Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 21, 2024, 12:56 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
David Icke
#51
RE: David Icke
Paul -

Yes.
Reply
#52
RE: David Icke
Mmhmm. And do you care to share these reasons to believe that the color turquoise (or purple) is a conduit for positive energies? And while you're at it, maybe you could explain what you imagine 'positive energies' are.
Reply
#53
RE: David Icke
Paul -

My reason to believe that colours are connected to energy is that I feel that that's how it is. I believe that positive energy is is energy which is positive.
Reply
#54
RE: David Icke
I was quite surprised when I logged in and saw a thread about David Icke lmfao. I shamefully read a book or two by him and I agree with most of my peers on this site, this man is fucking nuts beyond belief. According to him anyone and everyone that holds a position of power is either an alien lizard in disguise reminiscent of the movie 'They live' a great movie by the way starring the wrestler Roddy Piper or being controlled by said aliens. This thread should not be posted in the politics and history forums but rather in its own category of mentally unstable authors.
There is nothing people will not maintain when they are slaves to superstition

http://chatpilot-godisamyth.blogspot.com/

Reply
#55
RE: David Icke
@Godhead: I see. So the answer is actually no, you don't have any coherent or convincing reasons to believe that. At least, not beyond your own imagination and desire for the claim to be true. The "I like this idea, so I believe it" method. Nothing irrational about that.
Reply
#56
RE: David Icke
Paul -

It's perfectly rational and convincing, and coherent.
Reply
#57
RE: David Icke
(July 18, 2010 at 1:20 pm)Godhead Wrote: Paul -

It's perfectly rational and convincing, and coherent.

It may be personally satisfying but there is nothing rational in stating that because you like the idea of something being true therefore you will believe it's true.

I like the idea of having Q like omnipotence and sorting out the worlds problems and possibly terraforming Mars and giving it to the Lemurs but I don't actually believe I have or can.
[Image: cinjin_banner_border.jpg]
Reply
#58
RE: David Icke
(July 18, 2010 at 1:28 pm)Darwinian Wrote: It may be personally satisfying but there is nothing rational in stating that because you like the idea of something being true therefore you will believe it's true.

I like the idea of having Q like omnipotence and sorting out the worlds problems and possibly terraforming Mars and giving it to the Lemurs but I don't actually believe I have or can.

Sounds pretty reasonable to me, Darwinian. Now you're not going to put me through some bizarre test like you did with Captain Picard, are you?

(What do I win for the Star Trek reference?)
'We must respect the other fellow's religion, but only in the sense and to the extent that we respect his theory that his wife is beautiful and his children smart.' H.L. Mencken

'False religion' is the ultimate tautology.

'It is just like man's vanity and impertinence to call an animal dumb because it is dumb to his dull perceptions.' Mark Twain

'I care not much for a man's religion whose dog and cat are not the better for it.' Abraham Lincoln
Reply
#59
RE: David Icke
(July 18, 2010 at 1:20 pm)Godhead Wrote: It's perfectly rational and convincing, and coherent.
It's really not rational and convincing. Even if you claim it's "just a belief", the reasons for believing the belief are completely irrational, hence there is no reason to believe.

There are many things we like that are simply not true (by that I mean non-existent). I'd quite like to have a teleporter, but they don't exist. Me liking an idea (in this case a teleporter) does nothing to affect the existence of said teleporter, and so there is no logical reason to believe it does exist. Indeed, the only way liking an idea can affect the physical manifestation of the idea is if someone gets off their arse and does something about it.

So your logic is fallacious, and so your mantra of "I like it so I believe it" is irrational, and in being irrational, is unconvincing to the rational mind.

You are right on one thing though; it is coherent, but being coherent has nothing to do with being rational or convincing.
Reply
#60
RE: David Icke
(July 18, 2010 at 3:49 pm)The Omnissiunt One Wrote: Sounds pretty reasonable to me, Darwinian. Now you're not going to put me through some bizarre test like you did with Captain Picard, are you?

(What do I win for the Star Trek reference?)

When I get my membership to the continuum I'll put in a good word for you as well Wink
[Image: cinjin_banner_border.jpg]
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  David Brooks in the NY Times on Trump's inaugural day Whateverist 9 2178 January 20, 2017 at 1:49 pm
Last Post: Crossless2.0
  2 Billion pounds for Syrian aid given by David Cameron. paulpablo 52 7355 February 8, 2016 at 12:58 pm
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  David Koch Heywood 34 6333 December 16, 2014 at 2:28 pm
Last Post: Crossless2.0
  David Icke Lemonvariable72 6 2034 January 5, 2014 at 2:16 pm
Last Post: StuW
  The Sins Of General David Petraeus Silas Stingy 22 6833 November 12, 2012 at 5:23 pm
Last Post: Something completely different
  David Cameron Darwinian 12 4882 December 19, 2011 at 1:23 pm
Last Post: Darwinian
  David Cameron says Britain is a Christian country. downbeatplumb 10 6123 December 16, 2011 at 5:52 pm
Last Post: TheDarkestOfAngels
  David Cameron Pretending to be Common frankiej 0 1116 August 21, 2011 at 2:44 pm
Last Post: frankiej



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)