Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: The nature of evidence
May 2, 2016 at 8:00 am
(This post was last modified: May 2, 2016 at 8:02 am by robvalue.)
How would I know this God thing from Adam? How would you distinguish it from an arbitrarily powerful non God?
You're just giving it fancy names, titles and achievements. You're not telling me anything about what it is.
You can't present evidence for something so nebulous, when we have no clue what you're even talking about.
Posts: 65
Threads: 4
Joined: April 29, 2016
Reputation:
0
RE: The nature of evidence
May 2, 2016 at 8:06 am
(This post was last modified: May 2, 2016 at 8:07 am by Wryetui.)
(May 2, 2016 at 6:24 am)Mudhammam Wrote: Why has "evidence" for God only become an ambiguous concept since people began realizing that the claims made in the Judeo-Christian literature lack credibility and contradict everything we know about Nature?
Why they contradict everything we know about nature? In order for me to believe you, you cannot just make an empty statement.
I have told you Who God is, God is the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. God is the creator of the universe.
"Let us commit ourselves and one another and our whole life to Christ, our God"
- Divine Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom
Posts: 20476
Threads: 447
Joined: June 16, 2014
Reputation:
111
RE: The nature of evidence
May 2, 2016 at 8:20 am
(This post was last modified: May 2, 2016 at 8:22 am by ignoramus.)
Alex.
Is this car expensive to run?
Do you really think I'm going to trust a German with fuel efficiency figures!?
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.
Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: The nature of evidence
May 2, 2016 at 8:25 am
So...
Is this for real or a wind up? What do we reckon?
Posts: 9915
Threads: 53
Joined: November 27, 2015
Reputation:
92
The nature of evidence
May 2, 2016 at 8:26 am
(May 2, 2016 at 7:55 am)downbeatplumb Wrote: (May 2, 2016 at 6:00 am)Wryetui Wrote: What do you mean I don't know Who God is? God is the Creator of the universe. God is the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit, three hypostases sharing the same ousia.
I do not know what god is and those things you just wrote are no help. Creator of the universe: How? what technique did it use? where did it get the stuff etc etc? what made it suddenly want to create a universe,? what is this god thing made of and what does it look like? none of these basic things are in anyway mentioned in your extremely vague "explanation". I have no idea what you mean by the other stuff you said. you may as well as written the flibble, the snort and bibbidy flimp, they are not explanations of anything.
Somewhere, Wooters is touching himself.
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Posts: 20476
Threads: 447
Joined: June 16, 2014
Reputation:
111
RE: The nature of evidence
May 2, 2016 at 8:29 am
Guys. Don't underestimate the predictability of a passionate theist.
He may be genuine.
After all, how many ways can you try to explain one book?
It's not exactly the game of thrones saga!
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.
Posts: 9915
Threads: 53
Joined: November 27, 2015
Reputation:
92
The nature of evidence
May 2, 2016 at 8:33 am
(This post was last modified: May 2, 2016 at 8:33 am by LadyForCamus.)
(May 2, 2016 at 8:25 am)robvalue Wrote: So...
Is this for real or a wind up? What do we reckon?
It's so hard to tell anymore. It's funny how the patterns of theistic argumentation become more and more predictable over time. Here we have: "You're ignorant if you expect the same evidence for God that you would (quite reasonably) expect for every single thing in every other facet of your existence, because...God is super special + philosophy."
*yawn*
Rob, I think you should dust off that great video you did about claims and evidence. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence..ect. I think it's quite fitting here.
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Posts: 5399
Threads: 256
Joined: December 1, 2013
Reputation:
60
RE: The nature of evidence
May 2, 2016 at 8:33 am
(This post was last modified: May 2, 2016 at 8:34 am by Mudhammam.)
(May 2, 2016 at 8:06 am)Wryetui Wrote: Why they contradict everything we know about nature? In order for me to believe you, you cannot just make an empty statement. By "everything we know about nature," I mean, we have a general and even detailed understanding of physics to know that many of the miracles in the Bible, if they actually occurred, would be a violation of the natural order that is both well documented and available to anyone for subsequent observation.
Furthermore, there is no shortage of examples involving human beings making incredible, unbelievable claims, and countless others who are willing to believe them. As these often appeal to mutually exclusive occult powers, they can't all be true. As some are quite clearly false, and not a single one in the Bible is able to distinguish itself as categorically superior in rationale or evidence as the most fanciful, it's more likely that they all share a similar, less extravagant, and less "mysterious" explanation: people are ignorant of true causes, or dishonest.
He who loves God cannot endeavour that God should love him in return - Baruch Spinoza
Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: The nature of evidence
May 2, 2016 at 8:36 am
(May 2, 2016 at 8:33 am)LadyForCamus Wrote: (May 2, 2016 at 8:25 am)robvalue Wrote: So...
Is this for real or a wind up? What do we reckon?
It's so hard to tell anymore. It's funny how the patterns of theistic argumentation become more and more predictable over time. Here we have: "You're ignorant if you expect the same evidence for God that you would (quite reasonably) expect for every single thing in every other facet of your existence, because...God is super special + philosophy."
*yawn*
Rob, I think you should dust off that great video you did about claims and evidence. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence..ect. I think it's quite fitting here.
Thank you Yes, good idea!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cX7mdUh9yUE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lOrP9nb-yrk
Posts: 13901
Threads: 263
Joined: January 11, 2009
Reputation:
82
RE: The nature of evidence
May 2, 2016 at 12:28 pm
(May 2, 2016 at 8:06 am)Wryetui Wrote: I have told you Who God is, God is the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. God is the creator of the universe.
I don't know what you mean by this, explain fully.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
|