Posts: 69247
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
259
RE: Fucking Cops: Volume II
July 12, 2017 at 1:22 pm
While you're checking, why don't you revel in the actions of this murdering pig. He shot a man in the back after lying about the incident being an "armed confrontation".
http://www.rawstory.com/2017/07/naacp-pl...c-trooper/
Quote:State Trooper Jerimy Mathis, who shot Scott, is a 20-year-veteran of the Highway Patrol, according to WITN News. He claimed that the incident occurred after Scott refused to yield, and Mathis pursued him on foot. It led to an “armed confrontation”, according to Mathis, and he ultimately shot Scott. The public now knows that the confrontation led to Scott being shot in the back. It perforated Scott’s liver, struck the gallbladder and pierced his diaphragm, the results reveal. It ultimately lodged in the fleshy tissues beneath the skin of his right chest.
A 20 year vet, huh? You know, all those donuts catch up to you after a while. That gun is a great equalizer.
Posts: 19881
Threads: 324
Joined: July 31, 2016
Reputation:
34
RE: Fucking Cops: Volume II
July 12, 2017 at 1:44 pm
See, Manowar? Strawmanning and HOW DARE YOU!!! Nothing else. Not even trying to defend his position.
Posts: 18544
Threads: 145
Joined: March 18, 2015
Reputation:
100
RE: Fucking Cops: Volume II
July 12, 2017 at 2:01 pm
(July 12, 2017 at 12:20 pm)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote: (July 12, 2017 at 10:59 am)Manowar Wrote: What do you mean apply a skeptical attitude? She clearly was thrown from chair. I try to keep an open mind with you but sometimes you try to justify some crazy shit. Please explain what you mean in detail.
manowar
I'm not talking about one incident, anecdotes are not worth the pixels needed to display them. Have you checked to see if Rev. Minny's numbers are accurate?
Still dodging and evading answering questions I see. How about instead of trying tolump eeverything together you actually answer the question about what your take in on this disabled woman's situation. Or is that too difficult for you?
Disclaimer: I am only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to understand.
(November 14, 2018 at 8:57 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: Have a good day at work. If we ever meet in a professional setting, let me answer your question now. Yes, I DO want fries with that.
Posts: 617
Threads: 110
Joined: March 20, 2011
Reputation:
8
RE: Fucking Cops: Volume II
July 12, 2017 at 3:05 pm
(July 12, 2017 at 12:20 pm)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote: (July 12, 2017 at 10:59 am)Manowar Wrote: What do you mean apply a skeptical attitude? She clearly was thrown from chair. I try to keep an open mind with you but sometimes you try to justify some crazy shit. Please explain what you mean in detail.
manowar
I'm not talking about one incident, anecdotes are not worth the pixels needed to display them. Have you checked to see if Rev. Minny's numbers are accurate?
Okay here is what I am getting from you. You don't like these horrible things happening to innocent people but they are acceptable because they are within an acceptable range for you given the amount of cops to people ratio. For me I get furious with some of the incidents that have been posted. Cops should never hurt anyone unless there is zero choice but it looks like many of the time cops shoot first and say their life was in danger, sometimes we find out they even frame innocent people. We need to fight this and you G.S. need to fight this. Deep down you know I am right.
manowar
Posts: 8277
Threads: 47
Joined: September 12, 2015
Reputation:
42
RE: Fucking Cops: Volume II
July 12, 2017 at 3:27 pm
(July 10, 2017 at 11:23 am)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote: So weak.
Hey Drumpfuck, your phrase is "so sad".
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli
Home
Posts: 19881
Threads: 324
Joined: July 31, 2016
Reputation:
34
RE: Fucking Cops: Volume II
July 12, 2017 at 3:29 pm
(July 12, 2017 at 3:05 pm)Manowar Wrote: (July 12, 2017 at 12:20 pm)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote: I'm not talking about one incident, anecdotes are not worth the pixels needed to display them. Have you checked to see if Rev. Minny's numbers are accurate?
Okay here is what I am getting from you. You don't like these horrible things happening to innocent people but they are acceptable because they are within an acceptable range for you given the amount of cops to people ratio. For me I get furious with some of the incidents that have been posted. Cops should never hurt anyone unless there is zero choice but it looks like many of the time cops shoot first and say their life was in danger, sometimes we find out they even frame innocent people. We need to fight this and you G.S. need to fight this. Deep down you know I am right.
manowar
1. Where did I say anything was acceptable?
2. I am, insofar as I've seen, the only one who has actually interacted with the police to let them know we're watching them. I was on the civilian oversight board in San Diego when I was on active duty with the Navy.
3. Yes, there are cops who need to have their chain yanked hard. Nobody else in this thread is doing shit other than being internet tough guys.
Posts: 18544
Threads: 145
Joined: March 18, 2015
Reputation:
100
RE: Fucking Cops: Volume II
July 12, 2017 at 10:39 pm
Well what do ya know? This is a forum. People are supposed to post things. Min has a right to post whatever he wants. On this here forum.
Funny but out of all the active members here, you're the only one I see bitching about the posts on this thread. You've been told before that if you don't like it, why not start a thread showing stories of police doing good. You've failed to do so. The only reason I can think of as to why you won't start one is because there just aren't enough stories of cops actually doing good. Or you're just full of shit and too fucking lazy to start one.
Disclaimer: I am only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to understand.
(November 14, 2018 at 8:57 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: Have a good day at work. If we ever meet in a professional setting, let me answer your question now. Yes, I DO want fries with that.
Posts: 69247
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
259
RE: Fucking Cops: Volume II
July 12, 2017 at 10:58 pm
Poor G/S - everybody picking on his heroic cops. Such a shame. I wonder how many cops you "disciplined?" And I wonder how many you let go scot free. your credibility is exactly zero here.
Here's another hero beating the shit out of homeless woman with his baton. His department gave it the customary wink and nod.... until the video surfaced.
Now they have to go through the motions and make it look like they give a flying fuck.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/12/us/po...c=rss&_r=0
Posts: 19881
Threads: 324
Joined: July 31, 2016
Reputation:
34
RE: Fucking Cops: Volume II
July 13, 2017 at 6:56 am
Thanks for reinforcing my point, Rev.
Posts: 1897
Threads: 33
Joined: August 25, 2015
Reputation:
27
RE: Fucking Cops: Volume II
July 13, 2017 at 10:19 am
(This post was last modified: July 13, 2017 at 10:40 am by Divinity.)
The only way to fix this problem is to teach everyone that you can't automatically trust cops. Get people to stop worshiping them, and they may actually have to face justice themselves.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post...545559744f
Easy mistake to make. Seeing a 5'2 girl and mistaking her for 5'10. I think my 5'4 daughter is 6 feet tall all the time. Oh wait, no I dont'. I'm not a fucking dipshit.
|