RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Ad Neuseum)
December 11, 2014 at 3:22 pm
By the way, nice "cross" examination of the gospels, hehe. They couldn't put Hitler away for mild harrassment with testimony like that.
|
The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Ad Neuseum)
|
|
RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Ad Neuseum)
December 11, 2014 at 3:22 pm
By the way, nice "cross" examination of the gospels, hehe. They couldn't put Hitler away for mild harrassment with testimony like that.
RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Ad Neuseum)
December 11, 2014 at 4:42 pm
(December 11, 2014 at 3:22 pm)robvalue Wrote: By the way, nice "cross" examination of the gospels, hehe. They couldn't put Hitler away for mild harrassment with testimony like that. Ooooh, I hadn't thought of that pun. Nice catch.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too." ... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept "(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question" ... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Ad Neuseum)
December 11, 2014 at 4:58 pm
Thanks
Here's another.Clue: Swedish band can be counted on to swear. Answer: Abbacuss. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|