For those who want proof of the exodus

[Cyberman]

FSM = this guy:

[Minimalist]

Ramen.

[Edwardo Piet]

The fuck is FSM?

BLASPHEMY. You have sinned. You have sinned so very very badly for not knowing the name of Your Lord:



http://www.venganza.org/

[Minimalist]

Meanwhile, back to exodus...the FSM solves the mystery.

[Edwardo Piet]

[Heat]

How about stop abbreviating because this ISN'T A FUCKING CELL PHONE YOU TEENAGE GIRLS.

[Cyberman]

K. Sry. Pls 4give us.

[Drich]

The STORY of exodus was written around the 7th or 8th BCE and possibly 13th century BCE.
There is no proof that it happened the Egyptians like the Romans kept records they would have written something
down about the people in the exodus story, but there isn't. Not to mention the cities mentioned in
exodus never existed such as Pithom it wasn't a major settlement before the 26th Century. But it was
called by another name Tckenu to be exact. Edom wasn't a nation yet, it turned into a nation in 800 bce.
The fortress of Nuweiba is Ottoman not Pharonic. Parting the red sea... come on Dirch.. i respect you
as a human but come on.. buddy.... even if such a thing where  possible they would be walking through a
765m trench to their deaths, simply put they wouldn't make it far before the wave comes and kills them all.

Watch the movie sport.  in it contains the documented and accepted egyptian documents that support the exodus!
I even posted a link to the document that describes the plagues.

That is what this whole thread is about. The idea that "scholars" say one thing and the truth is completely different.

[Drich]

The Bible Reloaded chaps view these stories as after-the-fact explanations of why events occured, why a load of people died, and why a new king suddenly took power etc.

Funny enough the older versions of the bible are dramatically different than the newer ones. Considering older bible god has a wife there is 
multiple gods etc.

Such as?? Which translation?
-Or do you not understand that the bible (all of them) are translations from 2/3rd century documents, and have been from the beginning?

Are you just saying stuff that people want to hear and you think is true?

[Drich]

LOL.  Well, it took another 7 minutes but at the 25 minute mark who does Mahoney introduce as his "savior?"  David Rohl:  Crackpot extraordinaire.  I should make predictions for a living!

The problem with a bozo like drippy is that he willingly believes whatever the fuck he wants to believe and in response to my calling Rohl a crackpot or introducing reputable Eqyptologists to dispute his absurd nonsense he will simply stick his head up his ass and insist that everyone is against his new found messiah.

Fortunately, Rohl is such a shit that he has pissed off xtians, too.

So, even though I think these people are pushing a phony agenda, too, I will let them rip Rohl a new asshole.

Here you go, drippy.  Just for you.

These are xtian shitheads tearing into your new hero.

http://www.biblearchaeology.org/post/200...stine.aspx

CONCLUSION

It is abundantly clear that, from a Palestinian perspective, Rohl's hypothesis is quite unworkable. Rather than enhancing the connections between archaeology and the Bible, his new chronology would destroy the many strong correlations that exist when the standard chronology is followed.

Sucks to be you, drippy.

The narrative here seems to say that Rohl's idea was to move Ramses/The third Kingdom forward in time. Again this is not what the movie states at all. Rohl's Roll in the movie was to explain how a forward time sift would benfit the bible narrative. The movie at no point tries and moves the third kingdom forward minnie it simple shortens the Dark time, time line between the middle kingdom and the 3rd Kingdom. The third kingdom/Ramses Kingdom does not move in time.

What this does do is move everything before Egypt's third dark age up 300 years, it does nothing after the fact. Meaning all your little objections per Rohl's book are invalid.

Understand old sport, this movie is not based on Rohl's book nor any other single piece of evidence. Rohl as with all the other documents and verfiable histroy are all pieces to a greater puzzle. One not depending on another. Finish watching the video, it explains all of this.

Oh, and keep your day job your ability to predict anything seems to be alittle more than just 'wanting.'