Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 16, 2024, 6:19 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Detecting design or intent in nature
#91
RE: Detecting design or intent in nature
(January 4, 2015 at 9:42 am)robvalue Wrote: If everything needs a cause, what caused the first cause?

Truth. It was called water early in Gen.1.
Reply
#92
RE: Detecting design or intent in nature
What caused truth?
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
#93
RE: Detecting design or intent in nature
(January 4, 2015 at 11:19 am)Brian37 Wrote:
(January 4, 2015 at 11:15 am)Chili Wrote: Nature does not have a mind, but we do.
We may have red hair too, and get a shave,
and then we no longer have red hair,
So obviously we are not our hair.

^^^^^^^^^^^What the?

None of that steamy pile of a metaphor explains anything.

If a Muslim typed what you just did to claim Allah to be the one true god, would you blindly become a Muslim?

Never, because Mohammad had his angels mixed up and obviously does not know who Gabriel is.
Reply
#94
RE: Detecting design or intent in nature
(January 4, 2015 at 11:19 am)Chili Wrote:
(January 4, 2015 at 9:42 am)robvalue Wrote: If everything needs a cause, what caused the first cause?

Truth. It was called water early in Gen.1.

The bible is not a science textbook, it is antiquated book of myth written by scientifically ignorant people. Genesis alone is a joke claiming men magically popping out of dirt, women magically popping out of a man's rib, talking snakes, talking donkeys, talking bushes on top of treating the sun and moon as separate sources of light.

Quoting any holy book, not just yours, is what is known as "circular reasoning".

Science is not holy book dependent. If you think Christians are the only to try to co op science to prop up invisible sky heros you would be wrong.

(January 4, 2015 at 11:23 am)Chili Wrote:
(January 4, 2015 at 11:19 am)Brian37 Wrote: ^^^^^^^^^^^What the?

None of that steamy pile of a metaphor explains anything.

If a Muslim typed what you just did to claim Allah to be the one true god, would you blindly become a Muslim?

Never, because Mohammad had his angels mixed up and obviously does not know who Gabriel is.

Let me clear things up for you.

There is no Allah, no Yahweh, no God of the bible, no Vishnu, no Thor, no Apollo, naddda........There are merely humans who like what they believe because facing our finite reality is scary to them.
Reply
#95
RE: Detecting design or intent in nature
What caused the thing that caused truth? Saved you an answer there.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
#96
RE: Detecting design or intent in nature
(January 4, 2015 at 11:19 am)robvalue Wrote: Sure is Big Grin

Infinity is an odd concept. Say there's a postman who is delivering mail to the houses down an infinitely long street. If he chooses to go up one side of the street first, he will never get to any of the houses on the other side. But if he covers both sides of the street by alternating, he will eventually get to any house, no matter how far down the street.

I'd stop trying to find out who is responsible for this universe, unless you are trying to lodge a complaint against them.

But the universe does not exists or there would not be room for me to be. The universe is just empty space in the same way as eternity is empty time that is not known until I get there and then will be the continuity of infinity.

(January 4, 2015 at 11:23 am)Brian37 Wrote:
(January 4, 2015 at 11:19 am)Chili Wrote: Truth. It was called water early in Gen.1.

The bible is not a science textbook, it is antiquated book of myth written by scientifically ignorant people. Genesis alone is a joke claiming men magically popping out of dirt, women magically popping out of a man's rib, talking snakes, talking donkeys, talking bushes on top of treating the sun and moon as separate sources of light.

Quoting any holy book, not just yours, is what is known as "circular reasoning".

Science is not holy book dependent. If you think Christians are the only to try to co op science to prop up invisible sky heros you would be wrong.

(January 4, 2015 at 11:23 am)Chili Wrote: Never, because Mohammad had his angels mixed up and obviously does not know who Gabriel is.

Let me clear things up for you.

There is no Allah, no Yahweh, no God of the bible, no Vishnu, no Thor, no Apollo, naddda........There are merely humans who like what they believe because facing our finite reality is scary to them.

I think you have that just backwards because humans only think they are.
Reply
#97
RE: Detecting design or intent in nature
....puff puff pass, Chief.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#98
RE: Detecting design or intent in nature
(January 4, 2015 at 11:33 am)Chili Wrote:
(January 4, 2015 at 11:19 am)robvalue Wrote: Sure is Big Grin

Infinity is an odd concept. Say there's a postman who is delivering mail to the houses down an infinitely long street. If he chooses to go up one side of the street first, he will never get to any of the houses on the other side. But if he covers both sides of the street by alternating, he will eventually get to any house, no matter how far down the street.

