Posts: 6843
Threads: 0
Joined: February 22, 2014
Reputation:
15
RE: Trump versus Clinton?
March 16, 2016 at 3:34 am
(March 14, 2016 at 3:35 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Better get busy, K. Your party needs you.
http://www.truth-out.org/buzzflash/comme...l-election
Quote:As Demographics Shift, GOP Needs More Racists to Win Presidential Election
Typical Jewish propaganda. The writer is fearful that Trump will actually win the Presidency and be fair with the Palestinians. If Trump does in fact need 7 out of 10 white guys to vote for him and it's such a long shot as the writer claims why even bother to write the article? What he did was to claim that those voters would all be racists, in an attempt to discourage them from voting for Trump.
All of the candidates are racists. All of the Presidents have been racists. Most of the people are racists. They just don't always like to be called racists. But Trump is the racist we need now because the other racists won't do a damn thing positive for anyone except for themselves. Trump may end up doing at least one or two positive things for the country. The others won't do anything at all.
Posts: 6610
Threads: 73
Joined: May 31, 2014
Reputation:
56
RE: Trump versus Clinton?
March 16, 2016 at 5:18 am
Well, probability-wise, it's over for Sanders. So now I have to hope you Americans vote for Clinton as President instead. Shit choice, but better than the other option ...
Posts: 6843
Threads: 0
Joined: February 22, 2014
Reputation:
15
RE: Trump versus Clinton?
March 17, 2016 at 4:47 pm
(March 16, 2016 at 5:18 am)Irrational Wrote: Well, probability-wise, it's over for Sanders. So now I have to hope you Americans vote for Clinton as President instead. Shit choice, but better than the other option ... Trump wants to end the free ride that the foreigners have been getting.
Posts: 4664
Threads: 100
Joined: November 22, 2013
Reputation:
39
Trump versus Clinton?
March 17, 2016 at 4:50 pm
(March 16, 2016 at 5:18 am)Irrational Wrote: Well, probability-wise, it's over for Sanders. So now I have to hope you Americans vote for Clinton as President instead. Shit choice, but better than the other option ...
I won't make that shit choice. I talk Trump up everyday to all I meet. There will be a record breaking turnout for him.
Posts: 30726
Threads: 2123
Joined: May 24, 2012
Reputation:
71
RE: Trump versus Clinton?
March 17, 2016 at 4:57 pm
(March 17, 2016 at 4:47 pm)Wyrd of Gawd Wrote: (March 16, 2016 at 5:18 am)Irrational Wrote: Well, probability-wise, it's over for Sanders. So now I have to hope you Americans vote for Clinton as President instead. Shit choice, but better than the other option ... Trump wants to end the free ride that the foreigners have been getting.
BULLSHIT, if you think with all the crap he has made with cheap labor overseas he's going to stop that you are a moron. If you put Mien Drumpf on a polygraph he'd cause it to explode.
Posts: 30726
Threads: 2123
Joined: May 24, 2012
Reputation:
71
RE: Trump versus Clinton?
March 17, 2016 at 5:08 pm
(March 17, 2016 at 4:50 pm)KUSA Wrote: (March 16, 2016 at 5:18 am)Irrational Wrote: Well, probability-wise, it's over for Sanders. So now I have to hope you Americans vote for Clinton as President instead. Shit choice, but better than the other option ...
I won't make that shit choice. I talk Trump up everyday to all I meet. There will be a record breaking turnout for him.
Keep thinking that, he has pissed off the establishment of his party, for all the swing voters he may attract, could easily get negated by the base that doesn't like him.
Oh and again, when you look at the history of both parties when one is fractured and has a nominee the party reluctantly supports, that party has it's ass handed to them. I think you are putting your eggs before the cart. Ted is still in it, and he could very easily keep Trump from getting the number he needs.
And with all his hate and fear, even if he does get nominated, the Democratic Party is going to have a field day with his language. I can imagine the adds now,
"Is this whom you want giving a State Of The Union Address" " They are rapists" "I'm going to stick it to China" "I'd like to punch them in the face" or meeting world leaders?
Nope, sorry global politics alone precludes him from holding office. His nasty rhetoric cannot occupy that office. He's damaged goods. Talk like his is good for cable radio and Jerry Springer, but giving a middle finger to an Mexicians and China and Muslims, nope. You can look forward to some very nasty times if that sicko gets elected. But he wont in any case.
Posts: 4664
Threads: 100
Joined: November 22, 2013
Reputation:
39
Trump versus Clinton?
