Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: October 31, 2026, 3:45 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
[split] Peanut Gallery Commentary-and the drama over the nudity thread continues
#1
[split] Peanut Gallery Commentary-and the drama over the nudity thread continues
Reply
#2
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
The thread wasn't a troll. It was provocative, to be sure -- it provoked many responses. But it grew because the innate defensiveness of ingrained attitudes overrode the simple idea of reading what was written.

If you actually want to discuss the issue rather than dismiss it with a joke, have at it. Heatheness has a good point there, and waving it away with ridicule doesn't change that fact.

Reply
#3
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
(July 3, 2016 at 6:43 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: The thread wasn't a troll. It was provocative, to be sure -- it provoked many responses. But it grew because the innate defensiveness of ingrained attitudes overrode the simple idea of reading what was written.

If you actually want to discuss the issue rather than dismiss it with a joke, have at it. Heatheness has a good point there, and waving it away with ridicule doesn't change that fact.

Thanks Mr. Spinmeister for telling us what to think about what was written and who was right or wrong. What would we do without you?
[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg?rlkey=x1nmxbwrp...pouidnfvtl]
Reply
#4
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
Heatheness' point was that she thought being unfair to two genders was preferable to being unfair to one gender. Because she mistook sameness for fairness. But it wasn't spelled out like that and lots of ridiculous accusations were thrown at the staff.
Reply
#5
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
(July 3, 2016 at 6:50 am)Jörmungandr Wrote:
(July 3, 2016 at 6:43 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: The thread wasn't a troll. It was provocative, to be sure -- it provoked many responses. But it grew because the innate defensiveness of ingrained attitudes overrode the simple idea of reading what was written.

If you actually want to discuss the issue rather than dismiss it with a joke, have at it. Heatheness has a good point there, and waving it away with ridicule doesn't change that fact.

Thanks Mr. Spinmeister for telling us what to think about what was written and who was right or wrong. What would we do without you?

Fuck right off. You're entitled to your own opinion, of course, but you're not entitled to belittle mine unless you want a reply like this.

You can listen to me or the others or yourself, but don't think you can talk down to me without a little pushback.

You actually want to discuss the issue? Great. You want to be snide? I can do that, too ...

If you're feeling lucky you'd best not refuse / the rules of the game are your own, win or lose

Throw out your gold teeth and see how they roll ...

Reply
#6
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
Had a good point that no-one else thought was worth mentioning ever until now...
Where would we be without her wisdom!
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.
Reply
#7
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
(July 3, 2016 at 6:57 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:
(July 3, 2016 at 6:50 am)Jörmungandr Wrote: Thanks Mr. Spinmeister for telling us what to think about what was written and who was right or wrong.  What would we do without you?

Fuck right off. You're entitled to your own opinion, of course, but you're not entitled to belittle mine unless you want a reply like this.

You can listen to me or the others or yourself, but don't think you can talk down to me without a little pushback.

Fuck you, too, you self-important gob.
[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg?rlkey=x1nmxbwrp...pouidnfvtl]
Reply
#8
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
I guess this is over the nudity/sexist thread. I never even looked at it before, since this obviously isn't the place and I waved it away as some kind of baiting right from the get go.
[Image: Bumper+Sticker+-+Asheville+-+Praise+Dog3.JPG]
Reply
#9
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
You are correct on both scores.
Reply
#10
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
It was out and out victim playing by the OP.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like. Whateverist 4493 1511471 March 31, 2021 at 5:55 am
Last Post: The Valkyrie
  Nudity, Is It Sexist In This Forum? Heatheness 702 183447 July 7, 2016 at 2:08 am
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  My Cat Climbed All Over My Laptop rexbeccarox 40 10920 March 11, 2016 at 1:40 pm
Last Post: Joods
  [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action Shell B 94 63184 June 2, 2012 at 1:27 pm
Last Post: kılıç_mehmet
  [split] Quoting Full Articles Violet 8 5316 April 27, 2010 at 11:34 am
Last Post: Tiberius



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)