Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: The "Cultural Context" Excuse
August 9, 2016 at 7:15 am
(This post was last modified: August 9, 2016 at 7:16 am by robvalue.)
This is why I never liked English class. You could basically write anything, and the teacher might say it's good, or might say it's bad. I liked maths. 2+2 = 4 thanks very much, no stupid discussion.
I remember in English class I submitted one my final projects, and the teacher said, "This is a B". I got one more chance to "improve" it. I asked what I needed to go to get it to an A. She said, "I can't tell you that."
Fuck off! What stupid subject is this? You don't even know what your own criteria is?
So I made it sound more like the kind of drivel she writes. I got an A.
Posts: 43162
Threads: 720
Joined: September 21, 2008
Reputation:
133
RE: The "Cultural Context" Excuse
August 9, 2016 at 7:17 am
(August 9, 2016 at 6:54 am)Rhythm Wrote: Still trying to establish that human beings are demi-dragons, eh?
Actually I was talking to Cleverbot some minutes ago and it called me a dragon. Coincidence? I think not!
I told it that I was not a dragon but a turtle but nevertheless I believe in Christ now.
Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
156
RE: The "Cultural Context" Excuse
August 9, 2016 at 9:40 am
(This post was last modified: August 9, 2016 at 9:41 am by Cyberman.)
(August 9, 2016 at 7:15 am)robvalue Wrote: This is why I never liked English class. You could basically write anything, and the teacher might say it's good, or might say it's bad. I liked maths. 2+2 = 4 thanks very much, no stupid discussion.
I remember in English class I submitted one my final projects, and the teacher said, "This is a B". I got one more chance to "improve" it. I asked what I needed to go to get it to an A. She said, "I can't tell you that."
Fuck off! What stupid subject is this? You don't even know what your own criteria is?
So I made it sound more like the kind of drivel she writes. I got an A.
Back when we had Technical Drawing class - basically draftsmanship - at school, I remember once some exercise we'd been given to do. I took my finished work up to the teacher for his evaluation and he went through it in great critical detail, telling me exactly what was wrong with it and to do it all again. So I went back to my draft table, put the drawing away and did precisely nothing to it. Next lesson, I took it to him again, literally unchanged, and he told me it was so much better. In fact, he couldn't praise it highly enough. I got full marks and a lesson in life he never intended.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 12023
Threads: 125
Joined: January 11, 2010
Reputation:
45
RE: The "Cultural Context" Excuse
August 9, 2016 at 9:56 am
It's also worth noting that I decided to look up the word he insists meant "seduction" in Strong's Concordance. Here's what I found:
nasha'
Pronunciation nä·shä' (Key)
Part of Speech verb
TWOT Reference: 1425
KJV Translation Count — Total: 16x
The KJV translates Strongs H5377 in the following manner: deceive (12x), greatly (1x), beguiled me (1x), seize (1x), utterly (1x).
Outline of Biblical Usage [?]
to beguile, deceive
(Niphal) to be beguiled
(Hiphil) to beguile, deceive
(Qal) utterly (infinitive)
Strong’s Definitions [?](Strong’s Definitions Legend)
נָשָׁא nâshâʼ, naw-shaw'; a primitive root; to lead astray, i.e. (mentally) to delude, or (morally) to seduce:—beguile, deceive, × greatly, × utterly.
It's looking more and more like special pleading for him to insist it means "seduce."
Comparing the Universal Oneness of All Life to Yo Mama since 2010.
![[Image: harmlesskitchen.png]](https://i.postimg.cc/yxR97P23/harmlesskitchen.png)
I was born with the gift of laughter and a sense the world is mad.
Posts: 66911
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
162
RE: The "Cultural Context" Excuse
August 9, 2016 at 11:08 am
Meh, it's his porno...he can write in whatever he likes. I prefer the Song of Solomon myself. Translators twist their scrotums trying to make that one anything less than x-rated.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 7568
Threads: 20
Joined: July 26, 2013
Reputation:
54
RE: The "Cultural Context" Excuse
August 9, 2016 at 11:41 am
(August 9, 2016 at 11:08 am)Rhythm Wrote: Meh, it's his porno...he can write in whatever he likes. I prefer the Song of Solomon myself. Translators twist their scrotums trying to make that one anything less than x-rated.
