Posts: 4738
Threads: 7
Joined: October 17, 2013
Reputation:
15
RE: Disproving The Resurrection By The Maximal Facts Approach
June 29, 2015 at 7:58 pm
(This post was last modified: June 29, 2015 at 8:10 pm by Huggy Bear.)
(June 29, 2015 at 1:25 pm)Neimenovic Wrote: *you're, like in 'you're a fucking idiot'.
Are you claiming that Jesus was whipped, beaten and nailed to a cross without even one wound becoming infected in the times when demons substituted the germ theory?
Are you really that fucking dumb?
No, you intellectually dishonest cretin. The wound does not take longer than six hours to be infected. An infection can happen virtually instantly, like Kev noted, and it would be fucking miraculous if after all that flogging, beating and hammering with obviously unsterilized nails the wound DIDN'T become infected. *emphasis mine*
Ironic that you used the term miraculous.
His whole life was miraculous you muppet.  We're speaking of Jesus here, you know... God in human form, virgin birth, walking on water, people being healed of disease just by touching him, and you speculate that he may have suffered from infection....
Do yourself a favor, sit down and shut up.
Posts: 6946
Threads: 26
Joined: April 28, 2012
Reputation:
83
RE: Disproving The Resurrection By The Maximal Facts Approach
June 30, 2015 at 12:01 am
(June 27, 2015 at 7:27 pm)popsthebuilder Wrote: Our life choices in this material world will decide the rest of our existence, and since you can't destroy energy our existence may be a really long time.
Stop eating and let me know what happens. Look, if you're going to use basic scientific facts in an argument you should endeavor to understand them. In this case you should go research the first law of thermodynamics and pay close attention to what is meant by the word system.
Posts: 6946
Threads: 26
Joined: April 28, 2012
Reputation:
83
RE: Disproving The Resurrection By The Maximal Facts Approach
June 30, 2015 at 12:05 am
(June 29, 2015 at 7:58 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: His whole life was miraculous you muppet. We're speaking of Jesus here, you know... God in human form, virgin birth, walking on water, people being healed of disease just by touching him, and you speculate that he may have suffered from infection....
Do yourself a favor, sit down and shut up.
Some godboy you've got there. Impervious to infection, but has a huge fucking problem with pointy objects.
Posts: 8731
Threads: 425
Joined: October 7, 2014
Reputation:
37
RE: Disproving The Resurrection By The Maximal Facts Approach
June 30, 2015 at 12:09 am
(June 29, 2015 at 7:58 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: (June 29, 2015 at 1:25 pm)Neimenovic Wrote: *you're, like in 'you're a fucking idiot'.
Are you claiming that Jesus was whipped, beaten and nailed to a cross without even one wound becoming infected in the times when demons substituted the germ theory?
Are you really that fucking dumb?
No, you intellectually dishonest cretin. The wound does not take longer than six hours to be infected. An infection can happen virtually instantly, like Kev noted, and it would be fucking miraculous if after all that flogging, beating and hammering with obviously unsterilized nails the wound DIDN'T become infected. *emphasis mine*
Ironic that you used the term miraculous.
His whole life was miraculous you muppet. We're speaking of Jesus here, you know... God in human form, virgin birth, walking on water, people being healed of disease just by touching him, and you speculate that he may have suffered from infection....
Do yourself a favor, sit down and shut up. Says the guy who believe's in a magic zombe jew that was born from a whore in the middle east, oh and to make things worse she was a "virgin"  (Ladies gents i don't like using that word whore so please take no offense). And also believes that adam and eve were tempted by a talking lizard snake. And even a bigger smack to the face that god created human beings.
1. There is no evidence of a person named jesus dying and coming back to life
2. The bible is a rip off of other religions of the time
3. You are a disingenuous mother fucker
4. The bible is fucking hearsay it is not a accurate representation of history what so ever....
5. Historical or biblical jesus never existed to begin with.
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today.
Code: <iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=true"></iframe>
Posts: 4738
Threads: 7
Joined: October 17, 2013
Reputation:
15
RE: Disproving The Resurrection By The Maximal Facts Approach
June 30, 2015 at 12:14 am
(June 30, 2015 at 12:05 am)Cato Wrote: Some godboy you've got there. Impervious to infection, but has a huge fucking problem with pointy objects.
