Muslims: Stupid Beliefs by The Amazing Atheist

[The_Flying_Skeptic]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5jnBMZlS9Ss

[Killman]

The Amazing Atheist is quite funny and most of his videos have plenty of valid information in them. Some of his latest work has not really been up to par though, except for his Justin Bieber Sucks video, that was gold.

[Minimalist]

Pat Condell is funnier.

[Scented Nectar]

I'm going to stay pissed off at the Amazing Atheist until he takes back what he said about child rape by priests being as insignificant as consentual but technically underage sex among kids. Seems to not see the difference between rape and consentual sex, and between sex among peers compared to sex with an authority figure (including hell threats for not obeying god's spokesmen).

Otherwise I like TAA's stuff, and that's a really good video above. If I ever hear that he's revoked the childrape being insignificant statement, I'll resubscribe to him.

[leo-rcc]

TJ stopped being funny a long time ago. I don't know why I am still subbed to his channel to be honest.

[Tiberius]

Pat Condell is funnier.

Pat Condell just rants, and he's revealed himself as a bigot more and more in recent weeks.

[Minimalist]

Because he doesn't approve of muslim activities?

Bill Maher makes an interesting distinction on that score. He says "he is not pre-judging... he is JUDGING."

And he finds islam as seriously wanting as Condell.

[Tiberius]

No, because despite the fact that he has said he isn't against "all muslims" and only the radical ones, he still opposes a mosque and community center 2 blocks away from Ground Zero. He claims it's making a mockery of those who died, despite the fact that muslims (innocent ones) died in those attacks as well. It's also being built by a guy who has worked for the past 25 years trying to improve Islamic relations with the west, and as such the center is open to everyone.

There is literally no difference between building this mosque and building a cathedral. Condell only opposes it because he is a hypocrite who says he "loves freedom" but somehow only thinks it applies if people are non-muslim.

[Minimalist]

There are many people who agree with him.

I, also, think that building a mosque at that site is little more than a provocation.

You know, I am against the attempts to restrict illegal immigration here. Mexicans who come to America are perfectly willing to learn English and want to fit in. They work like dogs. What Condell seems to object to are the islamic types who have come to Britain - presumably because they want something better - and then turn around and seek to impose their beliefs on everyone else.

If the Mexicans were looking to turn Arizona in Mexico I'd be lined up on the border with a gun, too. Fuck that. You want to COME HERE - you adapt to us. We don't adapt to you.

[cocoanut]

I prefer Paul's Ego; he's more fun to watch.

http://www.youtube.com/user/PaulsEgo

No, because despite the fact that he has said he isn't against "all muslims" and only the radical ones, he still opposes a mosque and community center 2 blocks away from Ground Zero. He claims it's making a mockery of those who died, despite the fact that muslims (innocent ones) died in those attacks as well. It's also being built by a guy who has worked for the past 25 years trying to improve Islamic relations with the west, and as such the center is open to everyone.

Actually I am just as opposed to it as well. You can call me a bigot despite my Muslim friends, maybe I am, but I actually don't see why it has to be SO CLOSE to Ground Zero. It seems like an obvious provocation. And even if it's not supposed to be, I'm sure radical Muslims in Iraq and Afghanistan and everywhere are following along with the news and laughing in our faces anyway.