Here is Practical Explanation about Next Life, Purpose of Human Life,

[Edwardo Piet]

I think we should all start calling him rectum.

[reta]

my dear so called intelligent `1 as i have said thousand times before that although my english is not very grammatically, rhetorically correct and Rascals are concerned with grammar. Actual workers are concerned with thoughts.

is this simple thing is very hard to understand ? are you such an highly educated that you cant even understand this simple thing ?

Your incessant insults make you a poor representative for your religion.

so child is not interested for education. But it is the duty of the father to make him educated, sometimes father punish him. So a child may be foolish, but how the parents can be foolish?”  
 
what is your answer ??

[madog]

I think we should all start calling him rectum.

My rectum spews shit, but I understand my shit 

[Homeless Nutter]

So now you already dont know this thing that who is your real father. so D.N.A test means you admit that you need help of your real mother. so in all respects you have to approach your real mother.

and now if you also dont know your real mother then what is meaning of such so called D.N.A test ?

same you have to follow real authority. "Whatever You have spoken, I accept it," Then there is no difficulty.

Otherwise, if you makes research, "Who is my father?" go on searching for life; you'll never find your father.

[Mister Agenda]

People in the past grappled with the meaning of life and death the same as happens today .... the difference is those that are lazy now rely on shit made up in the past .....

If you need a fairy story to make life and dying bearable, make up your own story and keep it to yourself. 

and ( rascal dog ) now You can avoid the creator, but you cannot say He doesn't exist. Whether or not you accept the creator's authority is your business; but you cannot say there is no creator.

For example :- there are so many outlaws who say, "We don't want to obey the government." If you don't like the government, that is your business. But there is a government -- you can't deny that.

I can say I don't think there's a creator. The claim that there is one doesn't seem to be based on anything but a lack of capacity to imagine important things occurring without personal agency; and that's not enough to convince me.

I could deny that there is a government, but it would be stupid to do so because the existence of one's government is readily verifiable by nearly universally accepted standards of evidence. Unlike a proposed creator of the universe.

[Mister Agenda]

Your incessant insults make you a poor representative for your religion.

so child is not interested for education. But it is the duty of the father to make him educated, sometimes father punish him. So a child may be foolish, but how the parents can be foolish?”  
 
what is your answer ??

You know, when you ask a question, it's redundant to also ask for an answer.

Parents can certainly be foolish, the existence of foolish parents proves that. However, small children are often not equipped to properly evaluate if one of their parents is being foolish or reasonable. That doesn't mean the child is wrong in a particular case. For instance, the child would be mistaken to think their parent is foolish for making them get a vaccination. The child would be correct to think their parent is foolish for trying to keep them from getting any education.

[Joods]

And really, in the grand scheme of things, isn't that all that matters? [...]

Depends on what you mean by "grand scheme". For medical reasons - it's often important to know one's biological parents. All sorts of genetic factors have huge effect on quality of life.

Yes... if you want to get all symantical about it, yes. But there are going to be instances somewhere in the world where knowing one's biological parents just aren't possible and knowing a medical history just isn't possible. Various scenarios.

Without having to list every single solitary scenario, "grand scheme" was/is a generalized term for "getting to the heart of the issue".
That is basically what I was saying.

Trying to avoid overthinking, over-rationalizing, over-anything about this because I think we're dealing with a cousin of LR and it's easier to just use the KISS method, rather than get into deep thought about things.

[reta]

and ( rascal dog ) now You can avoid the creator, but you cannot say He doesn't exist. Whether or not you accept the creator's authority is your business; but you cannot say there is no creator.

For example :- there are so many outlaws who say, "We don't want to obey the government." If you don't like the government, that is your business. But there is a government -- you can't deny that.

I can say I don't think there's a creator. The claim that there is one doesn't seem to be based on anything but a lack of capacity to imagine important things occurring without personal agency; and that's not enough to convince me.

I could deny that there is a government, but it would be stupid to do so because the existence of one's government is readily verifiable by nearly universally accepted standards of evidence. Unlike a proposed creator of the universe.

and i also can say that there is no intelligence. you dont have intelligence. and if there is intelligence then recall everything which you have thought or done on each second within`1 cheap minute.

go ahead and do it now. and prove it that there is intelligence.

[Joods]

and i also can say that there is no intelligence. you dont have intelligence. and if there is intelligence then recall everything which you have thought or done on each second within`1 cheap minute.

go ahead and do it now. and prove it that there is intelligence.

Why don't you demonstrate to the rest of us, how that's done, exactly.

[Edwardo Piet]

I don't think Mr. rectum will last much longer on these boards.

Just a thought