Whatever Shall The God Freaks Say Now?

[TubbyTubby]

GC, Drich and prof will all have different ways to refute evidence. These type of finds have already gone through the delusion filter.

1 You can't prove it's a human bone.
2 The dating method is flawed.
3 blah blah blah

[Thumpalumpacus]

When challenged regarding the species of the bone, Christians will simply concoct a translation argument where the word 'ass' is confused.

Let's face it -- most men are asses, at least according to our gals.

[robvalue]

Ah, nice. Very interesting.

It makes me really sad to think about every christian now having to randomly make up stories about this to convince themself that reality is still wrong.

[Norman Humann]

Uhh... let's see... It's a metaphor... lawd works in mysterious ways... ah, here it is: but the bible doesn't deny it! duh

[Fidel_Castronaut]

I'm going to go with dating methods being flawed.

[robvalue]

I think I'll place my bets on "looking at a picture of it and disagreeing with the analysis based on nothing".

[professor]

Well Tubby, 2 out of 3 isn't too bad.
I don't know about the blah blah part.

You guys gleefully swallow every so called "New find/ link" that comes around,
then decades later, each one gets debunked (a pleasant way of saying the thing was a lie) quietly.

[FatAndFaithless]

Got some examples, prof?

[Norman Humann]

Damn it! I keep losing those bets.

[Esquilax]

Got some examples, prof?

And I'll warn you ahead of time that for every Piltdown Man style example you give, I'll post a link to what the actual scientific community thought of that fossil, not the straw-scientific community you think there is via the drip feed of creationist bullshit you so eagerly devour.