The Atheist Obsession with Insulting Christians

[abaris]

Nobody really listens to that guy Jesus. It should be called 'Paulianity'.

Very true. But somehow many tend to ignore that.

[The Grand Nudger]

Nobody really listens to that guy Jesus. It should be called 'Paulianity'.

How about Pollyanna-ty?

[TheRocketSurgeon]

Seriously Rocky (do you care if we call you that?), you've only been here two weeks but man I enjoy your posts.  Again, hit the nail on the head.  It's not the subject that is being presented that is causing the attack, but how it is presented that causes the issue.

Thanks! But I do prefer "Rocket". I know a dog named Rocky.

[Kingpin]

Seriously Rocky (do you care if we call you that?), you've only been here two weeks but man I enjoy your posts.  Again, hit the nail on the head.  It's not the subject that is being presented that is causing the attack, but how it is presented that causes the issue.

Thanks! But I do prefer "Rocket". I know a dog named Rocky.

Rocket it is!  

[Longhorn]

I'm fairly sure some chap called Jesus used to waffle on about turning the other cheek to those who strike you...

Oh?

Stay out of my damn lane, 'Jesus'... >:c

[Iroscato]

I'm fairly sure some chap called Jesus used to waffle on about turning the other cheek to those who strike you...

Oh?

Stay out of my damn lane, 'Jesus'... >:c

The moment I typed that, I knew it was coming XD

[Thumpalumpacus]

Randy ignores the fact that atheists here speak out against fellow atheists when they spew bigotry or cheer violence against religionists. Kitan, for instance earnt the pillow-party he got when he lamented that the body count in S. Carolina wasn't high enough. Randy has ignored the defense of CL and King here in this thread.

He is blinkered, wedded to his image of atheists, probably in order to avoid reexamining his own preconceived notions.

Rubbish. The only image I have of Parkers Tan is the one he has chosen to present. The same is true for everyone else.

Then you've ignored what is probably a majority of the posts I've made here.

And that ain't my problem.

[Thumpalumpacus]

No one's handcuffed you to the doorknob, Cupcake.

Of course not. But if I were a cupcake, I wouldn't have joined to begin with.

Conversely, do you have the stones to take your pathetic arguments AGAINST theism to CAF?

Who's the cupcake now?

I don't feel the need to push my atheism onto believers.

Do you see now how your image of at least one atheist is skewed? If I behaved as you do, you'd call me an "angry atheist". But since I don't conform to the stereotype in your head, you think I cannot stand up for my lack of belief. You don't understand that others don't don't share your obnoxious urge to proselytize.

If you don't like objections to your preaching, there are several options available to you. Yet you avail yourself of none of them, instead preferring to whine when you aren't greeted with open arms.

If you're going to dish it out, don't whine when it gets handed back to you.

[Thumpalumpacus]

I come here to discuss religion and other topics, not be preached at or slurred, and while I respect your live-and-let-live outlook, when someone gives me what-for I make my feelings plain ... no matter their faith or lack thereof.

But there's not really that much discussion going on, is there?

If atheists and theists were actually politely discussing IDEAS, this thead would not have gained such traction.

The courtesy happens in your absence ... and there's a reason for that. We'll see if you have enough self-awareness to suss out why that is.

[Minimalist]

Glad to see you are still a shithead, huggy.  Stalin was a militant communist.  Try to sort out the difference in that pea brain of yours.