March 17, 2016 at 5:28 pm
(March 17, 2016 at 5:08 pm)Brian37 Wrote: Keep thinking that, he has pissed off the establishment of his party, for all the swing voters he may attract, could easily get negated by the base that doesn't like him. Who do you think the establishment is?
Quote:Oh and again, when you look at the history of both parties when one is fractured and has a nominee the party reluctantly supports, that party has it's ass handed to them.
This time it's going to be different. People are exited about Trump.
Quote:I think you are putting your eggs before the cart. Ted is still in it, and he could very easily keep Trump from getting the number he needs.
Lying Ted won't win and Trump will get nominated.
Quote:And with all his hate and fear, even if he does get nominated, the Democratic Party is going to have a field day with his language.
Every time Trump is attacked for his shit talking, his numbers go up. I hope the Dems talk the trash. It will help us.
Quote:I can imagine the adds now,
"Is this whom you want giving a State Of The Union Address" " They are rapists" "I'm going to stick it to China" "I'd like to punch them in the face" or meeting world leaders?
It will not be boring like that dumbass Obama.
Quote:Nope, sorry global politics alone precludes him from holding office. His nasty rhetoric cannot occupy that office. He's damaged goods. Talk like his is good for cable radio and Jerry Springer, but giving a middle finger to an Mexicians and China and Muslims, nope. You can look forward to some very nasty times if that sicko gets elected. But he wont in any case.
He will mellow out when in office. Most of this is a show to get the libtard media to give him free air time.
Posts: 13122
Threads: 130
Joined: October 18, 2014
Reputation:
55
RE: Trump versus Clinton?
March 17, 2016 at 6:09 pm
(March 17, 2016 at 4:57 pm)Brian37 Wrote: BULLSHIT, if you think with all the crap he has made with cheap labor overseas he's going to stop that you are a moron. If you put Mien Drumpf on a polygraph he'd cause it to explode.
Why don't you even insert an if between Wyrd and moron. Someone still burrying his head so deeply in the ass end of the 20th century doesn't come over as overly intelligent or educated.
Posts: 30726
Threads: 2123
Joined: May 24, 2012
Reputation:
71
RE: Trump versus Clinton?
March 17, 2016 at 7:36 pm
Holly fucking shit, I am watching C-SPAN of covering China's economy an official is talking about their economy, it is official, they are run by the same right wing corporate whores we are. "Don't tax the rich" is their mantra too.
The entire planet is a plutocracy.
Posts: 30726
Threads: 2123
Joined: May 24, 2012
Reputation:
71
RE: Trump versus Clinton?
March 17, 2016 at 7:59 pm
(March 17, 2016 at 5:28 pm)KUSA Wrote: (March 17, 2016 at 5:08 pm)Brian37 Wrote: Keep thinking that, he has pissed off the establishment of his party, for all the swing voters he may attract, could easily get negated by the base that doesn't like him. Who do you think the establishment is?
Quote:Oh and again, when you look at the history of both parties when one is fractured and has a nominee the party reluctantly supports, that party has it's ass handed to them.
This time it's going to be different. People are exited about Trump.
Quote:I think you are putting your eggs before the cart. Ted is still in it, and he could very easily keep Trump from getting the number he needs.
Lying Ted won't win and Trump will get nominated.
Quote:And with all his hate and fear, even if he does get nominated, the Democratic Party is going to have a field day with his language.
Every time Trump is attacked for his shit talking, his numbers go up. I hope the Dems talk the trash. It will help us.
Quote:I can imagine the adds now,
"Is this whom you want giving a State Of The Union Address" " They are rapists" "I'm going to stick it to China" "I'd like to punch them in the face" or meeting world leaders?
It will not be boring like that dumbass Obama.
Quote:Nope, sorry global politics alone precludes him from holding office. His nasty rhetoric cannot occupy that office. He's damaged goods. Talk like his is good for cable radio and Jerry Springer, but giving a middle finger to an Mexicians and China and Muslims, nope. You can look forward to some very nasty times if that sicko gets elected. But he wont in any case.
He will mellow out when in office. Most of this is a show to get the libtard media to give him free air time.
So you admit is a show. See that right there is the fucking problem. This is NOT a game, this is real life, not just our country but the entire world is watching. You value a fucking wrecking ball as if you were watching a WWE death cage match. This isn't a show, this isn't about ratings, human lives are at stake, not just economically but civility wise, here and worldwide.
We don't need a fucking reality show star in office. We need a leader, a diplomat. Not a fear mongering asshole.
|