Here is Practical Explanation about Next Life, Purpose of Human Life,

[madog]

I can say I don't think there's a creator. The claim that there is one doesn't seem to be based on anything but a lack of capacity to imagine important things occurring without personal agency; and that's not enough to convince me.

I could deny that there is a government, but it would be stupid to do so because the existence of one's government is readily verifiable by nearly universally accepted standards of evidence. Unlike a proposed creator of the universe.

and i also can say that there is no intelligence. you dont have intelligence. and if there is intelligence then recall everything which you have thought or done on each second within`1 cheap minute.

go ahead and do it now. and prove it that there is intelligence.

You can only prove intelligence if the ability of the person asking for the proof is capable of understanding .... Once you have evolved beyond a (Rascal dog) come back and we will attempt to do so 

[reta]

so child is not interested for education. But it is the duty of the father to make him educated, sometimes father punish him. So a child may be foolish, but how the parents can be foolish?”  
 
what is your answer ??

You know, when you ask a question, it's redundant to also ask for an answer.

Parents can certainly be foolish, the existence of foolish parents proves that. However, small children are often not equipped to properly evaluate if one of their parents is being foolish or reasonable. That doesn't mean the child is wrong in a particular case. For instance, the child would be mistaken to think their parent is foolish for making them get a vaccination. The child would be correct to think their parent is foolish for trying to keep them from getting any education.

so you mean that those parents who want to get there child educated are foolish ? is that is what do you mean ? and as far as question of childs intelligence so he cant even tell this thing that who is his real father without the help of his real mother.

[Esquilax]

and i also can say that there is no intelligence. you dont have intelligence. and if there is intelligence then recall everything which you have thought or done on each second within`1 cheap minute.

go ahead and do it now. and prove it that there is intelligence.

Are you, perhaps, aware of the "99% equals 0%" fallacy?

Or, you know, basic grammatical structure?

[Crossless2.0]

Moron thinks intelligence = perfect recall, and then asks us to prove there is intelligence.

/thread.

*Dances away, tambourine in hand, singing "Hare, Hare, Hare!"*

[Joods]

I don't think Mr. rectum will last much longer on these boards.

Just a thought

Well... I see another one of our confused residents getting all jealous because a new dog is in town that's getting all the attention.

Better hope they don't end up on the same thread. It could cause quite a lot of brain hurt.

[Mister Agenda]

So now you already dont know this thing that who is your real father. so D.N.A test means you admit that you need help of your real mother. so in all respects you have to approach your real mother.

and now if you also dont know your real mother then what is meaning of such so called D.N.A test ?

same you have to follow real authority. "Whatever You have spoken, I accept it," Then there is no difficulty.

Otherwise, if you makes research, "Who is my father?" go on searching for life; you'll never find your father.

Correct, I don't know for sure if the people I think are my biological parents are actually my biological parents. If they're not, they're still the only parents I know, and I'm fine with that. I have no particular reason to want to confirm or disconfirm that. If I wanted to find out, I wouldn't need to approach my real mother. I could have my mother tested and if she is not my real mother, that's that.

A DNA test can conclusively prove whether a given individual is a biological relative. We get half of our chromosomes from our mother (plus mitochondrial DNA) and half our chromosomes from our father. DNA sequencing is a reasonable way of determining paternity and maternity if such is in doubt.

Real authority can be readily ascertained, the first step is to establish that the claimed authority actually exists and is not just some people trying to exercise authority on behalf of something they've dreamed up to give themselves an imaginary basis to claim authority. You can usually tell them by their claims that the being that they're speaking for can't be proven not to exist.

If I never find my 'real' father, so what? The one I have is enough, whether we're 'the same blood' or not. Who I'm biologically related to is trivial compared to who actually raised me.

[Mister Agenda]

You know, when you ask a question, it's redundant to also ask for an answer.

Parents can certainly be foolish, the existence of foolish parents proves that. However, small children are often not equipped to properly evaluate if one of their parents is being foolish or reasonable. That doesn't mean the child is wrong in a particular case. For instance, the child would be mistaken to think their parent is foolish for making them get a vaccination. The child would be correct to think their parent is foolish for trying to keep them from getting any education.

so you mean that those parents who want to get there child educated are foolish ? is that is what do you mean ? and as far as question of childs intelligence so he cant even tell this thing that who is his real father without the help of his real mother.

Since that is literally the opposite of what I said, it should be obvious that it is not what I mean.

[Mister Agenda]

I can say I don't think there's a creator. The claim that there is one doesn't seem to be based on anything but a lack of capacity to imagine important things occurring without personal agency; and that's not enough to convince me.

I could deny that there is a government, but it would be stupid to do so because the existence of one's government is readily verifiable by nearly universally accepted standards of evidence. Unlike a proposed creator of the universe.

and i also can say that there is no intelligence. you dont have intelligence. and if there is intelligence then recall everything which you have thought or done on each second within`1 cheap minute.

go ahead and do it now. and prove it that there is intelligence.

You could say there is no intelligence, but it wouldn't be true. It's not even a thing that it makes sense to say. I must have some intelligence, or I wouldn't be able to type my replies to you. Perfect recall is not an expected feature of human intellect.

Even if I had perfect recall, you're asking me to break the laws of nature to recount every second of my life, including my thoughts, in sixty seconds. My life took considerably longer than 60 seconds in the first place.

in·tel·li·gence
inˈteləjəns/
noun
noun: intelligence
[ol]
[li]1.
the ability to acquire and apply knowledge and skills.[/li]
[/ol]

[reta]

Correct, I don't know for sure if the people I think are my biological parents are actually my biological parents. If they're not, they're still the only parents I know, and I'm fine with that. I have no particular reason to want to confirm or disconfirm that. If I wanted to find out, I wouldn't need to approach my real mother. I could have my mother tested and if she is not my real mother, that's that.

A DNA test can conclusively prove whether a given individual is a biological relative. We get half of our chromosomes from our mother (plus mitochondrial DNA) and half our chromosomes from our father. DNA sequencing is a reasonable way of determining paternity and maternity if such is in doubt.

Real authority can be readily ascertained, the first step is to establish that the claimed authority actually exists and is not just some people trying to exercise authority on behalf of something they've dreamed up to give themselves an imaginary basis to claim authority. You can usually tell them by their claims that the being that they're speaking for can't be proven not to exist.

If I never find my 'real' father, so what? The one I have is enough, whether we're 'the same blood' or not. Who I'm biologically related to is trivial compared to who actually raised me.

answer is :- Just like you learn who is your father. You take the version of your mother and you believe that "He is my father." Otherwise there is no other way. How can you know your father? The only means is his mother recommends, "My dear boy, he is your father." And that is perfect, that's all. Otherwise you cannot know who is your father.

so now you already dont know your real father but if you also dont know your real mother then there is no meaning of such an bogus D.N.A test. so in all resprects you have to approach your real mother.

and if you dont care for your real father then you remained misfortunate`1. and go on suffering repeated birth after birth. that is your business.


and now You can avoid the creator, but you cannot say He doesn't exist. Whether or not you accept the creator's authority is your business; but you cannot say there is no creator.

For example :- there are so many outlaws who say, "We don't want to obey the government." If you don't like the government, that is your business. But there is a government -- you can't deny that.

[FatAndFaithless]

"There is no creator."