Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)

[Red_Wind]

Said atheist dogmas would probably have been demolished by other atheists long before you got to them on this forum.Have yet to see you do any demolishing though, perhaps you can link to other forums where you "demolished" said dogmas to back up your claim?

You like to be funny Wind, do you?  
Before i start with few atheists dogmas i start with one of yours.
You say..........We live a life trying to achieve happiness only to die........
By saying this you claim that we die.
Where is the evidence that we die?
Have you got solid evidence that the body is the real you and that the consciousness and the body are one?
I tell you what Wind.
Until you back your claim with solid evidence you should really shut up because a statement not backed up by solid evidence is a dogma.
You see Wind how easy is to demolish a dogma!  
If, on the other hand you would have said...........I think that we may die....then that is not a dogma because you do not state that that is true.
Now let us see few of atheists dogmas.
1) The consciousness is a product of the brain.
2) The consciousness that we got come thanks to previous generations.
3) We only got the physical senses.
4) The universe started with the big bang.

Happy now?  

Not as funny as you, i don't think we could have asked for a more disillusioned member on the forum.(or a better source of entertainment)

Firstly, can you define "solid evidence" since nothing can really be proofed 100%

The examples you posted aren't dogmas, they are theories or hypothesis's (i haven't delved into those topics yet).Since they they have been formed using scientific method and science can never proof everything 100%, it fails the first criteria of a dogma which is : a principle or set of principles laid down by an authority as incontrovertibly true.

[SofaKingHigh]

Uh huh, NDE's anybody?
Your huge knowledge of the etymology of English...the list doesn't end there.
The only thing you've demolished is your own credibility little prik.

With an atheist referee no wonder nothing get demolish.
If you still haven't got the message i will try to refresh your dormant memory.
I mean if here would be an independent referee.
Capisci?      

Once again, answering nothing and ignoring any argument thrown your way.

You're like that kid at school, the one who always sat next to the driver on the school bus with his tongue firmly attached to the window.  There's never any point in trying to strike up conversation, you'd just end up getting covered in snot.

[Homeless Nutter]

[...]You're like that kid at school, the one who always sat next to the driver on the school bus with his tongue firmly attached to the window. [...]

Rik had no choice, but to sit next to the driver - it was a very, very short bus...

[Little Rik]

You like to be funny Wind, do you?  
Before i start with few atheists dogmas i start with one of yours.
You say..........We live a life trying to achieve happiness only to die........
By saying this you claim that we die.
Where is the evidence that we die?
Have you got solid evidence that the body is the real you and that the consciousness and the body are one?
I tell you what Wind.
Until you back your claim with solid evidence you should really shut up because a statement not backed up by solid evidence is a dogma.
You see Wind how easy is to demolish a dogma!  
If, on the other hand you would have said...........I think that we may die....then that is not a dogma because you do not state that that is true.
Now let us see few of atheists dogmas.
1) The consciousness is a product of the brain.
2) The consciousness that we got come thanks to previous generations.
3) We only got the physical senses.
4) The universe started with the big bang.

Happy now?  

Not as funny as you, i don't think we could have asked for a more disillusioned member on the forum.(or a better source of entertainment)

Blahhh, blahhhh, and more blahhhhhhhhhhhh.....

Firstly, can you define "solid evidence" since nothing can really be proofed 100%

I am (we all are) and this is solid evidence that we are WE and all the rest is not evidence.
This alone can be proofed 100%.

The examples you posted aren't dogmas, they are theories or hypothesis's (i haven't delved into those topics yet).Since they they have been formed using scientific method and science can never proof everything 100%,

Get real Wind.
Those are statements without an inch of evidence and therefore are dogmas.
Atheists do not say.......I THINK THAT THE CONSCIOUSNESS IS A PRODUCT OF THE BRAIN.
They say..........THE CONSCIOUSNESS IS.......BLAH BLAH BLAH.
Are you so dumb that can't see the difference?  

it fails the first criteria of a dogma which is : a principle or set of principles laid down by an authority as incontrovertibly true.

There is no need for authority.
As far as you confine a statement inside a corral and you prevent anyone to challenge
that statement you automatically create a dogma.  

[Little Rik]

With an atheist referee no wonder nothing get demolish.
If you still haven't got the message i will try to refresh your dormant memory.
I mean if here would be an independent referee.
Capisci?      

Once again, answering nothing and ignoring any argument thrown your way.
You're like that kid at school, the one who always sat next to the driver on the school bus with his tongue firmly attached to the window.  There's never any point in trying to strike up conversation, you'd just end up getting covered in snot.

You don't seem to pay attention to what is written.
Look here Sofa.

SofaKingHigh Wrote:
Uh huh, NDE's anybody?
Your huge knowledge of the etymology of English...the list doesn't end there.
The only thing you've demolished is your own credibility little prik.

And then you write that ...............Once again, answering nothing and ignoring any argument thrown your way...........

Now you tell me what there is to answer in such a comment full o'crap?  

[God of Mr. Hanky]

Somebody's shooting at the record for the longest and most pointless thread in cyber-history, so what the f***!

[Iroscato]

Somebody's shooting at the record for the longest and most pointless thread in cyber-history, so what the f***!

He's got a way to go to beat this bag of reheated shit (linking this and trusting nobody will necro it, please don't be That Guy)

http://atheistforums.org/thread-21336-po...pid1043009

That's probably not even the longest one on here tbh, certainly not the longest on the internet

[SofaKingHigh]

Once again, answering nothing and ignoring any argument thrown your way.
You're like that kid at school, the one who always sat next to the driver on the school bus with his tongue firmly attached to the window.  There's never any point in trying to strike up conversation, you'd just end up getting covered in snot.

You don't seem to pay attention to what is written.
Look here Sofa.

SofaKingHigh Wrote:
Uh huh, NDE's anybody?
Your huge knowledge of the etymology of English...the list doesn't end there.
The only thing you've demolished is your own credibility little prik.

And then you write that ...............Once again, answering nothing and ignoring any argument thrown your way...........

Now you tell me what there is to answer in such a comment full o'crap?  

Deflection again, you asserted that you had "demolished" all atheist arguments.  You see this thing called "context" comes into it when quoting, so when you see me replying "NDE's?"  (Important to note that question mark there)   It is obvious that I was questioning that assertion.

So, you window licking fiend, why does the worlds largest study into NDE's, one of your strongest arguments in this thread, not find a single shred of evidence for the claims you make?

[SofaKingHigh]

[...]You're like that kid at school, the one who always sat next to the driver on the school bus with his tongue firmly attached to the window. [...]

Rik had no choice, but to sit next to the driver - it was a very, very short bus...

The driver had to take drastic action after little prik's first day at school:

[Cyberman]

With an atheist referee no wonder nothing get demolish.
If you still haven't got the message i will try to refresh your dormant memory.
I mean if here would be an independent referee.
Capisci?      

And here we go again with the insinuations of bias. Haven't you got the message yet, there are no referees here. There's Staff, whose job it is to moderate the forum and keep it running smoothly, but nobody is refereeing your posts except you. Maybe you should take it up with that guy if you have a problem with the way he does things? I understand he's all ears.