(September 1, 2015 at 11:03 am)pocaracas Wrote:(September 1, 2015 at 10:59 am)Iroscato Wrote: Who is Bill and why have you mailed him that is a cruel thing to do.
It's a bill, not a Bill. Can't you read?!
Like a duck bill? You sicken me.
|
HELL
|
(September 1, 2015 at 11:03 am)pocaracas Wrote:(September 1, 2015 at 10:59 am)Iroscato Wrote: Who is Bill and why have you mailed him that is a cruel thing to do. Like a duck bill? You sicken me. (September 1, 2015 at 11:07 am)Clueless Morgan Wrote:(August 31, 2015 at 8:35 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: That second one is the big question. There is a theory I've heard, and that is that God keeps Himself hidden from us in this life because otherwise many people would blame Him for anything that went wrong, and always ask Him for things. I understand people already pray and ask Him for things, and blame Him for things, but imagine if He was in the form of a person standing right in front of us, and we were able to converse with Him everyday, like a parent or a very close friend. Imagine having a close friend who is all powerful. Most of us would probably not be able to help but feel resentment towards Him when a loved one died, or when we asked for something that didn't happen. I mean, that happens even without Him being like a person we can see and talk to. Imagine if we could?
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh (September 1, 2015 at 12:09 am)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Judging from some of the questions/comments, I can see that some of you simply did not understand the original post lol. I'm sorry, but I just don't know how to make it any more clear. I thought the article explained the concept pretty well. Some of you are still acting as though it's a "punishment" cast by God, that no one deserves. It's not. It's a state of being that a person puts themselves in, and in doing so, they make themselves pretty miserable. In your opinion: Some other catholics....opinions. Quote:'Oh, what strength has not the fear of Hell to rein us in from sin! Quote:'The natural fire that we see during this life has great power to burn and torment. Yet this is not even a shadow of the fire of Hell. There are two reasons why the fire of Hell is more dreadful beyond all comparison than the fire of this life. Quote:'That fire is more deadly than any which man can suffer in this life.' Quote:'I saw the torments of hell and those of purgatory; no words can describe them. Had poor mortals the faintest idea of them, they would suffer a thousand deaths rather than undergo the least of their torments during a single day.' Quote:'All souls are immortal, even those of the wicked. Yet, it would be better for them if they were not deathless. For they are punished with the endless vengeance of quenchless fire. Since they do not die, it is impossible for them to have an end put to their misery.'Let me know when you get it all worked out with these "saints." RE: HELL
September 1, 2015 at 11:16 am
(This post was last modified: September 1, 2015 at 11:23 am by Homeless Nutter.)
"The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one." - George Bernard Shaw
(September 1, 2015 at 11:07 am)Clueless Morgan Wrote:Quote:I'm just trying to imagine... if God was someone we could see and talk with every day, and we developed a personal relationship with Him in that way like we would with a friend, considering who He is (all powerful and all that), we'd probably demand a lot from Him. Perhaps you are right, if we equate Him merely to a human who just happens to have more money. But I think it'd be a little more than that. Like I said in my previous post though, many people already feel resentment towards God when things don't go right.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
@CL: Since even Catholics can't agree on the most basic properties of hell, what makes you confident that (a) it is real at all and (b) your idea is the correct one?
Hell was an invention of the church, a means of control. Nothing more, and nothing less. The idea of an afterlife being about reward and punishment is a human concept. If God exists and expects us to live our lives a certain way, he'd have written it into our code instead of having men write it on pages.
(September 1, 2015 at 11:07 am)Clueless Morgan Wrote:Quote:We'd probably get down right pissed off at Him every time something very unfortunate happened in our lives. He'd be the scapegoat, and he'd be hated. We'd hate Him. Hating God is not good for our own well being, so it is for our own sake that He does not present Himself openly in our everyday lives. Sounds like you have a bit more faith in humanity than I do lol. Perhaps you are right. I don't see it though. I think a lot of people can be stubborn and irrational, especially when dealing with something very difficult like the death of a loved one. They can just not accept or agree with God's explanation for why something bad happened, or why they didn't get that job they asked Him for... they can tell themselves that God is evil and that if He really loved them things would be different, the world would be better, etc. But then again, this is merely a theory that makes sense to me and that I have come to agree with. I'm not going to declare it as something I have 100% confidence in. I could be wrong.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh (September 1, 2015 at 11:10 am)Iroscato Wrote:(September 1, 2015 at 11:03 am)pocaracas Wrote: It's a bill, not a Bill. Can't you read?! Lol, was it you that made a comment about poop earlier on in the thread, or was it Kevin? I can't find it now, but I wanted to let yall know everything is fine in that department. I already got it out of my system today, so I'm good to go. Hope it's working out in yalls favor too.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|