Good luck with arguing the finer points with someone staying willfully ignorant. It's like water on a teflon pan.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 13, 2024, 1:33 pm
Thread Rating:
What are the evidence for no god?
|
(October 17, 2015 at 5:10 pm)I_am_not_mafia Wrote:(October 17, 2015 at 9:30 am)Blondie Wrote: Something was there to start it. Exactly. If the alternative explanation for the whole range of scientific investigations is basically "magic", then sorry but the alphabet blocks are over there.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
(October 17, 2015 at 5:07 pm)abaris Wrote: Why are you after this ignoramus anyway? (No offense to our member, of course) Fundamentally ignorant persons can be a bit of a nuisance, but if you're out to ban every uninformed idiot, you have your work cut out for you. Also, I see no reason to ban an idiot for being an idiot. I don't consider him to be merely an ignorant person. He is clearly a troll and only here to disrupt. Unless you think he genuinely believes he is the Son of God? He's obviously only here to cause trouble... I understand there's no way to prove that but I'm just saying that it's a shame that there isn't a way. (October 17, 2015 at 5:18 pm)Evie Wrote: He is clearly a troll and only here to disrupt. Unless you think he genuinely believes he is the Son of God? This Blondie character did that? Wasn't that brentsomewhat, can't remember every drop in the flood of idiocy. (October 17, 2015 at 11:44 am)IATIA Wrote:(October 17, 2015 at 11:35 am)Blondie Wrote: Yes I said satanism. It is a blunt slap in God's face that a Satanist rejects Him. The God of the Bible is exactly of who He is. Now Lucifer was the Arch Angel of Worship. When Lucifer was kicked out, he then became Satan and a 1/3 of the stars fell with him. Stars represent the fallen angels who have became Satan's band of demons. This is all described in Isaiah and Revelation. Now the symbols. The upside down cross with the broken pieces is the sign of rejection of Jesus. What I don't get is Satanists claim it, but the Apostle Peter was crucified upside down. The peace sign that was part of the hippie movement in the 1960's is a sign of rebellion. Two of them were youtube videos. Rebellion is rebellion. I do not care if it was war, government, or against your mama. I don't care. The 60's was before my time anyway. So I could care less. Just because you don't like a Christian site does not mean that they are wrong on the Satanist's symbols. (October 17, 2015 at 6:15 pm)abaris Wrote:(October 17, 2015 at 5:18 pm)Evie Wrote: He is clearly a troll and only here to disrupt. Unless you think he genuinely believes he is the Son of God? Ah, misunderstanding completely, it was the JBrentonK guy I was talking about. I was saying it is a pity it's difficult to define the rules in such a way to prevent people like JBrentonK from clearly only being here to disrupt the forums. I'm not saying that of Blondie at all. He/she may annoy me a bit but I totally wasn't calling him/her a troll. (October 17, 2015 at 5:10 pm)I_am_not_mafia Wrote:(October 17, 2015 at 9:30 am)Blondie Wrote: matter is neither created or destroyed. Therefore you can't make something out of nothing.#
Where is the evidence for no Odin, for no Isis, for no Zeus?
It comes down to the LACK of any evidence for any of those beings. In the fact that archaeological evidence - evidence we actually DO have- contradicts many of the claims of the 'holy' books. And there is the fact that the books the Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni: "You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???"
Yep, burden of proof guys, burden of proof. You claim god, onus is on you.
Stimbo
(October 17, 2015 at 11:43 am)Blondie Wrote: Yeah you first. Where is your missing link for macro evolution? Why are there still monkeys? Wouldn't all monkeys be extinct since they have no use on earth anymore since their human counter parts are here? Gravity exist. Please show me I am at least communicating to a half way intelligent person. Yeah, you're getting my bill for a new irony meter. If that is what you want to do. For evolution to be possible, all monkeys, gorillas, etc would be extinct. Mother nature as atheists would say would no longer have any use for these creatures. My self image is that I am a more supreme being than monkeys so no I did not evolve from monkeys. So therefore macro-evolution is bullcrap. Micro-evolution, however, I will go along with because every creature adapts to its environment. Men re-write religion to suit their needs. Hence the different splits of religions. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)