Ken Ham's Ark Debunked in One Picture

[LivingNumbers6.626]

But you don't get it, the arc was after the dinosaurs! Can't you see? Forget all the other facts to consider like water and food resources along with probable extinction due to an imbalance in predator vs prey. But dinosaurs didn't go on the arc, silly!

[Silver]

Don't forget incest. That was on the ark, too.

[Minimalist]

No, no.  Dinosaurs were fucking xtians!

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

Genesis 7:2 'Of every clean beast thou shalt take to thee seven and seven, each with his mate; and of the beasts that are not clean two [and two], each with his mate;'.

Thus, Noah could not have taken baby dinos, since sexually immature organisms cannot have a mate. Eggs are RIGHT OUT.

So vorlon got it... gonna need a WAY bigger boat.

Boru

[Aoi Magi]

They made 'em tiny with magic, duh!!!

[ignoramus]

The Ark was a tardis!
Its volumetric efficiency changed as needed!

(You have to fight bullshit with bullshit! It's the only language that's compatible)

[Alex K]

Genesis 7:2 'Of every clean beast thou shalt take to thee seven and seven, each with his mate; and of the beasts that are not clean two [and two], each with his mate;'.

Thus, Noah could not have taken baby dinos, since sexually immature organisms cannot have a mate.  Eggs are RIGHT OUT.

So vorlon got it... gonna need a WAY bigger boat.

Boru

Naah, by mate they mean mate like the Australians. This is baby dinosaur Jane, and this over here is her mate Johnny.

[chimp3]

Here is what Ken Ham says about Dinosaurs ( He is such an ignorant Asshole!) :

"What Did Dinosaurs Eat?
The Bible teaches (in Genesis 1:29–30) that the original animals (and the first humans) were commanded to be vegetarian. There were no meat eaters in the original creation. Furthermore, there was no death. It was an unblemished world, with Adam and Eve and animals (including dinosaurs) living in perfect harmony, eating only plants.
Sadly, it did not stay this way for very long. Adam rebelled against his Creator, bringing sin into the world (Genesis 3:1–7; Romans 5:12). Because of this rebellion, Adam, and thus all of his descendants (you and me), gave up the right to live with a Holy (sinless) and just God. God therefore judged sin with death.
The Bible plainly teaches from Genesis to Revelation that there was no death of animals or humans before Adam sinned. (Consider just a few of the many passages, such as: Romans 5:12; Genesis 2:17; Genesis 1:29–30; Romans 8:20–22; Acts 3:21; Hebrews 9:22; 1 Corinthians 15; Revelation 21:1–4; Revelation 22:3.) This means there could not have been any animal fossils (and no dinosaur bones) before sin.
After Adam’s sin, animals and people started to die. It was now a different world, one of death and strife. A world that was once beautiful now suffered under the curse placed upon it by the Creator (Genesis 3:14–19). But a promise was given (Genesis 3:15) that God would provide a way for the penalty of sin to be paid so there would be a way for man to come back to God." KH


So , he is saying that at the time of the flood , dinosaurs were not in their vegetarian mode. Part of the world of death and strife. This is too rich in comic potential. The thought of Cain and Abel as shepherd boys with their crooked staffs having to contend with velociraptors. Brontosaur's stomping their grape vines.

The thought that anyone in the 21st century is this blind by faith seriously disturbs me.

[ignoramus]

That bloody Paul Hogan has a lot to answer for!

[Aoi Magi]

Thus, Noah could not have taken baby dinos, since sexually immature organisms cannot have a mate.  Eggs are RIGHT OUT.

*bold mine

...and when has being sexually immature bothered anyone in the bible?