Posts: 6006
Threads: 253
Joined: January 2, 2013
Reputation:
30
RE: Monogamous or not.
June 27, 2016 at 7:38 am
(This post was last modified: June 27, 2016 at 8:02 am by paulpablo.)
(June 27, 2016 at 7:36 am)MJ the Skeptical Wrote: (June 9, 2016 at 8:13 am)paulpablo Wrote: I find it easy to find women who are non monogamous. I said in my previous post this is a subjective experience. Although if you have an internet connection and you can't find non monogamous women while trying very hard I'd say you must be really really bad at using the internet in general.
Women in other species aren't called women, you're thinking of females. It depends upon the breeding strategy of the species as to whether or not they choose dependable fathers, there's something called r/K selection theory, some people apply this theory to different breeding patterns of humans.
Yes if a guy goes around saying they're non monogamist they will be repellent for women I imagine. But it was very rare for me to talk about monogamy or non monogamy with any girl I had sex with when I was living a very non monogamous lifestyle. Sex would occur before any deep conversation about ethics, morality or lifestyle choices were mentioned.
So yes the words "I'm non monogamous" are possibly more repellent to a woman than the words "I'm monogamous" But being non monogamous means, purely by definition, that you are with more than one woman in a short period of time. Being monogamous means that you're with one woman over a significant amount of time in a relationship. And you're repelling, or at least not actively trying to attract any other women, unlike the person who is non monogamous who by definition has attracted at least two women at the same time.
So fucking dumb and generalized...there are plenty of factors why it's hard to find a minority group which has nothing to do "not being able to use the internet" you condescending cunt.
Like; Location, Specific desires, Your gender, Your age, Your demeanor, Your choices etc.
Yeah, in your anecdotal subjective experience it was easy, good for you romeo, you don't get to generalize people who can't because it was "easy" for you, that's fucking stupid. You even admit if people go around saying they don't fall under the strict monogamous label it's not going to be easy to find like minded people, as is such the case on the internet. Especially if you are a guy, who has to try much harder than a woman does to find what he wants. And yet again you are just dead fucking wrong, just because you are non-monogamous does not mean you are always around tons of vaginas. You could just not be into relationships which would disqualify you from monogamy as well.
You are a piece of shit on the end of my shoe, lick yourself off my shoe, go on lick it.
I didn't say there wasn't many reasons why it's difficult to find a minority group. I said if you have an Internet connection and you can't find non monogamous women you must be bad at using the Internet you stupid sack of cat shit.
You smell like a donkey's ball sack and I can smell you from here. You're the one who is generalising by saying that non monogamy results in being unattractive to women, I didn't generalise, I told my personal experience and I presented it as my personal experience, I then made what I think is a logical statement in that if you are non monogamous then you're attracting at least two women during a short period of time.
And I didn't say if you're non monogamous you will be around tons of vagina, I said if you're non monogamous you will be around at least 2 vaginas in a short period of time
You massive fat twat
Are you ready for the fire? We are firemen. WE ARE FIREMEN! The heat doesn’t bother us. We live in the heat. We train in the heat. It tells us that we’re ready, we’re at home, we’re where we’re supposed to be. Flames don’t intimidate us. What do we do? We control the flame. We control them. We move the flames where we want to. And then we extinguish them.
Impersonation is treason.
Posts: 5690
Threads: 8
Joined: April 3, 2014
Reputation:
68
RE: Monogamous or not.
June 27, 2016 at 7:52 am
I'll hold your jackets gentlemen.
Each of you choose a pistol and walk away from me at ten paces.
Posts: 1495
Threads: 12
Joined: January 18, 2016
Reputation:
18
RE: Monogamous or not.
June 27, 2016 at 7:56 am
I always thought monogamy was a type of wood.
Posts: 5690
Threads: 8
Joined: April 3, 2014
Reputation:
68
RE: Monogamous or not.
June 27, 2016 at 7:59 am
Nice one. Made me laugh. :-)
Posts: 977
Threads: 11
Joined: July 17, 2015
Reputation:
9
RE: Monogamous or not.
