Atheist simulator

[robvalue]

Are you referring to me or Hovind types?

I'm really not sure what goes on in the mind of a Hovind. All he seems concerned with is "winning" the argument, through any means necessary. This generally involves continuing to spout the same stuff until the other party gets bored... Which is what I was trying to demonstrate here.

I don't know if he sees how stupid his own tactics are and doesn't care, or really believes he is doing good work by a genuine method.

I really should have posted the video myself to make my point clearer, sorry for any confusion! Feel free to think I'm a nob head.

[robvalue]

This thread was a stupid idea. Sorry about that.

[Exian]

I like it. Even though you only got to "argue" once and it was against a fellow atheist (I think). Maybe just more time. Or start a new one with less transparency.

[robvalue]

Thank you Well it seems no theist is interested in "debating" me, so I guess I did a fair simulation of a pointless debate and why someone would choose not to take part in it.

Maybe I'll do another one in stealth mode later and see who is awake

Say Hovind, could your God be lying to you? No? You know more than God? Could it be a programmer of a simulation? No? OK.

---

Ok I have one last one, this is airtight.

"I refuse to prove that I exist" says God. "For proof denies faith, and without faith I am nothing."

Ah, but the Babelfish is a dead giveaway isn't it? It proves you exist, and so therefore you don't; QED.

[LivingNumbers6.626]

To add to #2: therefore we don't exist.

Mind... blown.

[robvalue]

If I can prove I don't exist, does that mean I won't exist anymore?

I didn't realize logic was so dangerous. Maybe we need safety guidelines.