Christ's love for his church . . . 
Prudish fucks.
Posts: 4738
Threads: 7
Joined: October 17, 2013
Reputation:
15
RE: The "Cultural Context" Excuse
August 9, 2016 at 4:02 pm
(This post was last modified: August 9, 2016 at 4:05 pm by Huggy Bear.)
(August 9, 2016 at 9:56 am)Rev. Rye Wrote: It's also worth noting that I decided to look up the word he insists meant "seduction" in Strong's Concordance. Here's what I found:
nasha'
Pronunciation nä·shä' (Key)
Part of Speech verb
TWOT Reference: 1425
KJV Translation Count — Total: 16x
The KJV translates Strongs H5377 in the following manner: deceive (12x), greatly (1x), beguiled me (1x), seize (1x), utterly (1x).
Outline of Biblical Usage [?]
to beguile, deceive
(Niphal) to be beguiled
(Hiphil) to beguile, deceive
(Qal) utterly (infinitive)
Strong’s Definitions [?](Strong’s Definitions Legend)
נָשָׁא nâshâʼ, naw-shaw'; a primitive root; to lead astray, i.e. (mentally) to delude, or (morally) to seduce:—beguile, deceive, × greatly, × utterly.[/b]
It's looking more and more like special pleading for him to insist it means "seduce."
*emphasis mine* (also put the relevant parts in blind-as-bat red)
I guess it was only inevitable for you to make a fool of yourself as people usually tend to do when they have no idea of the subject matter they are discussing.
Also I never insisted anything, I simply stated that 'beguile' and 'seduce' are synonymous, no if and's or but's about that, don't believe me? look in a thesaurus.
Posts: 7568
Threads: 20
Joined: July 26, 2013
Reputation:
54
RE: The "Cultural Context" Excuse
August 9, 2016 at 4:13 pm
Aren't you the one claiming that Eve literally had sex with (was seduced by) the serpent-creature/Satan/what-the-fuck-ever? That's hardly the same as being morally seduced, since 'moral seduction' would form a much larger set of possibilities -- e.g., disobedience.
Then again, it's odd that Eve, who had not yet eaten of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, could be morally seduced in any case. Not that I really care. It's not my concern to defend any particular reading of this myth, much less yours.
Posts: 4738
Threads: 7
Joined: October 17, 2013
Reputation:
15
RE: The "Cultural Context" Excuse
August 9, 2016 at 4:32 pm
(August 9, 2016 at 4:13 pm)Crossless1 Wrote: Aren't you the one claiming that Eve literally had sex with (was seduced by) the serpent-creature/Satan/what-the-fuck-ever? That's hardly the same as being morally seduced, since 'moral seduction' would form a much larger set of possibilities -- e.g., disobedience. *emphasis mine*
Uh no, it's exactly the same.
What that definition of 'nasha' is saying is that it can be used in a "mental sense" OR in a "moral sense" eg. led astray mentally (deceived), or led astray morally (seduced). Last time I looked, A woman committing Adultery is still considered IMMORAL.
Posts: 7568
Threads: 20
Joined: July 26, 2013
Reputation:
54
RE: The "Cultural Context" Excuse
August 9, 2016 at 4:36 pm
(August 9, 2016 at 4:32 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: (August 9, 2016 at 4:13 pm)Crossless1 Wrote: Aren't you the one claiming that Eve literally had sex with (was seduced by) the serpent-creature/Satan/what-the-fuck-ever? That's hardly the same as being morally seduced, since 'moral seduction' would form a much larger set of possibilities -- e.g., disobedience. *emphasis mine*
Uh no, it's exactly the same.
What that definition of 'nasha' is saying is that it can be used in a "mental sense" OR in a "moral sense" eg. led astray mentally (deceived), or led astray morally (seduced). Last time I looked, A woman committing Adultery is still considered IMMORAL.
Presumably, so would a woman disobeying an order from her creator to abstain from eating from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil -- you know, the plainly obvious sense of the story.
You must have some really disturbing psycho-sexual flotsam in your head to insist so vehemently on your pet reading of this story.
|
