Conservatives: time to apologize

[Heywood]

Just like Al Gore wanted to keep recounting votes in Florida until he came up with a recount he liked....the republicans want to keep investigating until a committee writes a report they like.

He had that legal right, under state law. And vote mining claims were bullshit because all voting recounts involve watchers of both parties.

And the republican have the right to do what they are doing as well. What you are seeing isn't behavior that is exclusive to conservatives.....what you are seeing is political maneuverings.

You shouldn't be so shocked.

[Anomalocaris]

It turns out your endless screeching about Benghazi was what we all thought it was.

http://bigstory.ap.org/article/ecc3a3003...i-theories
http://www.cnn.com/2014/11/21/politics/b...ck-report/

What is this, the sixth congressional investigation that's come up dry? How much in tax dollars have been wasted?

So are conservatives ready to apologize to Obama for all their false accusations? Ready to man up and say, "sorry we accused you of treason or covering anything up and wasting everyone's time and money on this wild goose chase." ?

We're waiting.

Anytime now.

To apologize would mean they have a conscience and the capacity to recognize that facts have an independent existence separate from how they would want things to appear for their own ends.

[Minimalist]

YOu haven't met many conservatards I guess, D-P. Apologies are for pussies. They merely double-down on stupid. Just look at Woodie and Adolf for (bad) examples.

http://www.govexec.com/defense/2014/11/j...oday_pm_nl

When the Republican-led House Intelligence Committee released, via a classic Friday evening news dump, the declassified final report of its bipartisan inquiry into the 2012 Benghazi terrorist attack, Speaker John Boehner's office was silent.

Well, Boehner finally did respond to the Intelligence Committee report, four days later, on Tuesday afternoon. He did so not with a statement commending the panel or accepting its findings, but with an announcement that he was reappointing Chairman Trey Gowdy and the other Republican members of the House Select Committee on Benghazi that he formed that year:

I'm sure that Boner did this as favor to the FOX Fucks who can't live unless they are screeching "BENGHAZI" at the top of their fucking lungs.

[DeistPaladin]

Just look at Woodie and Adolf for (bad) examples.

I think they're not only good examples but an excellent cross-section.

ATheist represents the hard line of the GOP that lives in an alternate reality.

Heywood represents the pseudo-centrist, "Actually, I'm an independent, no really", that seeks to distance themselves from the ATheist types while voting with them in the elections and running cover for them by repeating the "both sides do it" narrative every time the GOP screws everything up.

[Minimalist]

Two bullshit artists.

[DeistPaladin]

Two bullshit artists.

Exactly but of two different breeds they really need each other to survive.

Without pseudo-centrists like Heywood running the "both sides do it" narrative, the GOP would have nowhere to hide.

And of course, without the base, hardcore conservatives like ATheist, there would be no GOP at all.

[Heywood]

Two bullshit artists.

Exactly but of two different breeds they really need each other to survive.

Without pseudo-centrists like Heywood running the "both sides do it" narrative, the GOP would have nowhere to hide.

And of course, without the base, hardcore conservatives like ATheist, there would be no GOP at all.

If the GOP suddenly and magically disappeared, the Democrat party would quickly break up into a least two distinct parties. Without the GOP there would be no Democrat party. The Democrats need the GOP to survive.

[DramaQueen]

At least Libya is famous now (we panic when we hear a foreigner speaking about Libya)

[DeistPaladin]

If the GOP suddenly and magically disappeared, the Democrat party would quickly break up into a least two distinct parties.

Yea!

Progressive Democrats vs. Corporate Democrats? That's my prediction.

[simplemoss]

Why do turds like Heywood always succeed in disrupting the conversation? Instead of talking about how for years now, time and money has been wasted on benghazi but he wants us too talk about al gore. And he gets the response he wants whenever a liberal screams " they're not the same thing!". While he smugly smiles because now we can talk about the differences, which is a conversation he can control. Instead insult and ignore him.

Why is the kkk more concerned about defaming and removing Obama from power?rather than what's "best for the country" because only bleeding heart hippies care about that. Whats best for the "country" is too cheat lie and spend millions getting that nigger out of office