New study shows 132.8% of men are pedophiles?

[Rev. Rye]

[Nope]

Only 19.6% of the straight male population prefer post-pubescent traits in females i.e. hair in arm pits, hair on pubic area, hair on legs, large facial pores, proportionately smaller eyes.

Shaving has been popular for women for a long time in the United States. A woman without armpit or pubic hair doesn't look like a prepubescent female. There are other indications of a woman's age besides hair.


If a woman likes a clean shaven man does she also have pedophilic tendencies?

[TheRealJoeFish]

Anything other blatant I may have missed?

Possibly, but that's just because they've got so many, not because you didn't do a good job.

I read FSTDT all the time.  In fact, it's how I found Atheist Forums.

[KUSA]

I'm surprised there is no poll here.

[Whateverist]

Are they double counting some men or perhaps throwing the few pedophile ladies in with the guys? Otherwise 132% strikes me as implausibly high.

[Rev. Rye]

I'm surprised there is no poll here.

What is there to poll about here? I'm sure most posters here, even the most hardcore separated from reality Fundamentalists, are likely to share very similar negative views about this site.

[TheRealJoeFish]

Are they double counting some men or perhaps throwing the few pedophile ladies in with the guys?  Otherwise 132% strikes me as implausibly high.

What I think they meant was that 91.4% of men who took their survey were non-exclusive or exclusive pedophiles and 41.4% were exclusive pedophiles.

They're missing an "at least," as in "91.4% of men showed at least a non-exclusive attraction to children, and 41.4% showed an exclusive attraction."

Even if that's what they meant to say, that claim's still absurd for reasons that Rev. Rye pointed out (equivocation of "pre-pubescent traits" with attraction to pre-pubescent people, bias in the polling population, etc).  If I recall correctly, the more scientific studies have found that something like 5% to 15% of men have some attraction to pre-pubescent children.  I'll try to get a few cites on that.

Edit:

Not a scientific cite, but a brief description of some studies (RationalWiki.org):

"In a sample of nearly 200 university males, 21% reported some sexual attraction to small children, 9% described sexual fantasies involving children, 5% admitted to having masturbated to sexual fantasies of children, and 7% indicated they might have sex with a child if not caught. In another sample with 100 male and 180 female undergraduate students, 22% of males and 3% of females reported sexual attraction to a child.

In a sample of 80 volunteers, about 25% self-reported some pedophilic interest or in the plethysmographic phase exhibited penile arousal to a child that equaled or exceeded arousal to an adult. In a control group of 66 males recruited from hospital staff and the community, 17% showed a penile response that was pedophilic.

An estimate of 1 percent of the male population has pedophilic disorder, and it is assumed that a much smaller proportion of the female population has it."

[Longhorn]

I don't even care about the math man.


'Imitading'.


I'll go cry now.

[Rev. Rye]

I don't even care about the math man.


'Imitading'.


I'll go cry now.

Yes, for the record, I did copy/paste it directly from the site itself. It's not a fault in transcription by me or FSTDT. The spelling errors are in the original.

[CapnAwesome]

Yeah, that's obvious crap. About the worst 'study' I've seen in quite a while.