Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 19, 2024, 10:25 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
A question for theists Part V - A new hope
#11
RE: A question for theists Part V - A new hope
(November 14, 2015 at 4:41 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote:
(November 9, 2015 at 1:48 pm)Lek Wrote: I think its a good thing because getting involved in the government has always tended to corrupt and dilute christianity.  Western christianity has come to look more like the secular world rather than to be the counterculture that it should be.  Pure christianity should be distinguishable from the secular culture, not mirror it.  Jesus wan't concerned about running the government, but rather relating on an individual basis.

This^

^ you both don't get it were secular for a good reason if we were a theocracy we would be taking leaps and bounds backwards. 
But then again we should have been a theocracy to begin with then the majority would be atheists by now.
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today. 


Code:
<iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&amp;auto_play=false&amp;hide_related=false&amp;show_comments=true&amp;show_user=true&amp;show_reposts=false&amp;visual=true"></iframe>
Reply
#12
RE: A question for theists Part V - A new hope
(November 14, 2015 at 5:55 pm)dyresand Wrote:
(November 14, 2015 at 4:41 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: This^

^ you both don't get it were secular for a good reason if we were a theocracy we would be taking leaps and bounds backwards. 
But then again we should have been a theocracy to begin with then the majority would be atheists by now.

I believe we are both trying to say that a theocracy is not a good thing Dyresand.
Reply
#13
RE: A question for theists Part V - A new hope
(November 14, 2015 at 7:07 pm)Lek Wrote:
(November 14, 2015 at 5:55 pm)dyresand Wrote: ^ you both don't get it were secular for a good reason if we were a theocracy we would be taking leaps and bounds backwards. 
But then again we should have been a theocracy to begin with then the majority would be atheists by now.

I believe we are both trying to say that a theocracy is not a good thing Dyresand.

oh hey at least were on the same side of things.
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today. 


Code:
<iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&amp;auto_play=false&amp;hide_related=false&amp;show_comments=true&amp;show_user=true&amp;show_reposts=false&amp;visual=true"></iframe>
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Question to theists: When to take the bible literally? T.J. 22 1829 November 26, 2021 at 6:14 pm
Last Post: onlinebiker
  How can a Christian reject part of the Bible and still call themselves a Christian? KUSA 371 88809 May 3, 2020 at 1:04 am
Last Post: Paleophyte
  Question to Theists? kartronic 10 2141 May 30, 2019 at 9:11 pm
Last Post: Jehanne
  Remember this part in the bible? Foxaèr 17 2931 June 20, 2017 at 11:38 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  A serious question for theists dyresand 35 4877 November 12, 2016 at 7:06 pm
Last Post: Funky_Gibbon
  Ethics question for theists - serious - looking for opinions not argument. drfuzzy 36 4775 September 27, 2016 at 1:39 pm
Last Post: drfuzzy
  Rewriting the bible part 5 - duderonomy (Deuteronomy) dyresand 6 1702 March 23, 2016 at 3:38 am
Last Post: Alex K
  rewriting the bible part 2 - exodus dyresand 68 14402 March 21, 2016 at 10:13 am
Last Post: Aractus
  Rewriting the bible part 4 - Numbers dyresand 2 1020 March 15, 2016 at 9:07 pm
Last Post: Cecelia
  rewriting the bible part 3 - Leviticus dyresand 11 3149 March 14, 2016 at 10:43 pm
Last Post: dyresand



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)