Popeye > Pope
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: October 31, 2026, 6:15 pm
Thread Rating:
|
The Pope - After a Week In 'Murrica
|
|
RE: The Pope - After a Week In 'Murrica
September 25, 2015 at 2:17 pm
(This post was last modified: September 25, 2015 at 2:21 pm by Thumpalumpacus.)
(September 25, 2015 at 1:58 pm)lkingpinl Wrote: While I agree with you, would you say this is equivalent to government spending on things you deem needless, but alas it's far worse in that you cannot choose not to pay taxes to support it, and if you do, you go to prison. No, I wouldn't say that at all, because the very man this church claims to worship abhorred the amassing of wealth. Do you think Jesus would've spent $100 million on a temple when there were 50,000 people sleeping on the streets of that very same city? As for taxes themselves and how they're spent, I have a voice in that; it's called the vote, and it is something I exercise regularly. Did Mahoney put this awful expenditure to a vote in his archdiocese? eta: And do you have nothing to say about my previous post? Even as the Church still engages in obfuscation regarding the pedophilia scandal, supporting that financially doesn't seem appropriate to me. Quote:This leaves the masses little option when decrying the moral failures of their leaders. Except to quit, king.
I still don't get how the church can claim to have a god running things, who can do anything and "provides for his followers", but it needs your money or it will fold.
How does that work? (September 25, 2015 at 12:36 pm)lkingpinl Wrote:(September 25, 2015 at 12:15 pm)Faith No More Wrote: The thing that bothers me the most is not that I think being a Catholic means that person condones what the hierarchy has done. What bothers me is that I cannot, for the life of me, think of an organization that I would hold so dearly that I could allow myself to continue to identify with it after such a heinous cover up and refusal to compensate victims, especially when that organization claims to be the voice of a loving god. How can anyone see fit to look for spiritual guidance from people that are more concerned with a holy image than they are from preventing child rape? My bold. I'd also like to say that not all those in power do these things, lol. It's not like everyone in the Vatican took wrong actions. The handful of those who did are guilty, but it's not like everyone was in on it. I'm sure that's what you meant, King, but wanted to specify for the others. I agree with this post 100%. Thanks for explaining it when I was not of the right temperament to do so.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh (September 25, 2015 at 1:58 pm)lkingpinl Wrote: While I agree with you, would you say this is equivalent to government spending on things you deem needless, but alas it's far worse in that you cannot choose not to pay taxes to support it, and if you do, you go to prison. Also, the government does not claim moral authority. The very fact that I am compulsed to pay taxes gives me a (marginal) say in how this country is run. I pay taxes therefore I get a voice, or federally a representative that has one. Enough of me can make a change in how the country is run. The Church claims to be the moral authority. While you may be in agreement with the Church's stated position, your "voice" is your tithe. You can withhold that tithe, especially if you feel that the Church hierarchy needs to perform its own atonement. Would Jesus give his money to this organization? (September 25, 2015 at 3:08 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote:(September 25, 2015 at 12:36 pm)lkingpinl Wrote: Ok, I honestly can see BOTH sides of this. I fully understand the emotional pull many have on here being ex-Catholic or family members who are Catholic as well as seeing the innumerable stories of pedophilia in the Church and the associated cover ups. Yes I was generalizing but it is a minority of those in power.
We are not made happy by what we acquire but by what we appreciate.
RE: The Pope - After a Week In 'Murrica
September 25, 2015 at 3:18 pm
(This post was last modified: September 25, 2015 at 3:18 pm by SteelCurtain.)
(September 25, 2015 at 3:08 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: I'd also like to say that not all those in power do these things, lol. It's not like everyone in the Vatican took wrong actions. The handful of those who did are guilty, but it's not like everyone was in on it. I'm sure that's what you meant, King, but wanted to specify for the others. This is why people get upset when trying to have a conversation with you, C_L. You get stuck on these ideas like "not everyone was in the wrong." That is clear, and a given. No one is saying that every single person is culpable. What we are saying is that the Church as an organization is still hiding assets, obfuscating and shuffling perpetrators, and not compensating victims. Again, not every priest is a molester, but there are still people that have molested children who are active priests. There are still Churches whom the Vatican allows to claim insolvency rather than pay victims of child rape; all the while there are items in the Vatican vault whose value lies in the hundreds of millions. Could you please respond to PT's or my statements earlier? It seems, from my end, that you are either incapable or simply unwilling of seeing fault in the hierarchical organization as a whole---not individual priests or parishes. RE: The Pope - After a Week In 'Murrica
September 25, 2015 at 3:19 pm
(This post was last modified: September 25, 2015 at 5:18 pm by abaris.)
(September 25, 2015 at 3:08 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: I'd also like to say that not all those in power do these things, lol. But it's good to keep in mind that we're talking about a state, a political as well as economical organisation, which pretty often makes headlines because of shady deals. Banco Ambrosiano and it's CEO dangling from a London bridge only being one of them. Spirituality may be part of the deal for some, but it's certainly not at the forefront when dealing with the more secular problems. I agree that this pope is refreshing as far as politics and certain socials issues are concerned, compared to his predecessors. But that doesn't change the fact, that he has a sell by date attached to his forehead, that he's as conservative as far as dogma is concerned and that noone can say, who will park his ass on the Holy See, once he's gone.
The idea remains:
Not to stop giving to the Church because you don't want to support pedophelia. Rather to stop giving to an organization until they fix a pretty fucking big problem. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



