Play "Cards Against Atheist Forums" online now!
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: 20th July 2017, 20:30

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Mathematical Proof Thread
#41
RE: The Mathematical Proof Thread
(2nd October 2016, 01:17)robvalue Wrote: Interesting! I'll have a look at those later if my brain starts working.

Just as an aside, we don't allow 1 to be a prime number because we would lose unique factorisation of integers into primes. For example:

6 = 2 * 3 Unique

6 = 2 * 3 * 1 = 2 * 3 * 1 * 1 = ...

Why do I find humor in this?
God(s) and religions are man made and the bane of humanity. 

Of all the things I've lost, I miss my mind the most. Ozzy or Twain/take your pick
Reply
#42
RE: The Mathematical Proof Thread
I don't know Tongue Maths is fun! I've always said so Wink

Cool stuff about the binomial! I think I remember working out a similar proof when I was bored at college, many years ago. I can't remember if it was exactly the same.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
#43
RE: The Mathematical Proof Thread
Prove that C(n-1,k-1) + C(n-1,k)= C(n,k)


Proof strategy.




Proof

"I'm fearful when I see people substituting fear for reason." Klaatu, from The Day The Earth Stood Still (1951)














Reply
#44
RE: The Mathematical Proof Thread
Hello AF members.  When I first made this thread, I had intended it to be one of those threads where people could post endlessly even if there were a long intermission between posts such as this post.  Hence, I want to apologize to the staff if I'm breaking the rules by posting this.  

With that said, I didn't recall seeing many induction proofs here, so I thought I'd post one for any member who is curious about induction, especially for the younger members (high school) who are getting interested in mathematics.  Here it is:

Prove that 1^2+2^2+…+ (n-1)^2 < n^3/3 < 1^2+2^2+…+ n^2 is true for all positive integers n.


Hint: use mathematical induction.

Background on Mathematical Induction




 
Proof 


"I'm fearful when I see people substituting fear for reason." Klaatu, from The Day The Earth Stood Still (1951)














Reply
#45
RE: The Mathematical Proof Thread
Consider the function θ: P(ℤ) → P(ℤ) defined as θ(X)=X^c (note ℤ is the set of all integers).  We can also rephrase this as the function θ from the power set of ℤ to the power set of ℤ is defined as the function θ whose input set X produces an output set equal to the complement of X (or X^c).  Now determine if θ  is injective, surjective, and bijective. This problem was retrieved via Hammack, Richard. (2013) Book of Proof, 2nd ed. Virginia commonwealth University: published by Richard Hammack, pg 205.

Definitions and Terms


Injective, surjective, and bijective functions. 




 
The complement




The law of double complements






The Power Set



 
Proof (My attempt)

 
 
"I'm fearful when I see people substituting fear for reason." Klaatu, from The Day The Earth Stood Still (1951)














Reply
#46
RE: The Mathematical Proof Thread
Heh. I love listening (reading in this case) to smart people talk about smart stuff. Math, techy stuff, physics, you name it. If there was a room full of people having this conversation, I'd probably be sitting in a corner watching intensely and almost excitedly. Carry on.
Angel
"Hipster is what happens when young hot people do what old ladies do." -Exian
Reply
#47
RE: The Mathematical Proof Thread
(1st February 2017, 22:10)Mamacita Wrote: Heh. I love listening (reading in this case) to smart people talk about smart stuff. Math, techy stuff, physics, you name it. If there was a room full of people having this conversation, I'd probably be sitting in a corner watching intensely and almost excitedly. Carry on.
Angel

You're very kind.  IMO, you are an intelligent poster of this forum and there are probably many topics that you know about which would cause me to be in awe of you. 

With that said, IMO, at best, I have gained an appreciation for mathematics and think it is cool; however, I've got a lot to learn and there are many concepts beyond me, which I will need to master and cultivate before I can be worthy of any sort of merit or whateverSmile. Thanks and Live long and prosper.
"I'm fearful when I see people substituting fear for reason." Klaatu, from The Day The Earth Stood Still (1951)














Reply
#48
RE: The Mathematical Proof Thread
Don't stress Mama... Pretty sure he's a Vulcan, like Alex...
Quote:AtlasS33 wrote:
"When it comes to the deiety I worship, he sent a book, it contained a message. I took that message, tested it, then I realized he is God : it didn't break against reality."
Pulse Wrote:
~ Atheism seems so incredibly counter intuitive, that to even begin to take it seriously, one has to suspend all logic."

Religion: making the uncomfortable comfortable for thousands of years.
Reply
#49
RE: The Mathematical Proof Thread
Here's a quick, and IMO, interesting video on the Fibonacci numbers by Arthur Benjamin



"I'm fearful when I see people substituting fear for reason." Klaatu, from The Day The Earth Stood Still (1951)














Reply
#50
RE: The Mathematical Proof Thread
(8th October 2016, 10:05)mh.brewer Wrote:
(2nd October 2016, 01:17)robvalue Wrote: Interesting! I'll have a look at those later if my brain starts working.

Just as an aside, we don't allow 1 to be a prime number because we would lose unique factorisation of integers into primes. For example:

6 = 2 * 3 Unique

6 = 2 * 3 * 1 = 2 * 3 * 1 * 1 = ...

Why do I find humor in this?

I find it humorous because I misread it as "we don't allow 1 to be prime minister".

So used to Rob's deadpan jokes I thought he was making some kind of math...s pun.
"Work quickly. And the same applies for doing albums or any project. Just work quickly. You can fix it later if you need to., Work quickly, get it in there and and you know what? Try not to fiddle. If you've got lots of things that you want to do to change it then maybe what you are trying to do is do another project. Don't keep imposing all your fresh ideas on the old work. Do it, finish it, get it done good enough - do it and then: do something else. Don't keep fiddling. I see people get lost regurgitating an album that sounds good! They might play me an album and I say "That's great! Get it out."

Five years later they've regurgitated that same album so much that it's not even the same album anymore and you wonder what went on and what process went on in their heads." - Paul Hartnoll
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Million Dollar Prize for Math proof of NP problems emilynghiem 6 2005 22nd February 2015, 00:47
Last Post: vorlon13
  "Gödel's ontological proof" proves existence of God Belac Enrobso 41 8777 9th February 2015, 03:22
Last Post: Alex K
  Mathematical proof.. lifesagift 20 3946 26th September 2014, 17:01
Last Post: lifesagift
Information My proof for de morgans law LogicMaster 17 2600 29th May 2014, 19:55
Last Post: Cyberman
  Mathematician Claims Proof of Connection between Prime Numbers KichigaiNeko 10 4830 26th September 2012, 03:18
Last Post: Categories+Sheaves
  Need a proof (real analysis) CliveStaples 8 3918 2nd August 2012, 22:11
Last Post: CliveStaples
  Mathematical proof of the existence of God JudgeDracoAmunRa 20 9048 30th March 2012, 11:43
Last Post: JudgeDracoAmunRa
  Spot the Mathematical Fallacy Tiberius 16 5928 25th March 2010, 06:57
Last Post: Violet
  Mathematical claims of 'Bible Codes'...is there any truth in the maths? CoxRox 12 5718 9th January 2009, 17:23
Last Post: Tiberius



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)