I'd stop trying to find out who is responsible for this universe, unless you are trying to lodge a complaint against them.

But the universe does not exists or there would not be room for me to be. The universe is just empty space in the same way as eternity is empty time that is not known until I get there and then will be the continuity of infinity.

(January 4, 2015 at 11:23 am)Brian37 Wrote: The bible is not a science textbook, it is antiquated book of myth written by scientifically ignorant people. Genesis alone is a joke claiming men magically popping out of dirt, women magically popping out of a man's rib, talking snakes, talking donkeys, talking bushes on top of treating the sun and moon as separate sources of light.

Quoting any holy book, not just yours, is what is known as "circular reasoning".

Science is not holy book dependent. If you think Christians are the only to try to co op science to prop up invisible sky heros you would be wrong.


Let me clear things up for you.

There is no Allah, no Yahweh, no God of the bible, no Vishnu, no Thor, no Apollo, naddda........There are merely humans who like what they believe because facing our finite reality is scary to them.

I think you have that just backwards because humans only think they are.

Wrong.

First off when you debate atheists you really need to understand that this is not our first rodeo. I myself have been debating religion online on an almost daily basis for past 14 years.

Secondly, you fail to consider that if atheists say there is no god, then it should stand to reason that humans cannot be gods either.

Gods do not exist and humans are not gods either.

Just like if I said "invisible pink unicorns do not exist" humans could not be invisible pink unicorns either.
Reply
#99
RE: Detecting design or intent in nature
(January 4, 2015 at 11:36 am)Rhythm Wrote: ....puff puff pass, Chief.

Humans only think they are because they do not know who they are as an outsider to their own self. They therefore must think to be, and hence, "cogito ergo sum" is real for them, until you put the fire under them and then they first learn that they are more then what they once thought to be.

This is where the ability to think is much like having red hair, and from there all of our senses are a part of the embodiment of man, including also our ability to look and see.

In the end this means that our body is the embodiment of the sum total of our parts, and if our ability to think is ours to justify our thoughts it would not take much to figure out that we are looking for the seer trying to see himself see. And if ever we find him, this stranger is what some of us would call God, while others say it is not.
Reply
RE: Detecting design or intent in nature
(January 4, 2015 at 12:10 pm)Chili Wrote:
(January 4, 2015 at 11:36 am)Rhythm Wrote: ....puff puff pass, Chief.

Humans only think they are because they do not know who they are as an outsider to their own self. They therefore must think to be, and hence, "cogito ergo sum" is real for them, until you put the fire under them and then they first learn that they are more then what they once thought to be.

This is where the ability to think is much like having red hair, and from there all of our senses are a part of the embodiment of man, including also our ability to look and see.

In the end this means that our body is the embodiment of the sum total of our parts, and if our ability to think is ours to justify our thoughts it would not take much to figure out that we are looking for the seer trying to see himself see. And if ever we find him, this stranger is what some of us would call God, while others say it is not.

Humans can be power hungry yes, but that has nothing to do atheists accepting that there is no god and humans are not gods either.

Um no, in the end our species will go extinct, our planet will die, our sun as well and the universe will continue on without any record of our existence.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Argument against Intelligent Design Jrouche 27 3363 June 2, 2019 at 5:04 pm
Last Post: GUBU
  The Nature Of Truth WisdomOfTheTrees 5 1105 February 21, 2017 at 5:30 am
Last Post: Sal
  The Dogma of Human Nature WisdomOfTheTrees 15 2667 February 8, 2017 at 7:40 pm
Last Post: WisdomOfTheTrees
  The nature of evidence Wryetui 150 15987 May 6, 2016 at 6:21 am
Last Post: ignoramus
  THE SELF-REINFORCING NATURE OF SOCIAL HIERARCHY: ORIGINS AND CONSEQUENCES OF POWER .. nihilistcat 9 3877 June 29, 2015 at 7:06 pm
Last Post: nihilistcat
  Religion had good intentions, but nature has better LivingNumbers6.626 39 9291 December 3, 2014 at 1:12 pm
Last Post: John V
  On the nature of evidence. trmof 125 27875 October 26, 2014 at 5:14 pm
Last Post: Fidel_Castronaut
  Who can answer? (law of nature) reality.Mathematician 10 3004 June 18, 2014 at 7:17 am
Last Post: ignoramus
  On the appearance of Design Angrboda 7 1832 March 16, 2014 at 4:04 am
Last Post: xr34p3rx
  Morality in Nature Jiggerj 89 24452 October 4, 2013 at 2:04 am
Last Post: genkaus



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)