True. Most most non-believers have fundamentalists in mind. At the same time, most Roman Catholic theologians would (I think) agree with me and they are hardly a fringe denomination. You could say that RC is the premier Christian group.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 15, 2024, 3:14 am
Thread Rating:
|
Why the bible ISN'T evidence.
|
 Quote:we don't have you or Swedenborgianism in mind. Isn't that Swedenborgasm?  (April 4, 2016 at 9:40 pm)ChadWooters Wrote: True. Most most non-believers have fundamentalists in mind. At the same time, most Roman Catholic theologians would (I think) agree with me and they are hardly a fringe denomination. You could say that RC is the premier Christian group. I once heard a Catholic Priest start an epiphany (Visit of the Magi) homily by saying "You know there were no wise men, right? No visit from gift-bearing Kings or prophets or whatever they were supposed to have been." He then launched into a great explanation of how the writer of Matthew wanted to use this image to show divinity. I wanted to hug him. My fundamentalist parents would have been outraged at that statement. Yes, the Catholics are not nearly as literal-minded.
"The family that prays together...is brainwashing their children."- Albert Einstein
But the bible mentions people and places that existed at the time of writing. How could that be if it wasn't accurate?
On another note, I'm going to New York next year to meet Spider-Man Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni: "You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???" |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