Therefore doth my Father love me, because I lay down my life, that I might take it again. No man taketh it from me, but I lay it down of myself. I have power to lay it down, and I have power to take it again. This commandment have I received of my Father. - Jesus Christ John 10:17-18
Posts: 69247
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
258
RE: Disproving The Resurrection By The Maximal Facts Approach
June 30, 2015 at 1:10 am
Quote:We're speaking of Jesus here, you know...
Ha. You're speaking of fucking jesus. We're speaking to a delusional moron.
Grow up. Fairy tales are not real.
Posts: 7318
Threads: 75
Joined: April 18, 2015
Reputation:
72
RE: Disproving The Resurrection By The Maximal Facts Approach
June 30, 2015 at 3:20 am
(June 29, 2015 at 7:58 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: *emphasis mine*
Ironic that you used the term miraculous.
His whole life was miraculous you muppet. We're speaking of Jesus here, you know... God in human form, virgin birth, walking on water, people being healed of disease just by touching him, and you speculate that he may have suffered from infection....
Do yourself a favor, sit down and shut up.
No, we're talking about bacteria, septic wounds and hypotheses. Godboy magic isn't a fact. Unless you have solid evidence to back up the claims you've made, it's you who should shut up.
But anyway, looks like this discussion is over. You wanted a source to prove bacteria speed up the process of decay, I gave you one. You argued that a wound needs longer than six hours to become infected and I pointed out how idiotic that is. Now you're down to asserting fairy tales as facts, so I take it you give up. But you know, it's really not that hard to say 'I was wrong'. Try it some time.
Posts: 7318
Threads: 75
Joined: April 18, 2015
Reputation:
72
RE: Disproving The Resurrection By The Maximal Facts Approach
June 30, 2015 at 3:26 am
(June 30, 2015 at 12:14 am)Huggy74 Wrote: Therefore doth my Father love me, because I lay down my life, that I might take it again. No man taketh it from me, but I lay it down of myself. I have power to lay it down, and I have power to take it again. This commandment have I received of my Father. - Jesus Christ John 10:17-18
[A] quotation is a handy thing to have about, saving one the trouble of thinking for oneself, always a laborious business. - A. A. Milne, 'If I May'
Posts: 13122
Threads: 130
Joined: October 18, 2014
Reputation:
55
RE: Disproving The Resurrection By The Maximal Facts Approach
June 30, 2015 at 4:04 am
(June 30, 2015 at 12:14 am)Huggy74 Wrote: Therefore doth my Father love me, because I lay down my life, that I might take it again. No man taketh it from me, but I lay it down of myself. I have power to lay it down, and I have power to take it again. This commandment have I received of my Father. - Jesus Christ John 10:17-18
And what's that supposed to prove, other than the usual problem with the trinity concept. You know, either there are three or there's a three in one package. Can't have it both ways. The former means, out goes monotheism, the latter means, out goes any kind of meaningful sacrifice, since Jesus is god, the same god posing as father and holy spirit.
Posts: 4738
Threads: 7
Joined: October 17, 2013
Reputation:
15
RE: Disproving The Resurrection By The Maximal Facts Approach
June 30, 2015 at 4:29 am
(This post was last modified: June 30, 2015 at 4:31 am by Huggy Bear.)
(June 30, 2015 at 4:04 am)abaris Wrote: (June 30, 2015 at 12:14 am)Huggy74 Wrote: Therefore doth my Father love me, because I lay down my life, that I might take it again. No man taketh it from me, but I lay it down of myself. I have power to lay it down, and I have power to take it again. This commandment have I received of my Father. - Jesus Christ John 10:17-18
And what's that supposed to prove, other than the usual problem with the trinity concept. You know, either there are three or there's a three in one package. Can't have it both ways. The former means, out goes monotheism, the latter means, out goes any kind of meaningful sacrifice, since Jesus is god, the same god posing as father and holy spirit.
What are you talking about? If you want to get spiritual, then you yourself are made complete from a trinity. Body, soul and spirit. does this make you three different people? Does it require three different people to be a husband, father, and son? Or can one person be all three?
Think about it.
|
![[Image: Bumper+Sticker+-+Asheville+-+Praise+Dog3.JPG]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=1.bp.blogspot.com%2F-d-3rfdI7nG0%2FTerwtFyFXoI%2FAAAAAAAACak%2F7kFSmHeVrng%2Fs320%2FBumper%2BSticker%2B-%2BAsheville%2B-%2BPraise%2BDog3.JPG)
