Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 23, 2024, 5:53 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
UK to leave EU
RE: UK to leave EU
(June 25, 2016 at 6:44 pm)Bella Morte Wrote: Who said anything about no immigrants? Immigrants are beneficial, it's mass immigration that a lot of people are against.

I agree that they should not say mass.  Fucking catholick pervs.
Reply
RE: UK to leave EU
Hmmm.....

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/06/...ndum-reru/


Quote:Petition for EU referendum re-run approaches 3 million as David Lammy MP calls for parliament to block Brexit

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/06/...rom-the-e/

Quote:Nigel Farage has reacted with fury after Vote Leave said it would exclude him from a cross-party committee which will negotiate Britain’s exit from the European Union.


Interesting times.
Reply
RE: UK to leave EU
I'll enjoy watching the riots that will ensue if they block the vote.
Reply
RE: UK to leave EU
This just in, in an interview Hon. Julie Bishop MP said she has spoken to Philip Hammond MP, and said quite matter-of-fact that she has a "deeper briefing lined up for this evening to discuss the ramifications for Britain. There are conflicting messages as to whether the period of withdrawal we be the whole 2 years that is allowed under the European Union treaty or whether the European Union countries will want the exit to occur more quickly." Spears then asked "some of the foreign ministers in Europe are pushing for that aren't they?" She responded "I understand that to be the case. They are obviously seeking to put stability back into the European Union as soon as possible and that's in (I think) everybody's interest. There's a great deal of volatility at present, a great deal of uncertainty, ..."

From the sound of it, there is a push for clarity from UK for a swifter withdrawal process, commentators have been saying that the UK could wait several months before invoking Article 50, and then wait two years to fully withdraw from the EU - we'll have to wait and see, but it does appear that once the Article is invoked the withdrawal period is expected (politically) to be somewhat smoother than that.
For Religion & Health see:[/b][/size] Williams & Sternthal. (2007). Spirituality, religion and health: Evidence and research directions. Med. J. Aust., 186(10), S47-S50. -LINK

The WIN/Gallup End of Year Survey 2013 found the US was perceived to be the greatest threat to world peace by a huge margin, with 24% of respondents fearful of the US followed by: 8% for Pakistan, and 6% for China. This was followed by 5% each for: Afghanistan, Iran, Israel, North Korea. -LINK


"That's disgusting. There were clean athletes out there that have had their whole careers ruined by people like Lance Armstrong who just bended thoughts to fit their circumstances. He didn't look up cheating because he wanted to stop, he wanted to justify what he was doing and to keep that continuing on." - Nicole Cooke
Reply
RE: UK to leave EU
I'm hoping we invoke the article as soon as possible.
Reply
RE: UK to leave EU
(June 25, 2016 at 11:19 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Hmmm.....

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/06/...ndum-reru/

Quote:Petition for EU referendum re-run approaches 3 million as David Lammy MP calls for parliament to block Brexit

The leader of the government AND the leader of the opposition in the UK both backed "Remain". Imagine how many more people would have voted "Leave" if the Party leaders were actively advocating Leave instead? Once Cameron is out, the new PM will be pro-Leave, so any future plebiscite or referendum would only increase the number for the "Leave" side. For example, let's imagine in the USA there is a referendum on gun control - a referendum to change the Second Amendment. Firstly, the result of such a referendum would be legally binding anyway, so a do-over would not be an option. But let's imagine that the President of the day, his party and the opposition party take the stance that "it should not change" and people voted to change it 52% - 48%. The President resigns, a pro gun-reform President is sworn-in, and meanwhile the opposition leadership changes as well. There is a partition for a do-over referendum from angry people spurred on by the gun lobbyists, claiming that "many people simply said 'Change' as a protest vote". What would the future referendum look like if the first one had 52% support when the leaders actively campaigned against change - and now the leaders are pro-change?
For Religion & Health see:[/b][/size] Williams & Sternthal. (2007). Spirituality, religion and health: Evidence and research directions. Med. J. Aust., 186(10), S47-S50. -LINK

The WIN/Gallup End of Year Survey 2013 found the US was perceived to be the greatest threat to world peace by a huge margin, with 24% of respondents fearful of the US followed by: 8% for Pakistan, and 6% for China. This was followed by 5% each for: Afghanistan, Iran, Israel, North Korea. -LINK


"That's disgusting. There were clean athletes out there that have had their whole careers ruined by people like Lance Armstrong who just bended thoughts to fit their circumstances. He didn't look up cheating because he wanted to stop, he wanted to justify what he was doing and to keep that continuing on." - Nicole Cooke
Reply
RE: UK to leave EU
(June 25, 2016 at 10:17 pm)Napoléon Wrote: [...]What's worse. The leave campaigners exaggerating the amount of money we do actually send to the EU (which is still a lot). Or the remain campaigners using the most powerful man in the world to lie to voters. [...]

I don't know what's "worse". But I know that believing the former was way more stupid, because information to the contrary was immediately available to anyone.
"The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one." - George Bernard Shaw
Reply
RE: UK to leave EU
(June 25, 2016 at 11:04 pm)Tiberius Wrote: The special relationship had nothing to do with trade. Its a political and military ally.

Obama's own spokesperson said he wasn't going back on what he said. The US will negotiate with the EU before the UK, because the EU has more economic power.
Trump might have a different agenda.
Reply
RE: UK to leave EU
Fortunately that supercilious twat will be an irrelevancy by November 10.
Reply
RE: UK to leave EU
(June 25, 2016 at 9:29 pm)Bella Morte Wrote:
(June 25, 2016 at 9:27 pm)Homeless Nutter Wrote: Vapers gonna vape...

Nah.

Actually it's true by definition. Therefore all Brexiters love Jesus. The logic is plain.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Let's talk Parental Leave Cecelia 10 1331 October 17, 2021 at 8:25 am
Last Post: Spongebob
  Scotland could leave the UK, and join Canada instead, says author Isis 21 8186 April 8, 2017 at 12:33 pm
Last Post: brewer
  Merkel will pay migrants to leave Germany account_inactive 26 5427 February 12, 2017 at 3:28 am
Last Post: account_inactive
  Hey Tim. Leave The God Shit to the Repulbicunts Minimalist 12 2783 October 4, 2016 at 5:15 pm
Last Post: Aegon
  EU: Should the UK Leave or Stay? Napoléon 255 29322 May 4, 2016 at 4:00 am
Last Post: Marsellus Wallace
  Ben Carson Threatens to Leave GOP Minimalist 11 2667 December 11, 2015 at 5:15 pm
Last Post: Chad32
  Far-right rioters leave trail of destruction in Polish capital kılıç_mehmet 39 9875 November 20, 2013 at 9:39 am
Last Post: EgoRaptor
  French troops to leave Afghanistan Something completely different 23 8854 November 20, 2012 at 6:40 pm
Last Post: Brakeman



Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)