"Men are all pigs"

[Silver]

A woman who does not need a man ends up becoming a paradigm where the human race ceases to exist.

[Athene]

4) prove to men how you don't need them because you're so awesome and empowered.

This doesn't need proving.

Prove that it doesn't need proving! 

[ErGingerbreadMandude]

Could you elaborate,please?

It's been reiterated ad nauseum, and you're clearly not interested in contravening data. I've never had the habit of casting pearls before swine, and I'm not about to start on your account.

No its because you answered me with two Latin words, which I don't know the meaning to, are you somehow implying that your laws are sexist?

[ErGingerbreadMandude]

I think the problem with your culture is that you people always make a huge deal out of everything. When a girl gathers clothes to put in the washing machine you can't help but cry misogyny and blame the patriarchy for oppreshung women. When a girl gets hired at McChicken you can't help but write blogs about how women are now Out-McChickening men and men are no longer needed,haha.

pool...What the f*ck are you talking about? 

Does anyone know what the f*ck this guy is talking about? If so, a little help, please.
This seems a LOT like mindless babble to me.

This was the response to your post :

I like People that are independent. Proves to me that they aren't some lazy fuck living off of someone else,good for them.
But when they get on my face and yap yap yap about how strong,independent, empowered they are and demands love and respect because of that, I hate them on principle.

I was replying to this part of your post :

Ha ha...Women who aren't weak, dependent, and needy makes you want to punch a hole in their faces? Why, that's not dramatic at all, is it?
Perfectly f*ckin' reasonable!

You were straw Manning me that I don't like strong independent women because they are strong and independent.
My response was that I do like independent women, I also pointed out how I hate

But when they get on my face and yap yap yap about how strong,independent, empowered they are and demands love and respect because of that, I hate them on principle.

clear enough?

[ErGingerbreadMandude]

4) prove to men how you don't need them because you're so awesome and empowered.

This doesn't need proving.

Google mangina.

[ErGingerbreadMandude]

Okay, to all the hardcore feminists out there:

1) ban all men from working on women's day.
2) fill their gaps with women instead.
3) run everything down to the ground.
4) blame men for not helping.
3) being the super awesomeness that you are, turn around world economy in one day.
4) prove to men how you don't need them because you're so awesome and empowered.

WTF are you smoking, Pool?

How many feminists does it take to change a lightbulb?

Two . And there's nothing funny about it.

[Athene]

---

pool...What the f*ck are you talking about? 

Does anyone know what the f*ck this guy is talking about? If so, a little help, please.
This seems a LOT like mindless babble to me.

---

---

This was the response to your post :

I like People that are independent. Proves to me that they aren't some lazy fuck living off of someone else,good for them.
But when they get on my face and yap yap yap about how strong,independent, empowered they are and demands love and respect because of that, I hate them on principle.

I was replying to this part of your post :

---

---

Ha ha...Women who aren't weak, dependent, and needy makes you want to punch a hole in their faces? Why, that's not dramatic at all, is it?
Perfectly f*ckin' reasonable!

---

You were straw Manning me that I don't like strong independent women because they are strong and independent.
My response was that I do like independent women, I also pointed out how I hate 

But when they get on my face and yap yap yap about how strong,independent, empowered they are and demands love and respect because of that, I hate them on principle.

clear enough?

No. 

And you totally left out the laundry, the problem with the West, and the McChicken.
...If only I were joking.

Your arguments involve a great deal of babbling and disjointed hooey that's all over the place most of the time. You tend to lack focus and overall substance in general, save for the moments when your guard happens to slip and seething anger rears its ugly head.

It all comes together, then.

Otherwise; Low to mid nineties on the gobbledygook scale.

[Thumpalumpacus]

It's been reiterated ad nauseum, and you're clearly not interested in contravening data. I've never had the habit of casting pearls before swine, and I'm not about to start on your account.

No its because you answered me with two Latin words, which I don't know the meaning to, are you somehow implying that your laws are sexist?

Look up the words and garner your own understanding. Your education is not my responsibility.

You need to start thinking for yourself, and no matter your requests, I cannot and will not hold your hand through the process.

Spoonfeeding is for infants. Thimk, man -- think.

[ErGingerbreadMandude]

No its because you answered me with two Latin words, which I don't know the meaning to, are you somehow implying that your laws are sexist?

Look up the words and garner your own understanding. Your education is not my responsibility.

You need to start thinking for yourself, and no matter your requests, I cannot and will not hold your hand through the process.

Spoonfeeding is for infants. Thimk, man -- think.

Sure thump. :-)
Although your argument is utter bullshit, do you know why though?
Here's the reason:
"Nink pranth Ada chekka, nanam ilata pwotta, nink onum oru myrm ariyila."

Oh, what was that? You don't know what it means? Well, it's not my job to spoon feed information to you thump. You have Google, do lots of searching and make a research paper, maybe you'll get it. Good luck. ;-)

[The Valkyrie]

WTF are you smoking, Pool?

How many feminists does it take to change a lightbulb?

Two . And there's nothing funny about it.

One.

Because feminists don't need to lean on a male to do things for them.