Trump versus Clinton?

[abaris]

Oh, please, scoob! For fuck's sake, do you think anyone takes you seriously posting Alex Jones shit?

[Losty]

Neither.

[scoobysnack]

I'm sure the Clintons are the only lying, scheming politicians.

No, really.

In order to get in the upper echelons, you have to play ball and be corrupt. Clinton is the most corrupt person running for president in the race. Trump has nothing on her. The Bush crime family is the same. Were talking drug running, selling weapons, corruption, bribery, etc.

This is bigger than Clinton though, there is a plan working itself out of taking over the power structure, and unfortunately it's pretty much already a done deal. The military is aware of this, along with some in law enforcement. For example if organized crime exists, wouldn't it make sense to take it over so you control it rather than someone else? The drug running is run in large part by the CIA/FBI etc since it provides monetary support for black ops that don't get approved by congress. It's way worse then I can post. We are in trouble.

[abaris]

And your source on that is .... I hesitate to ask .... Alex Jones?

[scoobysnack]

Oh, please, scoob! For fuck's sake, do you think anyone takes you seriously posting Alex Jones shit?

You do know there have been studies of showing someone the exact same article by attributing it to different sources to see how people interpret it. The same with putting someone in a suit vs blue jeans. This is not about Alex Jones, this is about Larry Nichols. Your problem is that you have built up psychological barriers preventing you from finding the truth based on your preconceived delusional notions. It's how you are kept in the controlled paradigm. I don't consider you are very well informed person when it comes to American politics or corruption, so you can say what you want. You don't have much to say except disbelief based on lack of knowledge.

[abaris]

So, come on. Present a different network than Info wars. Present the same story, and we can have a discussion. As long as it comes from Jones, Breitbart or something like that, we don't.

[scoobysnack]

So, come on. Present a different network than Info wars. Present the same story, and we can have a discussion. As long as it comes from Jones, Breitbart or something like that, we don't.

You must not realize that the news is controlled because it's essential to control the narrative. They need to play ball to keep their jobs. Certain subjects are off limits. So basically you are waiting for the controlled media to start telling you the truth right, or suspect they can't get away with lying or withholding the truth, right? I'm presenting information here because it's not reaching the population via the corporate media. It's like saying well unless the BBC reports it, it must not be true, without realizing the BBC controls which stories reach the public and which don't. This is why I'm asking how old you are, and where you live.

European media writing pro-US stories under CIA pressure - German journo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGqi-k213eE

[abaris]

As with so many things in life, I don't find any kinder words for you as calling you a conspiracy nut.

As opposed to many, I have a pretty solid grip on what the media is about, since after university, I went into journalism and PR. I'm very critical of my sources and the people behind them. Breitbart, Alex Jones and company, can't even be called sources. They're propaganda at it's purest. I've checked my share of their stories against numerous other sources. None of them stood up to closer scrutiny.

Jones is either a very clever businessman, feeding on nutters like you, or he's just as delusional and covered in tinfoil from head to toe. Oh, and look up his biography, if you find the time. Apart from being an obscure religious fanatic, he also has ties to neonazi organisations. The latter isn't entirely confirmed, but there's enough evidence to make a case. The former is by his own admission.

[scoobysnack]

As with so many things in life, I don't find any kinder words for you as calling you a conspiracy nut.

As opposed to many, I have a pretty solid grip on what the media is about, since after university, I went into journalism and PR. I'm very critical of my sources and the people behind them. Breitbart, Alex Jones and company, can't even be called sources. They're propaganda at it's purest. I've checked my share of their stories against numerous other sources. None of them stood up to closer scrutiny.

Jones is either a very clever businessman, feeding on nutters like you, or he's just as delusional and covered in tinfoil from head to toe. Oh, and look up his biography, if you find the time. Apart from being an obscure religious fanatic, he also has ties to neonazi organisations. The latter isn't entirely confirmed, but there's enough evidence to make a case. The former is by his own admission.

Yet you still don't address the message of the person interviewed, you address the interviewer. You seems to be a victim of the propaganda yourself. How is it that you have been trained to be misled? Neo-Nazi organizations hate him for not focusing on what they say is the Jewish control, so I don't know what you are trying to push. It seems you have been misled, or perhaps a useful idiot.

Anyway, your opinion is not valid, because you have never posted anything worth reading, it's just a tactic to get people off the trail. And you still will not answer the question on your nationality. Mainly because you repeat media talking points proves you are a shill.


At the same time I'll let you counter point with sources, but it always seems you don't have a counterpoint beyond disbelief because your trusted sources don't cover certain subjects. I'd like to have to start posting links, instead of opinions so I can check up on where you are getting your information from.

[abaris]

Yet you still don't address the message of the person interviewed, you address the interviewer.

Yes, and I won't adress the message, since the interviewer conveys everything there is to say on it's quality.