Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 15, 2024, 9:00 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
[split] Peanut Gallery Commentary-and the drama over the nudity thread continues
#51
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
(July 4, 2016 at 1:26 am)Nymphadora Wrote: I just wish we could move past the whole thing.

Well, I'm invading Texas and opening "death camps" in a few weeks.

Then I'm burning down Ken Ham.

Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni:

"You did WHAT?  With WHO?  WHERE???"
Reply
#52
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
Hey, you can't make death threats against important public figures...

Never mind.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
#53
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
(July 4, 2016 at 1:32 am)robvalue Wrote: Hey, you can't make death threats against important public figures...

Never mind.


Who said kill?

I only mentioned burning down...

Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni:

"You did WHAT?  With WHO?  WHERE???"
Reply
#54
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
(July 4, 2016 at 1:26 am)Nymphadora Wrote: I just wish we could move past the whole thing.

(July 4, 2016 at 1:27 am)robvalue Wrote: I would enjoy that very much.

Yep. The shame is that the crows keep cawing about it.

Reply
#55
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
[Image: 16v4p8.jpg]


hehe
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.
Reply
#56
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
Whateverist the White Wrote:I assume there would have been a rupture between those who think the right ideals are all that should matter and those who think no one (Tiberius) should have to lose money to maintain a non-sexist policy regarding nudity and pornography.

It wasn't the right ideals either. Reducing the freedoms of one group so both groups can be equally unfairly limited makes no sense. As I said before, let's say hypothetically there was a school where only girls were being bullied and for sake of argument let's say there's no way to reduce the bullying even remotely. Encouraging bullies to bully the boys too so both sexes could be bullied equally would not be a solution.
Reply
#57
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
Isn't this logic the exact same logic which forces Muslim women in some countries to cover up their faces in public?

Yes it is a man's world. It sucks and it's unfair on so many levels.

As a species, we are still very primitive in that respect.

Religion has a lot to answer for also in moulding cultures.

Only because fools believe the holy books to be inerrant.

Bullshit. It was written by men, for men. Another reason why religion is holding back humanity.
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.
Reply
#58
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
Except, she wasn't calling for bullying, but solidarity.

Reply
#59
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
(July 4, 2016 at 3:12 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: Except, she wasn't calling for bullying, but solidarity.

Awesome, and I was happy to show solidarity by censoring any posting of male nipples I had on my agenda - which was none. However, that did not seem to be what the ask was.

The ask seemed to be that the staff enforce that on everyone, which is an entirely different kettle of fish.
Reply
#60
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
It was an analogy. Obviously it's not about bullying but that's irrelevant to the analogy.

Limiting freedoms is unfair.
Bullying is unfair.
Limiting the freedoms of both sexes is twice as unfair as limiting the freedoms of one sex.
Bullying both sexes is twice as unfair as bullying one sex.

Obviously it's not about bullying, the point is both limiting freedoms and bullying is an example of unfair treatment and being unfair to everyone is not fair. It's unfair to everyone.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like. Whateverist 4493 762455 March 31, 2021 at 5:55 am
Last Post: The Valkyrie
  Nudity, Is It Sexist In This Forum? Heatheness 702 76333 July 7, 2016 at 2:08 am
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action Shell B 94 46697 June 2, 2012 at 1:27 pm
Last Post: kılıç_mehmet
  [split] Quoting Full Articles Violet 8 4056 April 27, 2010 at 11:34 am
Last Post: Tiberius



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)