Newest super-sensitive test failed to catch a Dark Matter particle. Why?
|
Newest super-sensitive test failed to catch a Dark Matter particle. Why?
|
 RE: Newest super-sensitive test failed to catch a Dark Matter particle. Why?
August 12, 2016 at 1:23 pm
Are you applying for a job here???
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
RE: Newest super-sensitive test failed to catch a Dark Matter particle. Why?
August 12, 2016 at 1:25 pm
Oh, and, Welcome to the forum! You sound interesting
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
 RE: Newest super-sensitive test failed to catch a Dark Matter particle. Why?
August 12, 2016 at 1:34 pm
(August 12, 2016 at 12:31 pm)theBorg Wrote:(August 12, 2016 at 12:14 pm)Aoi Magi Wrote: Welcome to the forum. Not just true, but capital-T True? Hahaha. Prove it.  RE: Newest super-sensitive test failed to catch a Dark Matter particle. Why?
August 12, 2016 at 1:36 pm
Well if it's anything like the capital T Truth of Jesus, it's false.
 RE: Newest super-sensitive test failed to catch a Dark Matter particle. Why?
August 12, 2016 at 1:49 pm
RE: Newest super-sensitive test failed to catch a Dark Matter particle. Why?
August 12, 2016 at 2:18 pm
(August 12, 2016 at 1:49 pm)LostLocke Wrote:(August 12, 2016 at 11:16 am)theBorg Wrote: Thus, the area of Dark Matter is the anomaly.Huh. This appears to be case. WMAP suggests that 4.6% of the mass/energy of the visible universe is baryonic matter (in layman's terms, ordinary matter capable of being directly observed). Of that 4.6%, only 10% is found within galaxies. We can only infer the existence of the overwhelming majority of the mass/energy of the universe. RE: Newest super-sensitive test failed to catch a Dark Matter particle. Why?
August 12, 2016 at 2:37 pm
(This post was last modified: August 12, 2016 at 2:38 pm by Alex K.)
The answer to the thread title is "nobody knows", the longer answer is that dark matter apparently isn't made of particles that this particular type of experiment can pick up. That's all we know. Just as an example, if dark matter is made of Axion particles, the recently published PANDA XII and LUX experiments couldn't possibly detect them because they are the wrong setup to register those particles.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
 RE: Newest super-sensitive test failed to catch a Dark Matter particle. Why?
August 13, 2016 at 1:27 am
(This post was last modified: August 13, 2016 at 6:46 pm by Mystical.
Edit Reason: Moderation
)
(August 12, 2016 at 2:37 pm)Alex K Wrote: if dark matter is made of Axion particles,In lower dimensional Gravity the Dark Matter is necessarily present and is necessarily made nothing else but from spacetime only. (According to my research). Who is not used to my VERY NORMAL English, please see the video about the unusual speech: Moderator Notice
Link Removed due to 30/30 rule. You must be a member for thirty days and have had thirty posts before being able to post links or images to outside of the forum. Stick around for another 29 days! RE: Newest super-sensitive test failed to catch a Dark Matter particle. Why?
August 13, 2016 at 1:30 am
Somehow I expect this to not be amongst the findings of mainstream cosmology.
RE: Newest super-sensitive test failed to catch a Dark Matter particle. Why?
August 13, 2016 at 1:32 am
What is lower dimensional gravity?
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Newest super-sensitive test failed to catch a Dark Matter particle. Why?
