Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 2, 2024, 4:33 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 3 Vote(s) - 2.67 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Richard Dawkins Faith In Memes Is As Blind As A Christian's to God
#71
RE: Richard Dawkins Faith In Memes Is As Blind As A Christian's to God
i didn't ask you what mattered in the similarity. i asked you which selection mechanisms didn't matter, cos you said some selection mechanisms didn't matter. also, the selection IS the mechanism. and you say john gray knows nothing of evolution! sheesh.

but ignore all that because i have the final nail in the coffin that proves memetics isn't science. should have done this a long time ago:

the definition of science: (drum roll) knowledge covering general truths of the operation of general laws, as obtained and tested through scientific method [and] concerned with the physical world.

with the PHYSICAL world.

as many of you have said many times, memes are not physical, therefor they are not science.

you've been great.
Reply
#72
RE: Richard Dawkins Faith In Memes Is As Blind As A Christian's to God
(July 19, 2010 at 6:56 pm)Cecco Wrote: and if you were to muster the courage to delve further into his work you would find that he is very well versed in evolution. until you know more about him, do not decide for yourself what he knows and what he doesn't. a glance at wikipedia does not bring all the answers.

and i think 'Why would I be interested in his non-meme stuff when I'm not even very impressed with what he wrote on memes' sums up your attitude entirely: if a man isn't agreeable on everything, then he is not agreeable at all.
Get over it. I've never even heard of him before your mention of him. Why would you expect me to be nuts about him like you are? If what you quoted was more interesting, and not as full of misconceptions as it appears, then maybe I would have been interested in other stuff he writes. Or not. It's not reasonable for you to quote someone I've never heard of and then expect me to go chasing after everything he's ever read before having an opinion about the quoted part. Also, where did I declare that he's not agreeable at all? How the fuck would I know that when I'm not interested enough in his other stuff to even know if I agree?

Hahah, you are him, aren't you? The misconception stuff is too similar. Or is it that you are getting all your wrong ideas about memes from him?
(July 19, 2010 at 7:12 pm)Cecco Wrote: i didn't ask you what mattered in the similarity. i asked you which selection mechanisms didn't matter, cos you said some selection mechanisms didn't matter. also, the selection IS the mechanism. and you say john gray knows nothing of evolution! sheesh.

but ignore all that because i have the final nail in the coffin that proves memetics isn't science. should have done this a long time ago:

the definition of science: (drum roll) knowledge covering general truths of the operation of general laws, as obtained and tested through scientific method [and] concerned with the physical world.

with the PHYSICAL world.

as many of you have said many times, memes are not physical, therefor they are not science.

you've been great.
Oh I almost don't believe it!!! Are you this stubbornly ignorant on purpose? It's the fact that the selection happens, not which particular mechanism it's using that is important in the evolution part of it. Genes use sex mostly, and memes use all the various ways ideas get popular (eg. people like them, or maybe people are forced into them as with theocratic laws, both of these examples result in selection).

Memes, ideas, concepts, beliefs, customs, rituals, all those things are not physically real either, but THEY DO AFFECT THE PHYSICAL WORLD, and are a part of how we behave and interact with it. Think things out please. Behaviours and beliefs can be measured, tracked, analysed, seen statistically, etc.

You have not been great. Tiring though yes, you've been tiring.
I'm really shitty at giving kudos and rep. That's because I would be inconsistent in remembering to do them, and also I don't really want it to show if any favouritism is happening. Even worse would be inconsistencies causing false favouritisms to show. So, fuck it. Just assume that I've given you some good rep and a number of kudos, and everyone should be happy...
Reply
#73
RE: Richard Dawkins Faith In Memes Is As Blind As A Christian's to God
'It's not reasonable for you to quote someone I've never heard of and then expect me to go chasing after everything he's ever read before having an opinion about the quoted part'

i don't expect you to read everything, just a bit more than his wiki page before judging him. it is unreasonable to presume you know him when you don't, that's all. you really will concede nothing.

behaviours and beliefs can be measured, but only in sociological terms, not in scientific. for example, the concept of freedom can only be discussed in sociological terms. there is no way to scientifically discuss freedom.

that which isn't physical isn't real. it is merely concept, merely philosophy. how on earth can you be sure that something that isn't physical exists? it is exactly the same defence as people who believe ghosts and spirits. everything that can be said to exist does so in the physical world. where else is there to exist? i would include every thing, thoughts, ideas, concepts, to exist in the physical world just like everything else. if you are claiming that for some reason human thought it special compared to everything else in the universe in that it exists outside of the physical world, then the onus is on you to prove it.

where do memes exist? where does something that isn't physical exist?
Reply
#74
RE: Richard Dawkins Faith In Memes Is As Blind As A Christian's to God
Cecco, it's good that I am usually a non-violent sort of person, otherwise I would have to graphically describe myself smacking you silly.