June 27, 2016 at 8:05 am
(June 27, 2016 at 7:38 am)paulpablo Wrote: (June 27, 2016 at 7:36 am)MJ the Skeptical Wrote: So fucking dumb and generalized...there are plenty of factors why it's hard to find a minority group which has nothing to do "not being able to use the internet" you condescending cunt.
Like; Location, Specific desires, Your gender, Your age, Your demeanor, Your choices etc.
Yeah, in your anecdotal subjective experience it was easy, good for you romeo, you don't get to generalize people who can't because it was "easy" for you, that's fucking stupid. You even admit if people go around saying they don't fall under the strict monogamous label it's not going to be easy to find like minded people, as is such the case on the internet. Especially if you are a guy, who has to try much harder than a woman does to find what he wants. And yet again you are just dead fucking wrong, just because you are non-monogamous does not mean you are always around tons of vaginas. You could just not be into relationships which would disqualify you from monogamy as well.
You are a piece of shit on the end of my shoe, lick yourself off my shoe, go on lick it.
I didn't say there wasn't many reasons why it's difficult to find a minority group. I said if you have an Internet connection and you can't find non monogamous women you must be bad at using the Internet you stupid sack of cat shit.
You smell like a donkey's ball sack and I can smell you from here. You're the one who is generalising by saying that non monogamy results in being unattractive to women, I didn't generalise, I told my personal experience and I presented it as my personal experience, I then made what I think is a logical statement in that if you are non monogamous then you're attracting at least two women during a short period of time.
And I didn't say if you're non monogamous you will be around tons of vagina, I said if you're non monogamous you will be around at least 2 vaginas in a short period of time
You massive fat twat
Just to chime in here on one point...... I got married a year ago, I can tell you, it most certainly does NOT make you less attractive to women, on the contrary.
You may refer to me as "Oh High One."
Posts: 726
Threads: 15
Joined: February 18, 2014
Reputation:
17
RE: Monogamous or not.
June 27, 2016 at 8:06 am
(This post was last modified: June 27, 2016 at 8:07 am by MJ the Skeptical.)
(June 27, 2016 at 7:38 am)paulpablo Wrote: (June 27, 2016 at 7:36 am)MJ the Skeptical Wrote: So fucking dumb and generalized...there are plenty of factors why it's hard to find a minority group which has nothing to do "not being able to use the internet" you condescending cunt.
Like; Location, Specific desires, Your gender, Your age, Your demeanor, Your choices etc.
Yeah, in your anecdotal subjective experience it was easy, good for you romeo, you don't get to generalize people who can't because it was "easy" for you, that's fucking stupid. You even admit if people go around saying they don't fall under the strict monogamous label it's not going to be easy to find like minded people, as is such the case on the internet. Especially if you are a guy, who has to try much harder than a woman does to find what he wants. And yet again you are just dead fucking wrong, just because you are non-monogamous does not mean you are always around tons of vaginas. You could just not be into relationships which would disqualify you from monogamy as well.
You are a piece of shit on the end of my shoe, lick yourself off my shoe, go on lick it.
I didn't say there wasn't many reasons why it's difficult to find a minority group. I said if you have an Internet connection and you can't find non monogamous women you must be bad at using the Internet you stupid sack of cat shit.
You smell like a donkey's ball sack and I can smell you from here. You're the one who is generalising by saying that non monogamy results in being unattractive to women, I didn't generalise, I told my personal experience and I presented it as my personal experience, I then made what I think is a logical statement in that if you are non monogamous then you're attracting at least two women during a short period of time.
You massive fat twat
1) Yes you did say it was easy if you have the internet, you said it wasn't hard to find non-monogamous people if you had that, which is beyond retarded and generalized.
2) Yes I did say non-monogamy is unattractive to most women, even not being into relationships, which is also non-monogamy, retard x2.
3) You generalized all people who couldn't find what they want as being bad at using the internet when there are more factors there, retard x3.
4) No, you don't have to be in the proximity of two vaginas to be non-monogamous, because like I said you autistic empty vessel, that you could not be into relationships which would also put you in the non-monogamy category.
