MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)

[Thumpalumpacus]

[Cyberman]

You will need someone far more credible than him, because seriously, he's laughed at and scorned in the scholarly community.

Need more well-poison? I know a good supplier. For a price.

[Free]

[The Valkyrie]

[abaris]

You atheists- who propagate reason and rationale religiously- should be utterly ashamed of yourselves for allowing your anti-Christian bias to influence your opinions to such a point as that you are quite willing to crucify reason and rationale by intentionally refusing to acknowledge the almost innumerable logical fallacies Ken Humphreys employs on his website.

I didn't even know Ken Humphreys existed before he was mentioned in this thread. Doesn't change a thing though. My reason (pun intended) tells me, there's absolutely no evidence for the historical Jesus. There's also no evidence for him not having lived.

Doesn't change the fact though, he's a walking collection of preexisting myths.

[Minimalist]

[Free]

[Esquilax]

[Free]

Humphreys from Jesus Never Existed?

Please don't tell me that's how you conclude that Jesus was a Myth? Almost every position he holds is an argument from silence.

Not once does he provide a single stitch of tangible evidence to support his assertions.

All he says is stuff such as, "This guy said nothing, that guy said nothing, this place never existed, yada yada yada."

You will need someone far more credible than him, because seriously, he's laughed at and scorned in the scholarly community.

You know, the fact of the matter is that you will shit on any author who disputes what you believe because....simply....people like you are inherently intellectually dishonest. Facts mean nothing to you.

That is not the "fact of the matter" whatsoever. I pride myself on critical thinking and will not hesitate to expose logical fallacies whenever they present themselves.

There is nothing intellectually dishonest with pointing out the fallacious reasoning and bravado Humprehys employs in abundance. I will even give you a chance to prove me wrong.

Bring me his best argument, just one.

Well lad, I can't find a citation from a webstie called Isuckedjesus'cock.com because those are committed to upholding your point of view. You believe in a scattered selection of your own bullshit and there is nothing that anyone can say which will dissuade you.

Please don't get so upset as to employ fallacious ad hominems and insults. All that ever does is further my point about atheistic extremism.

P.S. when you can come up with evidence that Humphreys is wrong, get back to us.

Like I said, bring me his best argument. Just one.

[Cyberman]