Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 1, 2026, 2:29 am
Atheist Forums › Science › General Science v
Ken Ham's Ark Debunked in One Picture

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Ken Ham's Ark Debunked in One Picture
LivingNumbers6.626 Offline
Junior Member
**
Religious Views: Agnostic
Posts: 361
Threads: 64
Joined: March 28, 2014
Reputation: 15
#11
RE: Ken Ham's Ark Debunked in One Picture
July 17, 2016 at 6:51 pm
But you don't get it, the arc was after the dinosaurs! Can't you see? Forget all the other facts to consider like water and food resources along with probable extinction due to an imbalance in predator vs prey. But dinosaurs didn't go on the arc, silly!
"Just call me Bruce Wayne. I'd rather be Batman."
Find
Reply
Kitan Etos Offline Donators
Previous username: Paraselene
Faith's Nightmare
*****
Religious Views: Infidel Savant
Posts: 35390
Threads: 1439
Joined: March 15, 2013
Reputation: 152
#12
RE: Ken Ham's Ark Debunked in One Picture
July 17, 2016 at 6:53 pm
Don't forget incest. That was on the ark, too.
"What a little moonlight can do." ~ Billie Holiday
Find
Reply
Minimalist Offline Donators
Go Blow Jesus Out Your Ass
*****
Religious Views: Fuck It
Posts: 69246
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation: 258
#13
RE: Ken Ham's Ark Debunked in One Picture
July 17, 2016 at 6:53 pm
No, no.  Dinosaurs were fucking xtians!

[Image: 30-9-089.jpg]
Find
Reply
BrianSoddingBoru4 Offline
Power-Drunk Administrator
********
Religious Views: Headology
Posts: 52654
Threads: 567
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation: 109
#14
RE: Ken Ham's Ark Debunked in One Picture
July 17, 2016 at 6:58 pm
Genesis 7:2 'Of every clean beast thou shalt take to thee seven and seven, each with his mate; and of the beasts that are not clean two [and two], each with his mate;'.

Thus, Noah could not have taken baby dinos, since sexually immature organisms cannot have a mate. Eggs are RIGHT OUT.

So vorlon got it... gonna need a WAY bigger boat.

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Find
Reply
Aoi Magi Offline
The coolest magi in existence
****
Religious Views: not sure
Posts: 6868
Threads: 51
Joined: September 14, 2014
Reputation: 43
#15
RE: Ken Ham's Ark Debunked in One Picture
July 18, 2016 at 1:58 am
They made 'em tiny with magic, duh!!!
Find
Reply
ignoramus Offline
wiggle wiggle
*****
Religious Views: n/a
Posts: 20476
Threads: 447
Joined: June 16, 2014
Reputation: 110
#16
RE: Ken Ham's Ark Debunked in One Picture
July 18, 2016 at 5:28 am (This post was last modified: July 18, 2016 at 5:28 am by ignoramus.)
The Ark was a tardis!
Its volumetric efficiency changed as needed!

(You have to fight bullshit with bullshit! It's the only language that's compatible)
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.
Find
Reply
Alex K Offline
Ich fühle Luft von anderem Planeten
*****
Religious Views: Theism is not plausible
Posts: 18544
Threads: 131
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation: 90
#17
RE: Ken Ham's Ark Debunked in One Picture
July 18, 2016 at 5:31 am
(July 17, 2016 at 6:58 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Genesis 7:2 'Of every clean beast thou shalt take to thee seven and seven, each with his mate; and of the beasts that are not clean two [and two], each with his mate;'.

Thus, Noah could not have taken baby dinos, since sexually immature organisms cannot have a mate.  Eggs are RIGHT OUT.

So vorlon got it... gonna need a WAY bigger boat.

Boru

Naah, by mate they mean mate like the Australians. This is baby dinosaur Jane, and this over here is her mate Johnny.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Find
Reply
chimp3 Offline Donators
Chimp Magnet
*****
Religious Views: NoReligion2
Posts: 5664
Threads: 219
Joined: June 20, 2016
Reputation: 61
#18
RE: Ken Ham's Ark Debunked in One Picture
July 18, 2016 at 5:37 am
God thinks it's fun to confuse primates. Larsen's God!






Find
Reply
ignoramus Offline
wiggle wiggle
*****
Religious Views: n/a
Posts: 20476
Threads: 447
Joined: June 16, 2014
Reputation: 110
#19
RE: Ken Ham's Ark Debunked in One Picture
July 18, 2016 at 5:38 am (This post was last modified: July 18, 2016 at 5:38 am by ignoramus.)
That bloody Paul Hogan has a lot to answer for!


[Image: 17kh5z.jpg]
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.
Find
Reply
Aoi Magi Offline
The coolest magi in existence
****
Religious Views: not sure
Posts: 6868
Threads: 51
Joined: September 14, 2014
Reputation: 43
#20
RE: Ken Ham's Ark Debunked in One Picture
July 18, 2016 at 5:44 am
(July 17, 2016 at 6:58 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Thus, Noah could not have taken baby dinos, since sexually immature organisms cannot have a mate.  Eggs are RIGHT OUT.
*bold mine

...and when has being sexually immature bothered anyone in the bible?
Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Science › General Science v
Ken Ham's Ark Debunked in One Picture

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The myth that people are animals debunked FreethinkingSceptic 11 2155 August 29, 2026 at 1:25 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Fuck Ken Ham and the Rest of The Creatards Minimalist 7 3108 April 18, 2017 at 9:30 am
Last Post: Mister Agenda
  And nary a fucking ark to be seen.... Minimalist 23 9084 August 14, 2014 at 2:42 am
Last Post: OfficerVajardian
  The whole Bill Nye/Ken Ham debate Boris Karloff 26 10908 January 26, 2014 at 4:32 pm
Last Post: Clueless Morgan
  Ancient Aliens Debunked Minimalist 17 14767 October 6, 2012 at 12:32 pm
Last Post: Cinjin
  The Ark Strikes A Reef Minimalist 0 1533 December 9, 2010 at 12:05 pm
Last Post: Minimalist



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)