For US residents only!

[Jehanne]

[Sterben]

I have to agree with the others, it's a waste of time and internet bandwidth. If you think that they will over turn an election your living in dream land. He's gonna be our president for the next four to eight years. Let's just ride out the storm and hope that our relationship with Japan and other important countries does not fall apart. I'm glad I can't be drafted due to the last born male clause and I'm not having children.

Last born male clause ? 

'USian' is a term I have trademarked and copyrighted.  Use it again, and you'll be hearing from my solicitors.

Boru

That's cute. Fuck off now. 

You can, of course!  However, some critics will no doubt criticize the petition for the fact that non-voting US individuals, whether in the US or not, signed it.  Still, it's doing quite well compared to other petitions.  In fact, I think that this one might be the #1 in terms of signatures.

That doesn't make it right for you to preclude me to sign it. I believe this site's
"constitution" upholds my right in that sense , if only tangentially, in this case.

      If your last born male of your direct family you can not be drafted. It's a rule that has been in effect since WW2, when the Solomon brothers all died during. Since there was no males to carry the family line. If you watch the film Saving Private Ryan, all his brothers died in combat; so he was being sent home on that clause.

[vorlon13]

Sullivan

[Excited Penguin]

[Doubting Thomas]

Online petitions don't do anything.

Yes they do.  They allow slacktivists to feel like they're making a change.

This petition won't do anything, because to abolish the electoral college in favor of popular vote, we'd have to amend the Constitution.

[Excited Penguin]

Online petitions don't do anything.

Yes they do.  They allow slacktivists to feel like they're making a change.

This petition won't do anything, because to abolish the electoral college in favor of popular vote, we'd have to amend the Constitution.

It's a way of trying out the waters. I can see a snowball effect here if enough people sign it.

[Doubting Thomas]

The EC was supposed to be a stop-gap, a release valve, if the US electorate got out of control and popularly elected a dimwit to the Presidency. 

And that's exactly what the EC caused to happen this year.

[Aegon]

In this year’s election, Hillary Clinton won about 62% of California’s popular vote, which was a little less than 7 million. The total number of people that voted (Republican, Democrat, or other) in Wyoming, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma, Arkansas, and Mississippi this past election adds up to 7 million. Do you think it’s fair that 60% of California has the same say as 100% of NINE other states? The Electoral College obviously has issues but popular vote gives a ridiculous amount of power to some states and virtually none in others.

Everyone's arguing that states don't matter when 1 person = 1 person. But there are certain interests that vary by region. You're basically telling the midwest they don't matter because they live in an ill-populated state.

Like I said, there are built-in and necessary inequities of the Senate and House that prevent the populous states from ruling over the smaller ones, and therefore their interests are more than fairly represented in the federal government. Again, Wyoming has one Senator per roughly 300,000 people; California, one Senator per 19,000,000. 

I don't know where you're from, but here in California, the most the POTUS candidates do is run TV ads here and there and hold fundraisers for people who can afford tens of thousands of dollars for a plate of chicken and vegetables. Other than that, they don't campaign here because the electoral college makes us not one of the swing states. If it were a popular vote, then Republican candidates would have the opportunity to get out here and garner more votes, which in turn would help the predominantly red states. 

It isn't like Trump lost the popular vote by 15 million. Had it been worth his time to campaign hard on the west coast, it's not unreasonable to think that he could have campaigned his way to several million more votes than he actually received. I fail to see how that is inherently unfair.

I live in NY, so I know how you feel. But you didn't respond to my point about regional interests. Also, there's nothing that you said that couldn't be solved by letting states split their electoral votes.

[Sterben]

[Minimalist]

The Sullivans brought about the navy's rule that only one mmember of a family could serve aboard any one ship.

The 5 Sullivan brothers died when USS Juneau was blown up at the Battle of Guadalcanal.