Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: October 31, 2026, 2:12 pm
Thread Rating:
|
Not this shit again, Hitchens deathbed "conversion".
|
|
RE: Not this shit again, Hitchens deathbed "conversion".
April 19, 2016 at 10:19 am
(This post was last modified: April 19, 2016 at 10:22 am by robvalue.)
What a motherfucker.
I don't even understand what their point is. Mentally deteriorated people sometimes start believing our bullshit, so you should too? More back patting. This isn't going to convince anyone with a functioning brain call of anything. How disgusting. Looking closesly: it doesn't even say he converted, just that he "considered it". I call bullshit too. If he really said any of that, he wasn't in his right mind. But the whole thing sounds made up. (April 19, 2016 at 10:19 am)robvalue Wrote: What a motherfucker. Anthony Flew is another case Christians use. That is an even bigger case and he as well was in mental decline at the time of his claimed conversion. What is also utter bullshit is the so what? This religious narcissism also assumes on a planet of 7 billion that there is only one religion. This is simply hearsay and especially it has nothing to do with science in any case. It is simply another bullshit marketing tactic and exploitation of a dead man.
Even if the story were true, it's just an example of people doing irrational things when in an irrational mindset. Like some testimony about a drug addict who was offered a hand up, and converted to the religion of the guy that was trying to help them. Or the idea that there are no atheists in foxholes. Fear can make you do some crazy things. If someone normally has to be in a vulnerable state to believe what you're saying, then what you're saying isn't very believable.
Indeed. Apologetics is based on dishonesty.
(April 19, 2016 at 10:58 am)robvalue Wrote: Indeed. Apologetics is based on dishonesty. Yep, it is the difference between a historian who merely reports neutrally, and the apologist who is trying to get you to buy an old rusted out used car. Put some bondo on it, slap a fresh coat of paint on it, wax it, but don't bother telling them the transmission is shot.
They find a handful of supposed 'deathbed conversions' that they can't provide verification of and it's very validating for them. Perhaps because over the last 7 years, the USA added about 18-1900 new atheists a day, while Christians dropped by about 7,500 a day over the same period. They need to count every win they can get, even if they have to make them up.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.
(April 19, 2016 at 11:06 am)Mister Agenda Wrote: They find a handful of supposed 'deathbed conversions' that they can't provide verification of and it's very validating for them. Perhaps because over the last 7 years, the USA added about 18-1900 new atheists a day, while Christians dropped by about 7,500 a day over the same period. They need to count every win they can get, even if they have to make them up. Legally they have the right to try, I'd ask them why though? I doubt though that Hitchen's family would have a case to sue, but still a dick move by this author in any case. We no longer value claims of flat earth, nor do we value claims of Thor and we live fine without believing in Egyptian polytheism? Humans should stop thinking it is so horrible to give up on old and bad claims. Giving up on bad claims is how humans learn and progress. If our species never questioned social norms, our species never would have left the caves.
As usual, Robert Green Ingersoll noted the tendency over a century ago. Nothing ever changes with religitards.
Quote:Orthodox Christians have the habit of claiming all great men, all men who have held important positions, men of reputation, men of wealth. As soon as the funeral is over clergymen begin to relate imaginary conversations with the deceased, and in a very little while the great man is changed to a Christian -- possibly to a saint. (April 19, 2016 at 11:49 am)Minimalist Wrote: As usual, Robert Green Ingersoll noted the tendency over a century ago. Nothing ever changes with religitards. Well you can't have a bible verse claiming nonbelievers never do anything good, while having men in power doing good despite not being religious. You can't always convert them by force, so you have to fall back on claiming they converted right before death when they're no longer around to dispute it. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



