Blasphemy

[Metis]

We have a great respect for women, unlike atheist who sale them into the sex trade and use them like something less than animals.

GC

And...What exactly is insisting they submit to men as their personal baby factories again? The cake mixtures gotta get put in the oven somehow.

I would be more specific in my points but Southern Baptist and your profile makes your beliefs regarding sex hard to pin down. There's never been a shortage of brothels in good Christian societies though, if anything they're less common in western Europe since the stigma around getting in the sack with whoever you want whenever you like was removed. Why pay when you can get it free? It's your lot that keep the hookers in business!

[Godscreated]

So you believe we should live by the OT laws? Really, can't you understand they are given to a people of God's choosing, it's plainly written the OT law isn't meant for the Christian people, only those who wish to save themselves by perfectly keeping these laws, give it a try, ooops, you slipped, time for Jesus.

GC

Indeed. God made an arbitrary list of things he doesn't like and will send you to hell if you do them. Unless you agree to believe in a certain aspect of him, in which case he'll give you a pass and not send you to he'll for eating shrimp.

Only those who use the law as salvation will go to hell for eating shrimp, if you had even read the NT you would have known the food laws are not a requirement for Christians, seriously you should study the Bible if you are going to argue against it or Christianity.

GC

[Fidel_Castronaut]

Not often enough, are your women's heads covered to preserve their modesty and do you beat them for speaking before men?

Do your women read the bible? That's actually a sin you know, Paul makes it really rather clear women are to ask their superior male...I-I mean husband...in private what things mean.

No Godschild, you do not use the NT. You cherrypick the bits you like and shove the rest under the bed.

We have a great respect for women, unlike atheist who sale them into the sex trade and use them like something less than animals.

GC

Brilliant.

Think GC has finally gone off the deep end.

Laters all, off to sell the women I own to the local slave traders.

[vorlon13]

To be clear, I am AMAZED at the numbers of self proclaimed believers that presuppose they know better than God and utilize their own extra-biblical prejudices to reinterpret (or ignore) plainly written strictures, edicts, promulgations, rules, commandments and laws transmitted literally and inerrantly via Holy Scripture.

That's the blasphemy I find inexplicable and fucking annoying.

So you believe we should live by the OT laws? Really, can't you understand they are given to a people of God's choosing, it's plainly written the OT law isn't meant for the Christian people, only those who wish to save themselves by perfectly keeping these laws, give it a try, ooops, you slipped, time for Jesus.

GC

The 10 Commandments are not only OT, but when Christ was asked which to follow, scripture records his answer was around 1/2 of them. Still, we see 'self proclaimed Christers' wanting all 10 in the public square.

I find the befuddlement, just on this one issue (and there be many more), telling in precisely the way I noted in my quoted post.

Seeing another apostate posting in regards to yet MORE scripture cherry picking is disappointing.

Can't we get some non-blaspheming, non-apostatic, non-heretical Christians here ever ??????????

[Jacob(smooth)]

You're full of this kind of statements yet you haven't given a speck of proof, so where is it?

GC

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_Jesus

Pick literally any one of the academic texts referenced on this wikipage.

This wiki page?

There is no physical or archeological evidence for Jesus, and all the sources we have are documentary. The sources for the historical Jesus are mainly Christian writings, such as the gospels and the purported letters of the apostles. The authenticity and reliability of these sources has been questioned by many scholars, and few events mentioned in the gospels are universally accepted

---

Indeed. God made an arbitrary list of things he doesn't like and will send you to hell if you do them. Unless you agree to believe in a certain aspect of him, in which case he'll give you a pass and not send you to he'll for eating shrimp.

Only those who use the law as salvation will go to hell for eating shrimp, if you had even read the NT you would have known the food laws are not a requirement for Christians, seriously you should study the Bible if you are going to argue against it or Christianity.

GC

That's why I said "unless you believe in a part of him (jesus) in which case he'll give you a pass. "

Seriously you should read my posts if you're going to argue against them.

[Godscreated]

Seriously? You think it's incumbent on people to provide proof that God DIDN'T write the Bible?!

If they want to argue against it, yes, it's only proper to defend a stance.

GC

[Crossless2.0]

I have putz, and I know the truth about the people and the God who used man to write the Bible, so what's your excuse for being intellectually challenged when it comes to the Bible.

GC

I'm not intellectually challenged when it comes to the Bible: I recognize it as the collection of primitive just-so stories, priestly justifications for power and control, and superstitious drivel that it is. I also understand why spiritually stunted and intellectually challenged dwarves like yourself are drawn to it.

Now get thee to a library!

[Jacob(smooth)]

Seriously? You think it's incumbent on people to provide proof that God DIDN'T write the Bible?!

If they want to argue against it, yes, it's only proper to defend a stance.

GC

So if I told you that I was God, it would be incumbent on you to prove I wasn't, not me to prove I was? It would be proper to expect you to provide evidence that I am NOT God?

By all means, come ahead! Prove I'm not God.

[Fidel_Castronaut]

[Godscreated]

We have a great respect for women, unlike atheist who sale them into the sex trade and use them like something less than animals.

GC

And...What exactly is insisting they submit to men as their personal baby factories again? The cake mixtures gotta get put in the oven somehow.

I would be more specific in my points but Southern Baptist and your profile makes your beliefs regarding sex hard to pin down. There's never been a shortage of brothels in good Christian societies though, if anything they're less common in western Europe since the stigma around getting in the sack with whoever you want whenever you like was removed. Why pay when you can get it free? It's your lot that keep the hookers in business!

You need to supply the proof about that being so. Europe as a whole is a bed of the sex slave trade and atheist head up this slave trade and they go to the lowest point (position) in it. You can deflect from the truth all you want, but it is your kind that use children and women in a way that should bring condemnation on you, but your kind enjoy it instead of doing anything to get rid of it. The Christian church leads out in ridding the world of your terrible crime.

GC