2014 at 5:59 pm)Lemonvariable72 Wrote: Most of you believe in micro evolution. So for those of you that do, you must understand all macro evolution is is simply micro evolution that has accumulated. In other words its simply small changes time. Think of it like the gray scale on your TV. Can you point to one block and say this is where black became white? Of course not
Not that I have clear that up on to the question at hand. If micro evolution is true and the changes occur, then what is the mechanism that stops resets the changes so as too stop a change of kinds?

Thinking if they believe in micro evolution they almost must agree over millions of years of micro evolution the species would be radically different. so there is no point of saying i believe in micro evolution just say you believe in evolution.
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today. 


Code:
<iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&amp;auto_play=false&amp;hide_related=false&amp;show_comments=true&amp;show_user=true&amp;show_reposts=false&amp;visual=true"></iframe>
Reply
#47
RE: For Creationists.
But then where are all the crocoducks?
Poe's Law: "Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humor, it is impossible to create a parody of Fundamentalism that SOMEONE won't mistake for the real thing."

10 Christ-like figures that predate Jesus. Link shortened to Chris ate Jesus for some reason...
http://listverse.com/2009/04/13/10-chris...ate-jesus/

Good video to watch, if you want to know how common the Jesus story really is.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88GTUXvp-50

A list of biblical contradictions from the infallible word of Yahweh.
http://infidels.org/library/modern/jim_m...tions.html

Reply
#48
RE: For Creationists.
(November 17, 2014 at 12:16 am)Chad32 Wrote: But then where are all the crocoducks?

You didn't get the invite? I satan made them all for bbq last week. damn good eating.

Now back on track
What is the mechanism that stop micro evolution from becoming macro evolution?
To-morrow, and to-morrow, and to-morrow,
Creeps in this petty pace from day to day,
To the last syllable of recorded time;
And all our yesterdays have lighted fools
The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle!
Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player,
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage,
And then is heard no more. It is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing.
Reply
#49
RE: For Creationists.
Cheech, the mechanism limiting micro from becoming macro is the genetic code.
Just like your computer.
The pre-existing code allows different programs (genetic variations) to run.
It doesn't allow Mac programs to run on Bill Gates' stuff, which is why the only crockaduck you will find
is an illustration in logic.
Reply
#50
RE: For Creationists.
(November 17, 2014 at 8:59 am)professor Wrote: It doesn't allow Mac programs to run on Bill Gates' stuff, which is why the only crockaduck you will find
is an illustration in logic.

You don't even know your computer well enough to construct a valid analogy. Just saying.
[Image: Bumper+Sticker+-+Asheville+-+Praise+Dog3.JPG]
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  the real reason creationists hate evolution? drfuzzy 22 8070 October 6, 2015 at 11:39 pm
Last Post: dyresand
  Do we have any creationists here? Lemonvariable72 85 15918 April 1, 2015 at 9:15 pm
Last Post: watchamadoodle
  Why don't Christians/Creationists attack luingistic science? Simon Moon 2 1469 May 25, 2014 at 11:39 am
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  What if there weren't Creationists???? The Reality Salesman01 18 6895 August 3, 2013 at 1:10 pm
Last Post: Rahul
  The Creationists' Nightmare Gooders1002 134 56108 June 16, 2012 at 6:02 pm
Last Post: Taqiyya Mockingbird
  Question About Creationists Phil 96 71204 June 3, 2012 at 6:36 pm
Last Post: Gooders1002
Question To Christians who aren't creationists Tea Earl Grey Hot 146 74117 May 19, 2012 at 4:06 am
Last Post: Oldandeasilyconfused



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)