Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: October 31, 2026, 8:32 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Moon Landing conspiracy
#81
RE: Moon Landing conspiracy
(December 9, 2014 at 8:29 am)Tonus Wrote:
(December 8, 2014 at 11:32 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: Something similar actually exists, though not as small as in Thunderball. Tell you what though, as an experienced deep diver, I would not ever carry one - my redundant tank has between 5 and 40 times the capacity - and is usually strapped to my dive buddy's back. I have no delusion that there's enough air in one of those tiny tanks to get safely to the surface from 40 meters depth.
Or just do what Lara Croft did in that Tomb Raider movie-- cut your hand, wait for a shark to swim up to you, punch it in the face, then grab its dorsal fin (because punching a shark in the face will make it swim to the surface). Presto! You're saved.

Heh, if you're breathing on SCUBA, more like "Presto! You're bent. Hope you enjoy a trip to the hyperbaric chamber, or emboli."
Reply
#82
RE: Moon Landing conspiracy
(December 9, 2014 at 4:56 pm)lifesagift Wrote:
(December 9, 2014 at 1:43 am)psychoslice Wrote: I like to use the net so I can laugh at people like you lol.ROFLOL

Feel free my friend.. lol. Glad I've been of use to you today !
(and if you were trying to put me down, you missed!)

I only reply to people the way they reply to me, now be nice.Angel Cloud
Reply
#83
RE: Moon Landing conspiracy
My big problem with the moon landing is I am an audio engineer and I cannot believe for one second that they could sit in a 1/2" thick aluminum can 6 feet away from a 140 decible 10,000lb thrust rocket engine and talk on a radio.
No fing way. there is no sound in space but there sure as hell is inside the suit. It would sound like you were inside a thunderbolt.
and when you watch them land you see dust i guess kicking up like crazy but then you look at the pictures of where they landed and not even a small crater or spread of dust. just perfect fine powder that makes footprints with not one spec of dust on the lander. not even on the loosely wrapped aluminum foil duct taped on the footpads.
[snip]
Yeah right.
my favorite movie on it is called A Funny Thing Happened On the Way to The Moon
its online on youtube and such places easy to find. It's a good one.
Reply
#84
RE: Moon Landing conspiracy
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
#85
RE: Moon Landing conspiracy
(December 31, 2014 at 12:11 am)Charles Xavier Wrote: My big problem with the moon landing is I am an audio engineer and I cannot believe for one second that they could sit in a 1/2" thick aluminum can 6 feet away from a 140 decible 10,000lb thrust rocket engine and talk on a radio.
No fing way. there is no sound in space but there sure as hell is inside the suit. It would sound like you were inside a thunderbolt.
and when you watch them land you see dust i guess kicking up like crazy but then you look at the pictures of where they landed and not even a small crater or spread of dust. just perfect fine powder that makes footprints with not one spec of dust on the lander. not even on the loosely wrapped aluminum foil duct taped on the footpads.
[snip]
Yeah right.
my favorite movie on it is called A Funny Thing Happened On the Way to The Moon
its online on youtube and such places easy to find. It's a good one.

So what you are saying is that this video of two people having a conversation in the cockpit of an F16 in the atmosphere in afterburner is impossible because the 23,000 lb thrust engine would be too loud?

Save a life. Adopt a greyhound.
[Image: JUkLw58.gif]
Reply
#86
RE: Moon Landing conspiracy
yeah i saw that Astronauts gone wild video lol
That guy has balls the size of watermelons man Big Grin

But it is more than him. there is some other pretty merfed up stuff about it i can guess you will already have a link to counter it so i won't bother to mention any of it but did you ever watch A Funny thing Happened on The Way to The Moon?
It is real good.

(December 31, 2014 at 12:51 am)popeyespappy Wrote: So what you are saying is that this video of two people having a conversation in the cockpit of an F16 in in the atmosphere in afterburner is impossible because because the 23,000 lb thrust engine would be too loud?


nah man I am saying 3 guys in a 1/2" aluminum can made in the 1960's literally sitting on top of a flaming rocket engine.
A jet wouldn't vibrate the same way as there is much dampening and isolation of the vibrations between the pilot and the source.
Put the jet engine right behind the pilots back in a one piece 1/2" think aluminum shell and try that radio again. It isn't even discernable in the audio as they land.
Reply
#87
RE: Moon Landing conspiracy
You didn't see my post, did you?

And Sibrel's video has all the credibility of Loose Change, Zeitgeist and Expelled (ie none at all).
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
#88
RE: Moon Landing conspiracy
I don't believe they ever went to the moon, but that
is my opinion.
Reply
#89
RE: Moon Landing conspiracy
Regarding noisy rockets and microphones: Tankers in WWII used throat mikes, sound went almost directly from the vocal cords to the mike. Communication above the sounds of unmuffled tank engines and combat sounds was very clear. A sound engineer would know this.
Reply
#90
RE: Moon Landing conspiracy
So, do you these conspiracies typically doubt all of the moon landings, or simply Apollo 11?
He who loves God cannot endeavour that God should love him in return - Baruch Spinoza
Reply



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Russian lunar lander added to the number of known craters on the moon. Anomalocaris 17 8428 August 21, 2023 at 8:52 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Moon is part of Mars Anomalocaris 79 23425 June 17, 2019 at 6:47 pm
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  Science Channel, Jupiter, and it's moon Io. Jackie 6 3417 July 9, 2018 at 4:29 pm
Last Post: Jackie
  SpaceX moon trip 2018 Alex K 25 8940 March 4, 2017 at 10:16 pm
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  Moon Landing: Fake or Real? BlackSwordsman 293 101898 August 21, 2014 at 12:32 pm
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  moon landing hoax? xxxtobymac 65 23420 November 5, 2013 at 2:43 pm
Last Post: Doubting Thomas
  Full Sun - Half Moon? Jiggerj 30 13547 October 27, 2013 at 11:13 am
Last Post: Captain Colostomy
  I want me a printed moon house. downbeatplumb 8 5359 February 2, 2013 at 11:29 am
Last Post: Cyberman
  While the US is fighting over the debt, China is planning to go to the moon little_monkey 20 15905 January 4, 2012 at 6:33 pm
Last Post: Welsh cake



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)