Oh, if only I knew how to use the internet, I could find what I want in the middle of nowhere huh? Did you miss all of the reasons I gave? I guess so. Just an intellectually bankrupt tool.
If the hypothetical idea of an afterlife means more to you than the objectively true reality we all share, then you deserve no respect.
Posts: 9147
Threads: 83
Joined: May 22, 2013
Reputation:
46
RE: Monogamous or not.
June 27, 2016 at 8:07 am
I fucking hate being monogamous. Seriously. . . I have, like, chances and stuff. Hot secretary, etc. etc. I want to do it SO fucking bad.
But I never want to have that day where I look at my wife's face and see that her life has been shattered. I'd die not to have to see that face, and I think no extramarital sex is slightly less bad than dying, so I should be able to do that to.
But fuck the universe for making me have to make that choice.
Posts: 726
Threads: 15
Joined: February 18, 2014
Reputation:
17
RE: Monogamous or not.
June 27, 2016 at 8:09 am
(June 27, 2016 at 8:05 am)SofaKingHigh Wrote: (June 27, 2016 at 7:38 am)paulpablo Wrote: You are a piece of shit on the end of my shoe, lick yourself off my shoe, go on lick it.
I didn't say there wasn't many reasons why it's difficult to find a minority group. I said if you have an Internet connection and you can't find non monogamous women you must be bad at using the Internet you stupid sack of cat shit.
You smell like a donkey's ball sack and I can smell you from here. You're the one who is generalising by saying that non monogamy results in being unattractive to women, I didn't generalise, I told my personal experience and I presented it as my personal experience, I then made what I think is a logical statement in that if you are non monogamous then you're attracting at least two women during a short period of time.
And I didn't say if you're non monogamous you will be around tons of vagina, I said if you're non monogamous you will be around at least 2 vaginas in a short period of time
You massive fat twat
Just to chime in here on one point...... I got married a year ago, I can tell you, it most certainly does NOT make you less attractive to women, on the contrary.
One subjective experience, what are we supposed to gleam from this? There are more factors involved than you just being married...
Perhaps you're attractive, well off financially, a good dad, a good provider, etc. I get what you're saying that some women like forbidden fruit but it's the exception, not the rule.
If the hypothetical idea of an afterlife means more to you than the objectively true reality we all share, then you deserve no respect.
Posts: 9147
Threads: 83
Joined: May 22, 2013
Reputation:
46
RE: Monogamous or not.
June 27, 2016 at 8:10 am
(This post was last modified: June 27, 2016 at 8:13 am by bennyboy.)
(June 27, 2016 at 8:05 am)SofaKingHigh Wrote: Just to chime in here on one point...... I got married a year ago, I can tell you, it most certainly does NOT make you less attractive to women, on the contrary. No doubt. Nothing validates a woman more than proving she is "sexy enough" to steal what belongs to someone else. The thing is: we've spent so much energy invalidating women-- under-rating them, imposing unrealistic (and mostly pointless) standards on their appearance, and generally smashing their egoes from day one. The result is a strong instinct to seek validation, and that means having sex just to prove you have the power to make it happen.
Posts: 977
Threads: 11
Joined: July 17, 2015
Reputation:
9
RE: Monogamous or not.
June 27, 2016 at 8:10 am
(June 27, 2016 at 8:09 am)MJ the Skeptical Wrote: (June 27, 2016 at 8:05 am)SofaKingHigh Wrote: Just to chime in here on one point...... I got married a year ago, I can tell you, it most certainly does NOT make you less attractive to women, on the contrary.
One subjective experience, what are we supposed to gleam from this? There are more factors involved than you just being married...
Perhaps you're attractive, well off financially, a good dad, a good provider, etc. I get what you're saying that some women like forbidden fruit but it's the exception, not the rule.
Sorry, just not true. Before getting married I got warned by my lovely wife, my mother and married friends that this would be the case, I didn't believe it, I do now.
You may refer to me as "Oh High One."
|