Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: Evidence??
January 9, 2015 at 12:42 pm
Ah, I think I have some information to help with the foreskin problem, along with various others:
http://youtu.be/4_G9awnDCmg
Posts: 69247
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
259
RE: Evidence??
January 9, 2015 at 12:48 pm
(January 9, 2015 at 12:39 pm)Rhythm Wrote: "Everything" is making a foreskin necklace, Min...it's not like shells...where you can just find them laying around.
Well, then.....Go Blow Everything Out Your Ass!
Posts: 13901
Threads: 263
Joined: January 11, 2009
Reputation:
82
RE: Evidence??
January 9, 2015 at 1:53 pm
(January 8, 2015 at 7:19 am)W.Smith Wrote: If we look past the issue of appearance when talking about God and instead use the word “God” just as a common dominator for all things that exists. What I mean by that is if we just use the word God to describe the existence of all things seem (and unseen, and because it is short) – What kind of proof would we need, to become convinced of the existence of God? ...What kind of proof would we need to convince us that there really is something (call it God!?) that holds everything “in” existence; that holds it all together? In other words, what would we need as evidence that God is real?
No I have decided that my mighty penis is the one true god.
Behold its awesomeness bask in it's majesty.
My penis has brought forth new life on three occasions and I have proof.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
Posts: 1890
Threads: 53
Joined: December 13, 2014
Reputation:
35
RE: Evidence??
January 9, 2015 at 2:19 pm
(January 9, 2015 at 1:53 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote: (January 8, 2015 at 7:19 am)W.Smith Wrote: If we look past the issue of appearance when talking about God and instead use the word “God” just as a common dominator for all things that exists. What I mean by that is if we just use the word God to describe the existence of all things seem (and unseen, and because it is short) – What kind of proof would we need, to become convinced of the existence of God? ...What kind of proof would we need to convince us that there really is something (call it God!?) that holds everything “in” existence; that holds it all together? In other words, what would we need as evidence that God is real?
No I have decided that my mighty penis is the one true god.
Behold its awesomeness bask in it's majesty.
My penis has brought forth new life on three occasions and I have proof.
Two more times than mine. 
Well I'm convinced.
I reject your reality and substitute my own!
Posts: 8270
Threads: 40
Joined: March 18, 2014
Reputation:
54
RE: Evidence??
January 9, 2015 at 3:04 pm
(January 8, 2015 at 7:19 am)W.Smith Wrote: If we look past the issue of appearance when talking about God and instead use the word “God” just as a common dominator for all things that exists. What I mean by that is if we just use the word God to describe the existence of all things seem (and unseen, and because it is short) – What kind of proof would we need, to become convinced of the existence of God? ...What kind of proof would we need to convince us that there really is something (call it God!?) that holds everything “in” existence; that holds it all together? In other words, what would we need as evidence that God is real?
Before we can even begin to discuss what forms of evidence would be acceptable to prove (or falsify) the existence of god(s), we first need a coherent definition of what a god is.
In my experience, the more clearly defined a god is, the easier it is to falsify and the more vague the definition gets, the less it matters if that god exists or not.
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
Posts: 13901
Threads: 263
Joined: January 11, 2009
Reputation:
82
RE: Evidence??
January 9, 2015 at 4:01 pm
(January 9, 2015 at 3:04 pm)GalacticBusDriver Wrote: (January 8, 2015 at 7:19 am)W.Smith Wrote: If we look past the issue of appearance when talking about God and instead use the word “God” just as a common dominator for all things that exists. What I mean by that is if we just use the word God to describe the existence of all things seem (and unseen, and because it is short) – What kind of proof would we need, to become convinced of the existence of God? ...What kind of proof would we need to convince us that there really is something (call it God!?) that holds everything “in” existence; that holds it all together? In other words, what would we need as evidence that God is real?
Before we can even begin to discuss what forms of evidence would be acceptable to prove (or falsify) the existence of god(s), we first need a coherent definition of what a god is.
In my experience, the more clearly defined a god is, the easier it is to falsify and the more vague the definition gets, the less it matters if that god exists or not.
God is right here. (Points to crotch and wiggles).
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
Posts: 8731
Threads: 425
Joined: October 7, 2014
Reputation:
37
RE: Evidence??
January 9, 2015 at 4:41 pm
(January 9, 2015 at 4:01 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote: (January 9, 2015 at 3:04 pm)GalacticBusDriver Wrote: Before we can even begin to discuss what forms of evidence would be acceptable to prove (or falsify) the existence of god(s), we first need a coherent definition of what a god is.
In my experience, the more clearly defined a god is, the easier it is to falsify and the more vague the definition gets, the less it matters if that god exists or not.
God is right here. (Points to crotch and wiggles).
And there. (points at oven)
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today.
Code: <iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=true"></iframe>
Posts: 5466
Threads: 36
Joined: November 10, 2014
Reputation:
53
RE: Evidence??
January 9, 2015 at 6:30 pm
There is only one true god. Worship, or be eaten!
"I was thirsty for everything, but blood wasn't my style" - Live, "Voodoo Lady"
Posts: 2009
Threads: 2
Joined: October 8, 2012
Reputation:
26
RE: Evidence??
January 9, 2015 at 7:20 pm
(January 9, 2015 at 4:41 pm)dyresand Wrote: (January 9, 2015 at 4:01 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote: God is right here. (Points to crotch and wiggles).
And there. (points at oven) And over there (waves vaguely in some indeterminate direction)
Posts: 23918
Threads: 300
Joined: June 25, 2011
Reputation:
151
RE: Evidence??
January 9, 2015 at 7:40 pm
(This post was last modified: January 9, 2015 at 7:44 pm by Whateverist.)
(January 8, 2015 at 7:19 am)W.Smith Wrote: If we look past the issue of appearance when talking about God and instead use the word “God” just as a common dominator for all things that exists. What I mean by that is if we just use the word God to describe the existence of all things seem (and unseen, and because it is short) – What kind of proof would we need, to become convinced of the existence of God? ...What kind of proof would we need to convince us that there really is something (call it God!?) that holds everything “in” existence; that holds it all together? In other words, what would we need as evidence that God is real?
Why do you seek something to "hold it all in existence"? We can see or in some other way detect that which exists. We have no reason to think there is something else which holds it together, do we?
Perhaps you have in mind the strong nuclear force found within an atom? Must we also imagine something holding that force together, along with yet something else to then hold it together? Maybe existence isn't really a set of infinite Russian dolls, one within the other. Perhaps what we see is what we get.
Until you have a cogent reason to think otherwise, I'll leave you to ponder this non-problem on your own.
(January 8, 2015 at 8:10 am)W.Smith Wrote: (January 8, 2015 at 7:47 am)Brakeman Wrote: Is this a question of trying to use the existence of a vague wispy philosophical term of a god to support the want of existence for precisely described purported gods that every christian, muslim, and hindu swears to have a personal relationship with?
This is not about words, it is about pinpointing what kind of evidence we are looking for when we claim that there is not evidence of a God (or whatever you choose to call it) 
It certainly isn't my job to describe to you the sort of evidence you are looking for. Hell, I don't really know what you mean by god anyway. All I'm saying is I haven't seen any evidence for whatever it is you have in mind. Why not just give us a description and show us what you have by way of evidence .. or I'll just go back to ignoring whatever it is.
|