Arrrgh.
I'm really shitty at giving kudos and rep. That's because I would be inconsistent in remembering to do them, and also I don't really want it to show if any favouritism is happening. Even worse would be inconsistencies causing false favouritisms to show. So, fuck it. Just assume that I've given you some good rep and a number of kudos, and everyone should be happy...
Reply
#75
RE: Richard Dawkins Faith In Memes Is As Blind As A Christian's to God
question ducked. don't get so emotionally involved. forget ego. forget me and you. think only of idea. answer my last question.
Reply
#76
RE: Richard Dawkins Faith In Memes Is As Blind As A Christian's to God
(July 19, 2010 at 9:47 pm)Cecco Wrote: question ducked. don't get so emotionally involved. forget ego. forget me and you. think only of idea. answer my last question.
My only emotion is frustration at your willful stupidity. Don't tell me not to feel that, since that won't go away until you stop being such a mixture of both ignorance and making up new ridiculous meanings into things. And answer your own last question. You have been nicely given enough explanations already to do so easily. You are quite a demanding one, aren't you? You are not owed answers to anything by anyone.
I'm really shitty at giving kudos and rep. That's because I would be inconsistent in remembering to do them, and also I don't really want it to show if any favouritism is happening. Even worse would be inconsistencies causing false favouritisms to show. So, fuck it. Just assume that I've given you some good rep and a number of kudos, and everyone should be happy...
Reply
#77
RE: Richard Dawkins Faith In Memes Is As Blind As A Christian's to God
ducked.
Reply
#78
RE: Richard Dawkins Faith In Memes Is As Blind As A Christian's to God
fucked.
I'm really shitty at giving kudos and rep. That's because I would be inconsistent in remembering to do them, and also I don't really want it to show if any favouritism is happening. Even worse would be inconsistencies causing false favouritisms to show. So, fuck it. Just assume that I've given you some good rep and a number of kudos, and everyone should be happy...
Reply
#79
RE: Richard Dawkins Faith In Memes Is As Blind As A Christian's to God
(July 19, 2010 at 8:31 pm)Cecco Wrote: where do memes exist? where does something that isn't physical exist?

I love my family. Wink Shades



You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.

Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.




 








Reply
#80
RE: Richard Dawkins Faith In Memes Is As Blind As A Christian's to God
Do you believe in ideas? Do you believe ideas can develop, or "evolve" over time?

Yes?

Then guess what? You believe in memes. That's what memes are defined as. They are analogous to genes. That's where they get their name.

EvF
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Good Faith Media: Global Christian Population to reach 3.3 BN by 2050. Nishant Xavier 270 20711 September 30, 2023 at 10:49 am
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Dawkins, Rowling, Sunak et al on Trans Issue and Women's Rights. Nishant Xavier 63 5196 July 15, 2023 at 12:50 am
Last Post: Paleophyte
  why do people still have faith in god even after seeing their land turned into dust? zempo 8 1740 June 20, 2021 at 8:16 am
Last Post: onlinebiker
  Dawkins loses humanist title Silver 165 11947 June 6, 2021 at 1:45 am
Last Post: Peebothuhlu
  Question about "faith" rockyrockford 428 46777 December 22, 2020 at 9:50 am
Last Post: Apollo
  Local woman says only way she has survived during COVID is faith Tomatoshadow2 41 3984 December 21, 2020 at 4:56 pm
Last Post: HappySkeptic
  Richard Dawkins interviews Saudi Arabian atheist Rana Ahmad AniKoferBo 2 945 July 22, 2020 at 12:40 pm
Last Post: Brian37
  Ricky Gervais won Dawkins award this year Fake Messiah 13 2900 September 6, 2019 at 8:25 pm
Last Post: brewer
  Dawkins writing kid's version of "The God Delusion" - you mad bro? Silver 35 6878 August 2, 2018 at 9:08 pm
Last Post: brewer
  Geoff Robson has a hardon for Dawkins Silver 7 1962 May 10, 2018 at 5:55 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)